ANTI-RACIST FORGIVENESS OF ADOLF HITLER (NO JOKE).

INTRODUCTION.

What is the Ismless + ism?

The Ismless + ism is a fundamental word, term or ism. It’s discovery involved the realisation of the adjective ismless and then the addition of thee second ism which forms the noun Ismlessism and does all the removal work. As long as we make Adolf Hitler the Ismlessist and make sure he believes in and professes the Ismless + ism, the Ismless + ism removes or takes racism away from Adolf Hitler. The adjective ismless equals, represents or stands for racism or Adolf Hitler and means that Adolf Hitler and white people are without an ism because they cannot use racism. The addition of thee second ism obviously and ironically turns the adjective Ismless (which means no isms or without isms) into an ism just for good measure and therefore removes or takes racism away from Adolf Hitler.

Ismless = Adolf Hitler

Ismless + ism = racism removed

Forgive Adolf Hitler = remove racial hatred and anger from the world

Miocene Adolf Hitler, (chimpanzee) with right hand. Caveman, prehistoric man, subhuman, monkey, ape, primate, animal.
Miocene Adolf Hitler, (chimpanzee) with right hand.

You get a lot of people who won’t even accept the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, even in an emphatically anti-racist way. This is very un-Christian. I think a lot of people may get schadenfreude about white people’s demise? It’s like there is something wrong with the anti-racist forgiveness of Adolf Hitler? It’s simple. As along as Adolf Hitler is the Ismlessist and professes and believes in the Ismless + ism, the Ismless + ism cuts the head off the snake, removes the racism from Adolf Hitler, (which is his absolution) that leads to the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, as well as the absolution of smaller-scale sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile, as well as the forgiveness of all of our petty or minor sins. And it is the absolution of Adolf Hitler that removes the racial hatred and anger from the world. I believe that to forgive Adolf Hitler is the answer to world peace. Adolf Hitler is the Ismlessist! Adolf Hitler is the Ismless + ism. That’s what to call him. That’s how to forgive him. I am just the fool who wrote an 87,000 word ant-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and then subsequently discovered the Ismless + ism. The rule or law is to refer to Adolf Hitler as the Ismlessist and to refer to everybody else as an Ismlessist. This is how to forgive Adolf Hitler. The Ismless + ism determines that nothing is unfixable. Even the Holocaust. Racism is finished, forget about it. Therefore, we need to find another ism, hence the Ismless + ism. The Ismless + ism is a double ism, it is thee ism and it removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. The Ismless + ism is neither racist nor anti-racist, yet it has the humour. People don’t need to go through a ritual or an initiation process to become an anti-racist for example, they simply pick it up. Therefore, to become an Ismlessist, all that you have to do is read this thesis and if by the end of it, you are convinced about the rightness and benefits of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, then you are a convert to the Ismless + ism. By the time you have finished reading this essay, something should have changed inside of your head, and if you are convinced that you forgive Adolf Hitler, then you are an Ismlessist. The question is, is it technically possible to forgive Adolf Hitler? I am convinced, in fact I know that with the Ismless + ism, the absolution of Adolf Hitler is guaranteed. I know this because the Ismless + ism is fundamental, unquestionable and bulletproof. However, the only problem is how people will react to the instant thought of forgiving Adolf Hitler, without giving this thesis the time and the chance it deserves to explain. What I feel is fear, not doubt, and if people do react negatively to the even the thought of forgiving Adolf Hitler, I know that in the next life I will be vindicated.

Titles.

Please note although my first thesis, that is, the 87,000 word anti-racist joke about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, also called Time For Forgiveness was technically wrong, it was right do it, as it not only led to the Ismless + ism, also the experience of writing a PhD-level 87,000 words, gave me much confidence to write this second thesis which is the correct and genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler, and even more importantly it gave me the confidence to consider (or dream) of writing and publishing a small book about the Ismless + ism. Also as mentioned, my first thesis was an 87,000 word anti-racist joke about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, it is a joke because the whole concept hinged on the scientific impossibility of time travel to the past for Adolf Hitler and equivalence to a real (quote) “subhuman” such as Australopithecus Africanus, in order to seek relative innocence and forgiveness. However, obviously the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics determine that time travel to the past is scientifically impossible, hence, that’s why it was a joke. However, my second thesis (this one) regarding the Ismless + ism is actually the real forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, hence, that is why this new thesis is titled: Anti-racist forgiveness of Adolf Hitler (no joke).

Cut the head off the snake.

The Ismless + ism is a double ism, it is thee ism and it removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. It is bigger than racism and better than anti-racism. Ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness is the absolution of Adolf Hitler, because all other lesser sins are forgiven by default. The idiom ‘to cut the head off the snake’ means to stop a larger problem by aiming at the source – often the leader, or a major culprit. The Ismless + ism is the correction of the root or source of the cause of Holocaust, namely, Adolf Hitler’s racism. Therefore, to cut the head off the snake means that instead of assassination, to make Adolf Hitler the Ismlessist and to make sure he professes and believes in the Ismless + ism, is to cleave or remove the racism from Adolf Hitler, which is the absolution of Adolf Hitler for the Holocaust, which subsequently leads to the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for all of their individual acts of terror during World War Two. To cut the head off the snake also means we can forgive all smaller-scale sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile, and we can forgive all of our lesser sins such as our lying, theft and sexual deviance committed throughout all of space and time. Take the opportunity. To reiterate, the Ismless + ism removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world.”

Graham Cammock

“The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.“ 

Mahatma Gandhi

“Hate the sin, love the sinner.”

Mahatma Gandhi

Then Peter came to him and asked, “Lord, how often should I forgive someone who sins against me? Seven times?” “No, not seven times,” Jesus replied, “but seventy times seven!“

Matthew 18:21-22

“To forgive is to set a prisoner free and discover that the prisoner was you.” 

Lewis B. Smedes

Simultaneity.

As you will find out, the Ismless + ism removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and simultaneously removes the desire from non-white people to want to destroy or conquer Europe as a consequence of the Holocaust. Also, as you will see, the Ismless + ism could in theory kill two birds with one stone, as it might determine that the heretical European Reformation was wrong and is possibly connected to the heathen and pagan European Holocaust, therefore, the Ismless + ism could in theory reverse the Reformation and solve the Holocaust in one.

What does it mean to be an Ismlessist?

I will prove to you that Ismlessists are the most altruistic people on Earth. This is because they devoutly care about the health, safety, fecundity, protection and wellbeing of their own people. However, primarily, to be an Ismlessist means that you forgive Adolf Hitler for the Holocaust. Primarily it means that you fix the Holocaust. Primarily it means that you cleave and remove the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. Primarily it means that you want to help save and protect white people etc. Note all of the above is related and pretty much the same goal. It means that you cut the head off the snake, make Adolf Hitler the Ismlessist, make sure he believes in and professes the Ismless + ism, (which removes the racism from Adolf Hitler), which is his absolution and all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two. To cut the head off the snake also means that you absolve all smaller-scale sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile as well as everybody else’s trivial sins etc. This is what it means to be an Ismlessist.

BACKGROUND.

Before I delve into the philosophical and intellectual background or causes of Nazism and the Holocaust, I wanted to state something. All of the following philosophers’ and scholars’ works that I study and use to explain the intellectual origins of the Holocaust, including Friedrich Nietzsche and George L. Mosse etc, are infinitely wiser and more knowledgable than I about the historic and philosophical causes and origins of the Holocaust, however, putting this immense difference in intellect aside, the only criticism that I have of such academics is that none of them offer a solution to the Holocaust. In our highly censored and politically correct world, it does not seem to matter how intellectually advanced scholars and professors become in recording the history, statistics and facts of the Holocaust and enlightening us about the origins and causes of the Holocaust, none them are able to offer a solution. I believe this is simply because people are far too scared of being seen as racist and politically incorrect etc. I believe people are afraid of career suicide. Therefore, being a humble unintellectual and inarticulate layman, my only saving grace in studying and presenting my thoughts on the origins and causes of the Holocaust, is that I offer a simple and tiny solution to the Holocaust called the Ismless + ism. The question is, does the Holocaust need fixing? I believe it definitely does and I believe the only way to fix the Holocaust is through the forgiveness and absolution of Adolf Hitler.

Inverse difference between articulate philosophy and simple religion. Germany versus Asia and Greece versus Israel.

I have read a short essay titled: The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette and I have also read Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, and this is in an effort to understand the ominous intellectual origins of Nazism and the world wars and in a similar vein, to understand the German philosophical isms which influenced the German psyche, philosophy and mentality which geared them up for total war and the Holocaust in the early 20th century. Nietzsche is both disturbing and fascinating. To me it’s still a debate or a tug of war between compassionate, kind and good hearted philosophers such as Confucius, Siddhartha Gautama Buddha and Jesus Christ versus the warrior-like, militaristic, nationalistic, bellicose, un-compassionate, uncharitable and basically un-good hearted philosophy of Germany in the 19th and early 20th centuries represented by its philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche. Like the difference between Germans and Indians, are we warriors or are we religious, compassionate and peaceful holy men? I mean the Indian religion Jainism is about extreme nonviolence, in that, Jainists believe that everything has a soul, even plants and so Jainists won’t even eat root vegetables as that would kill the entire plant. Therefore, Jainists only pick and eat the fruit from plants. Jainists believe killing things, even plants leads to bad karma and that nonviolence is the path to enlightenment. Now as I will show you, unlike non-whites, Europeans feel that they have something to defend, their racial features, their beautiful women and their lands etc, which instinctively gives the Europeans a diametrically opposed philosophy or point of view to extremely nonviolent Jainists etc. In fact 19th and early 20th century Europeans with their warrior-like philosophers such as Nietzsche would have probably called Jainists ‘cowardly blacks’ or something as equally politically incorrect. However, I will henceforth prove to you that the Holocaust determines, whether we like it or not that Germany (and Europeans) had it philosophically completely wrong, in that they never had a good hearted, peaceful, nonviolent and religious ism of their own. However, the Ismless + ism being an English philosophy and therefore, an entirely good hearted, peaceful, nonviolent and religious ism, may finally give to Europeans what they have always lacked. I believe racists basically have a warrior mentality or should I say, because of Nazism and the Holocaust, racism is hammered with the warrior mentality. However, does racism necessarily need to be warrior-like? Most importantly, the Ismless + ism removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world, however, wouldn’t it be better to say that we need to remove the warrior mentality from the world? I mean people may still want to be white, however, can they be white or racist in a Jainist-like, peaceful, nonviolent and religious sort of way? It is almost a tug of philosophical war between peaceful and nonviolent East (such as India and China) versus the belligerent and violent West (such as Germany). To me the two world wars and the Holocaust end the debate. Good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent Asian philosophies and religions are unquestionably right.

…the ideas of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, ideas that have spawned horrific ideologies and have proffered a distorted view of the mind, the will, and human nature.

The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette, location 34.

“Bismarck’s unique creation is the Germany we have known in our time, a problem child of Europe and the world for nearly a century, a nation of gifted, vigorous people in which first this remarkable man and then Kaiser Wilhelm II and finally Hitler, aided by a military caste and by many a strange intellectual, succeeded in inculcating a lust for power and domination, a passion for unbridled militarism, a contempt for democracy and individual freedom and a longing for authority, for authoritarianism…”

Bismarck sought to retain authority, not by votes, “but by blood and iron” and “This was the Germany which Hitler resolved to restore.”

The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette, location 94.

Democratism has always been the décadence type of organizing power…

Democracy is the natural consequence of Christianity.

Europe is a collapsing world. Democracy is the decaying form of the state.

European democracy is, to the smallest degree, the unleashing of forces. Above all, it is an unleashing of laziness, weariness, weakness.

Disregard for, along with the decline and death of the state, the unleashing of the private person … is the consequence of the conceptualized democratic state…

Liberal institutions immediately cease to be liberal, as soon as they are attained; afterwards, there are no more mischievous or more radical enemies of freedom than liberal institutions. One knows well enough what they accomplish: they undermine the will to power, they are the levelling of mountain and valley exalted into morality, they make people small, cowardly, and voluptuous, – with them the herding animal always triumphs. Liberalism: that is increased herding-animality.

Democracy represents the disbelief in great men and elite society: “One man is equal to the next.” “Fundamentally we are all self-serving cattle and rabble.”

Equal justice for all – that is the outstanding injustice; for the highest men arrive too soon.

The doctrine of equality! … But there exists no deadlier poison; for it seems to be preached by justice itself, while it does away with justice…

Difference prevails among the smallest of things, such as sperm, and eggs – equality is an extraordinary delusion.

The Press. Let us consider how, even today, all great political events sneak silently behind the curtain, how they are concealed by trivial events and appear minor next to them, how it is long after they have occurred that their dire effects are felt as the ground shakes – with the press as it now is, with its daily wave of hot air spreading dread, exclaiming, inciting, alarming, what meaning can we now give it – is it something more than a perpetual false alarm that leads the ears and senses down the wrong path?

We now face the repercussions of the “great” happenings – the repercussions of the press.

The freedom of the press ruins style, and ultimately spirit.

I am against parliamentarianism and the press, for they are the means with which the herd animal believes it turns itself into a god.

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 979 – 1020.

Let this “Sword of the Spirit” accompany the German warriors and soldiers as they help build a new Europe upon the ruins of an old world, and who keenly understand the truth of Nietzsche’s words which conclude the following selection:

Brethren, war’s the origin
Of happiness on earth! 

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 60.

As you can see from the above quotations, Britain was never quite like Germany. Britain never had a military caste, was never influenced by many a strange intellectual, never had a lust for power and domination, a passion for unbridled militarism, a contempt for democracy and individual freedom and a longing for authority or authoritarianism etc. However, analogously, Europe is like a sinking ship and Germany being a problem child of Europe is the breach in the hull, therefore, despite the fact that Britain was never tyrannical or authoritarian like Germany and in fact helped to defeat Nazism, we are all as European people and nations being analogously taken down to Davy Jones’ locker by Germany and Nazism. We must help them. I am trying to seal that breach in the hull of Europe’s doomed ship. I am using the Ismless + ism to counteract or cure world’s worst ism, namely Nazism. It appears that all those warrior-like and un-good hearted 19th century European philosophical isms such as Nietzscheanism culminated in the 20th century to produce the world’s (or Europe’s) worst ism, namely Nazism. Therefore, my purpose is also to compare these philosophical German isms such as Nietzscheanism with the Ismless + ism to help cement what the Ismless + ism is, as in, is it a religious ism or a philosophical ism? One thing that I am starting to realise about philosophy as opposed to religion, (and what strengthens the evidence that the Ismless + ism is a religious ism), is that some or most philosophies try as hard as they can to be complex, highly advanced and highly articulate etc, however, in doing so, these kind of philosophies simply lose something, I mean they lose their instant or initial simplicity, rationality and understandability. For example, Friedrich Nietzsche’s vocabulary is astounding and I absolutely love his work, it’s as good as Shakespeare, in that the language is so fascinating and educational in its temporal context. However, such immense use of vocabulary does not initially or easily allow the average reader or layman to fully grasp Nietzsche. It is only by completing one of Nietzsche’s books does one gather a deep and overall understanding, but initially it’s hard to understand. I mean such as Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics and Metaphysics are so complex and articulate that they become incomprehensible to ordinary laypeople. For example, Ibn Sina read Aristotle’s Metaphysics 40 times before abandoning it as incomprehensible. In the same way Friedrich Nietzsche has such a treasury of vocabulary, that as a layperson like me, it is hard to initially or instantly grasp him. Unlike good hearted religions, Nietzsche is inaccessible to children. I mean warrior-like philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche may try to sound as complex as scientists, however, philosophy is not real science and what we may need is a philosophy which is as simple, plain, direct and as down to Earth as religion? Philosophy is powerful and paramount because it influences politicians who in turn influence all of our minds. However, un-good hearted Nietzsche may have influenced political leaders in an incorrect or negative way? On the other hand Confucius was unbelievably good hearted and Confucianism was the official state and governing philosophy of China for 2000 years. Some philosophies such as Confucianism and the Ismless + ism are very simple, direct, down to Earth and make complete and instant sense to the general reader and layperson. Confucianism and the Ismless + ism do not mess around, they want you to truly understand them as easily as possible. Confucianism is both a religion and a philosophy and there is sometimes not much difference between religion and philosophy, however, religion never ever tries to be complex or advanced and never ever tries to bamboozle you by being highly articulate etc. Religions wants you understand them as easily as possible. Philosophy may be inverse to religion in that philosophy tries to be as articulate as it possibly can to communicate an overall and general meaning, while religion tries to be as simple as it possibly can to communicate its divine meaning. You must understand that the Ismless + ism is not better than Nietzscheanism, it is simply different in a religious and good hearted sort of way, and perhaps it is simply what we Europeans require this side of two world wars?

“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.” 

Matthew 11:28-30

At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.”

Matthew 11:25

Religion is simple, thick, catholic and universal, in that all ages from 3 years old to centenarians can understand the Christian nativity, which is down to Earth. This is why religion is so good hearted and why philosophy can be un-good hearted? I mean philosophy can sometimes for all intents and purposes be evil compared to universally good hearted religion, because articulate 19th century philosophies such as Nietzscheanism influenced German ultranationalism, two European world wars and the Holocaust etc. The Holocaust may have occurred due to the prevalence of soulless, anti-Judeo-Christian philosophies in Europe, over religion or the deficiency of good hearted religious isms (unlike Asia) in Germany and the European continent? I mean concerning the title of this section (Greece versus Israel), Friedrich Nietzsche talks extensively of Greek culture and rebukes the Jews for their charity, weakness, compassion or what he calls the Jews’ ‘inversion of valuations’, therefore, analogously, what if the Holocaust was a gigantic battle between Greek (European) philosophy and Israelite (non-European) religion? I mean obviously the Germans wanted European culture and philosophy to defeat western Asian religion and influence? Therefore, what if the Ismless + ism is also a battle between Greek (European) philosophy and Israelite (non-European) religion, only that the Ismless + ism wants western Asian religion to be victorious? If religion is good hearted because it is universal and accessible while philosophy can be un-good hearted because it is advanced and inaccessible, this may determine that the Ismless + ism is a good hearted religious ism, as the Ismless + ism is also universally accessible. To reiterate, philosophies such as Nietzscheanism are as articulate as they possibly can be to communicate their overall meaning but lose their instant understandability, and can therefore, only be understood by university students etc. From my own experience of reading Nietzschean philosophy, as a layman and because it is so articulate, I can’t help feeling that I am very thick? Yes! I am very thick! However, that is entirely the whole point of religions such as Catholicism, because it doesn’t matter if you are thick or intelligent, as you can be a saintly simpleton or an evil genius. This might explain why the Nazis were evil geniuses as opposed to saintly simpletons, that is, because they and Germany as a whole were influenced by such anti-Judeo-Christian German philosophers as Friedrich Nietzsche etc? Thick is exactly what religions are, like Catholicism which takes all shapes and sizes, in that you do not have to be special or a genius to be saintly like Saint André Bessette who was illiterate etc. I mean remember even Siddhartha Gautama Buddha was also illiterate. Therefore, was the Buddha as articulate as Nietzsche? Was the Buddha intelligent or good hearted? Therefore, the bottom line is that most philosophies try to be highly advanced and articulate, while religion tries to be as simple and as down to Earth as possible. Philosophy almost tries to be scientific, whereas it should probably try and be down to Earth like religion? This could be why philosophy sometimes has a bad time from the scientific community and why when we say something is philosophical, that it sometimes means that something is not real? However, the Ismless + ism proves that philosophy and religion are every bit as important as science, as science is neutral and amoral, science hasn’t got a heart and will therefore, never save us from moral sins such as the Holocaust. Philosophy is unbelievably powerful because it influences governments and political leaders which in turn influence all of us. However, because philosophy influences top-level governments and politics, it therefore, must always be good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and soft etc. I mean from prehistoric tribes and chieftains to Moses, the Pentateuch and the Lord’s statutes, laws and ordinances etc, our leaders at the top have always instinctively implemented and instituted goodness, morality and justice etc. Only the Nazis got to the top and instituted evil. However, I believe that German philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche who also got to the top-level of influence, were also not entirely good hearted and good natured but were atheistic, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, militaristic and nationalistic etc. Therefore, this comparison helps support the evidence that the Ismless + ism could potentially be a religious ism, as it is as easily understood by 3 year olds as it is by centenarians etc. Therefore, the Ismless + ism is probably as good as a universal religion. Therefore, what I am trying to investigate is that are such highly advanced 19th century philosophical isms, such as Nietzscheanism in some way partly responsible for 20th century German ultranationalism, anti-Semitism and the Holocaust? I mean did articulate and un-good hearted philosophies such as Nietzscheanism make the Nazis evil geniuses as opposed to saintly simpletons? Therefore, did 19th and 20th century Europeans (unlike the Asians) have some kind of a deficiency of good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent religious isms of their own? I mean unlike the British, Germany and Nazism wanted to conquer the whole world, however, unlike Britain, who conquered 1/4 of the globe through liberalism, philanthropy, virtue and ‘the good name of the British Empire’ etc you cannot simultaneously have the desire to conquer the whole world and be good hearted at the same time. This is why I believe central and Eastern Europe unconsciously, subconsciously and nationally produced philosophers such Friedrich Nietzsche, political leaders such as Adolf Hitler, a military caste, a lust for power, domination, a passion for unbridled militarism, a contempt for democracy and individual freedom and a longing for authority and for authoritarianism etc. The British explored, the British Empire acted as an agency for imposing free markets, the rule of law, investor protection and relatively incorrupt government on roughly a quarter of the world, while the Germans just wanted to conquer and subjugate the world. And again, unlike the British who simply explored and traded with native peoples, you can’t have the desire to conquer the world and have a good heart at the same time, and this is probably why Germany collectively and unconsciously created un-good-hearted philosophers, ultranationalism, fascism and militarism etc. On another note, philosophers take it personally when you compare philosophy to science or say that philosophy is not real, however, religion such as Catholicism and the Pope do not give a damn about science, even if religion is a little inaccurate compared to science. Even if the Catholic Church burned free thinking scientists such as Giordano Bruno at the stake, it doesn’t seem to worry about it. So why should philosophers take criticism personally? I mean philosophy is secular, therefore, is this could be why philosophers take criticism personally? Is the Ismless + ism secular or is it ecclesiastical? Well it deals with forgiveness and salvation so why shouldn’t it be ecclesiastical? I mean religions such as Catholicism and Buddhism are about enlightenment and nirvana and science will never be able to poke, prod and test nirvana. Only the devil would hook Jesus Christ up to a polygraph ask Him if He truly is the Messiah?

Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World, by Nial Ferguson, page xix.

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Miocene Adolf Hitler, chimpanzee (arboreal) perched on branch.

Good heartedness.

I will quote at length some Nietzsche and then explain my thoughts about it.

To assert the Teutons were predetermined and conditioned for Christianity, there can be no greater impudence in such an assertion. If it is so, the antithesis is not only true, but also obvious. Wherefrom should the fabrication of Jesus and Saul, the two very Jewish Jews, who may or may not have existed, be more intimate with the Teutons than with other peoples?

A nihilistic religion like Christianity, old and rugged enough to have survived every strong instinct and accordingly sprung out of the people, transmitted itself step by step through other spheres of influence, finally within the youth, and even converted people yet to exist – very odd! An evening blessing including a shepherd and a grand conclusion preached to barbarians and Teutons! How all must be barbarized and Germanized! And in such a way, as those who dreamt of Valhalla know, that all the happiness on earth was found in war!

It hardly seems possible to transplant a foreign myth with continual success without irreparably damaging the tree via the transplant. Perhaps, in one case, it may be strong and healthy enough to eliminate this foreign element through a violent fight, however, it must consume itself sick and withered, or in diseased overgrowth. We think so highly of the pure and powerful core of German character that we dare to expect of it, above all others, the elimination of forcibly implanted foreign elements, and deem it possible that the German spirit will reclaim itself.

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 444.

It might still be possible for the Germans to make an honorable name ultimately out of their old name of reproach, by becoming the first non-Christian nation of Europe; for which purpose Schopenhauer, to their honor, regarded them as highly qualified. The work of Luther would thus be consummated, – he who taught them to be anti-Roman, and to say: “Here I stand! I cannot do otherwise!”

I do not understand how a German could ever feel Christian…

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 584.

The Jews – a people “born for slavery,” as Tacitus and the whole ancient world say of them; “the chosen people among the nations,” as they themselves say and believe – the Jews performed the miracle of the inversion of valuations, by means of which life on earth obtained a new and dangerous charm for a couple of millenniums. Their prophets fused into one the expressions “rich,” “godless,” “wicked,” “violent,” “sensual,” and for the first time coined the word “world” as a term of reproach. In this inversion of valuations (in which is also included the use of the word “poor” as synonymous with “saint” and “friend”) the significance of the Jewish people is to be found; it is with them that the slave-insurrection in morals commences.

All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power,” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews – the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realized that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good; the suffering, the needy, the sick, the loathsome, are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed, for them alone is salvation – but you, on the other hand, you aristocrats, you men of power, you are to all eternity the evil, the horrible, the covetous, the insatiate, the godless; eternally also shall you be the unblessed, the cursed, the damned!” We know who it was who reaped the heritage of this Jewish transvaluation.

This Jesus of Nazareth, the incarnate gospel of love, this “Redeemer” bringing salvation and victory to the poor, the sick, the sinful – was he not really temptation in its most sinister and irresistible form, temptation to take the tortuous path to those very Jewish values and those very Jewish ideals? Has not Israel really obtained the final goal of its sublime revenge, by the tortuous paths of this “Redeemer,” for all that he might pose as Israel’s adversary and Israel’s destroyer?

The dangers of the Jewish soul are:

  • They gleefully create parasitic settlements.
  • They know how to “adapt,” as the naturalists say: through which they have become born actors, like the polyps about which Theognis sang, as they camouflage themselves the color of the cliffs to which they cling.

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 674 – 699.

That Germany has amply sufficient Jews, that the German stomach, the German blood, has difficulty (and will long have difficulty) in disposing only of this quantity of “Jew” – as the Italian, the Frenchman, and the Englishman have done by means of a stronger digestion: – that is the unmistakable declaration and language of a general instinct, to which one must listen and according to which one must act. “Let no more Jews come in! And shut the doors, especially towards the East (also towards Austria)!” – thus commands the instinct of a people whose nature is still feeble and uncertain, so that it could be easily wiped out, easily extinguished, by a stronger race.

A thinker who has the future of Europe at heart, will, in all his perspectives concerning the future, calculate upon the Jews, as he will calculate upon the Russians, as above all the surest and likeliest factors in the great play and battle of forces.

Amid the dramas to which the upcoming century invites us, one is the decision regarding the destiny of the European Jews. The fact that their die is cast and they have crossed the point of no return is now tangibly obvious: all that is left for them is to either become the masters of Europe or to lose Europe as they lost Egypt long ago, where they placed themselves between a similar either-or.

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 718.

What is good? – All that increases the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself, in man.

What is bad? – All that proceeds from weakness.

What is happiness? – The feeling that power increases, – that a resistance is overcome.

Not contentedness, but more power; not peace at any price, but warfare; not virtue but capacity (virtue in the Renaissance style, virtù, virtue free from any moralic acid).

The weak and ill-constituted shall perish: first principle of our charity. And people shall help them to do so. What is more injurious than any crime? – Practical sympathy for all the ill-constituted and weak: – Christianity…

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1594.

The world is neither good nor evil! And so is it with man!

Verily, I say unto you: good and evil which would be everlasting – it doth not exist! Of its own accord must it ever surpass itself anew.

It requires minimal reflection in order to accept the idea that nothing is “good in itself,” that something good must be thought of only as “wherefore good,” by necessity, any good intentions will be viewed as “evil and bad” by opposing intentions: in short, every single thing to which we attribute the title “good,” can also be denoted as “evil.”

False shores and false securities did the good teach you; in the lies of the good were ye born and bred. Everything hath been radically contorted and distorted by the good.

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1647 – 1665.

Man shall be trained for war, and woman for the recreation of the warrior: all else is folly.

Thus would I have man and woman: fit for war, the one; fit for maternity, the other; both, however, fit for dancing with head and legs.

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1691 – 1706.

Exceptional individual men should have the chance to procreate with more than one woman; and individual women, especially those with favorable qualities, should likewise not remain bound to the fate of one man.

Let us be against the ill gotten as we are against criminals: also, let us detest their propagation. This is the first general improvement of custom I desire: it should not be acceptable for the criminals and the ill gotten to propagate.

Another commandment of philanthropy. There are cases where to have a child would be a crime – for example, for chronic invalids and extreme neurasthenics. … Lastly, society here has a positive duty to fulfill, and of all the demands that are made on it, there are few more urgent and necessary than this one. Society, as the trustee of life, is responsible for every botched life before it comes into existence, and as it has to atone for such lives, it ought consequently to make it impossible for them ever to see the light of day: it should in many cases actually prevent the act of procreation, and may, without any regard for rank, descent, or intellect, hold in readiness the most rigorous forms of compulsion and restriction, and, under certain circumstances, have recourse to castration. The Mosaic law, “Thou shalt do no murder,” is a piece of ingenuous puerility compared with the earnestness of this forbidding of life to decadents, “Thou shalt not beget!!!” … For life itself recognizes no solidarity or equality of rights between the healthy and unhealthy parts of an organism. The latter must at all cost be eliminated, lest the whole fall to pieces.

The new problem: whether or not a few people can rise to become a better race at the cost of others. Reproduction…

My philosophy reveals the triumphant thought through which all other systems of thought must ultimately perish. It is the great disciplinary thought: those races that cannot bear it are doomed; those which regard it as the greatest blessing are destined to rule.

The strong of the future. To what extent necessity on the one hand and accident on the other have attained to conditions from which a stronger species may be reared: this we are now able to understand and to bring about consciously; we can now create those conditions under which such an elevation is possible.

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1774 – 1806.

Nietzsche was anti-Semitic and hated Christianity, which to me in an unbelievably simple, thick, layman and down to Earth religious sort of way can only be totally wrong and lead to disaster. Maybe this kind of heartless German philosophy is why Germany or Nazism tried to uproot the Judeo-Christian religion in the twentieth century through the Holocaust? Therefore, another thing that I have learned by reading Nietzscheanism is that unlike religion and the Ismless + ism, as a philosophy, Nietzscheanism doesn’t really sound like it’s good natured or good hearted etc. It’s as if Nietzsche is trying to inspire or stir the German people and the German spirit to nationalistic movement, action, war, victory, triumph, glory and militaristic zeal etc. However, I honestly believe that philosophers and religious leaders cannot be negative, and this is because philosophers influence top-level political leaders, who in turn influence all of us? To reiterate, philosophy influences top-level governments and politics, which means it therefore, must always be good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and soft etc. I mean from Rome to America’s Declaration of Independence and it’s good hearted, liberal, humanitarian and freedom-loving constitution (which was influenced by English philosophers such as John Locke), our political leaders at the top-level have always automatically promulgated and instituted what is good, moral and just etc. Only the Nazis who got to the top-level of national government instituted pure evil. Therefore, to me, because philosophers such as Karl Marx (who influenced top-level governments, revolutionaries and political leaders etc), should therefore, always be very good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and soft etc. Therefore, as you will see by reading this essay and the Ismless + ism, (whether the Ismless + ism is a religious ism or philosophical?) that the Ismless + ism is 100% good natured, good hearted, humanitarian and soft etc. I mean the Ismless + ism is as good hearted as the Christian nativity and Confucianism etc. For example, to me it is abundantly evident that the Asians (who haven’t had two world wars and a Holocaust) have and always have had a good heart or a bigger heart than Europeans and Germans in particular, as demonstrated by such eastern philosophers as Confucius and extreme nonviolent religions such as Jainism, and this lack of a good hearted, peaceful, nonviolent philosophical or religious ism or the prevalence of atheistic, militaristic and nationalistic philosophical isms, such as Nietzscheanism, might be the cause of why Germany was so aggressive in the early twentieth century and ultimately why Europeans had two disastrous the world wars and an irretrievable Holocaust? What is more important intelligence or good heartedness? I mean, as an example and in reference to my first thesis or my 87,000 anti-racist joke about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler also called Time For Forgiveness, clearly intelligence doesn’t matter as much as good heartedness. This is because of for example, my totally foolish idea of attaining innocence and forgiveness by the scientifically impossible feat of time travel to the past, which proves I am not intelligent. However, the essay, especially through its 100 works of lighthearted comical digital art, and because it tried so hard to forgive the worlds most serious sins, was therefore, unbelievably good hearted. I believe lightheartedness is therefore, good heartedness. Therefore, I believe good heartedness should always come before intelligence. Granted racism and definitely Nazism are never good hearted, however, is anti-racism entirely good hearted? Well I suppose it is, however, it doesn’t remove the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. Anti-racism just maliciously attacks and scorns Adolf Hitler without removing the racism from him and the world. Anti-racism is not amicable, therefore, it is probably biased and not all that good hearted. Also, anti-racism is code for anti-white and it succeeds at the cost, suffering and detriment of indigenous white people. I mean are anti-fascists entirely good hearted? I don’t think so. True good heartedness is the peaceful, nonviolent, kind and loving forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and all white people for the Holocaust, not their punishment, destruction, subjection or extinction etc. As demonstrated by such as the frequency of acts of Islamic terror and violence in Europe, such as suicide bombings and beheadings etc, anti-racism is clearly not working and is not the solution to racism and world peace etc. As Europeans you have got to be right, and because anti-racism is anti-white, it means that you are not right. Perhaps the Ismless + ism being neither racist nor anti-racist would make Europeans right again? Again you may say I am thick by having to read a whole book to grasp Nietzsche? Nietzsche has an amazing vocabulary, he is unbelievably articulate and highly intellectual etc, however, I believe religions such as Catholicism and the Ismless + ism are actually a little anti-academic or anti-intellectual because they are and have to be accessible and easily understood by infants and centenarians equally. Religions are, simple, thick, catholic, universal and down to Earth. The Christian nativity is down to Earth. And it is precisely because religions are simple, down to Earth and understandable to children, that makes them so good hearted. The Ismless + ism is no exception. I mean if advanced philosophy and Nietzsche’s amazing vocabulary and soulless, anti-Judeo-Christian ideas contributed to the German mindset, soul and consciousness in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and is therefore, connected to and partly responsible for German ultranationalism, militarism and the Holocaust etc, therefore, what grounds have advanced degree-level philosophy students and highly intellectual philosophy professors, with amazing vocabulary got to defend their field? The Ismless + ism might highlight to philosophers the inverse difference between religion and philosophy. Also, because it is a simple religious ism, the Ismless + ism is therefore, bulletproof, undeniable and unquestionable. You may say how is the Ismless + ism universal and accessible to children, when it’s about the forgiveness of primarily Adolf Hitler? Racists are not funny because they use sometimes hate and basically because Nazism used pure hate etc, however, anti-fascists are also not funny because they also hate white people and they are also violent. Violence is never a solution and to quote the peaceful and nonviolent Mahatma Gandhi, an eye for eye only makes the whole world blind. The ismless + ism is accessible to children because it is good hearted and it is good hearted because it is obviously and ironically funny. I mean you could possibly even imagine some kind of very lighthearted pictorial children’s story book about a bad man and the ‘Ismless ismless ism’ and how it removed the racism from him etc? I don’t know? It just seems universal, simple and very low to me, low enough for children to understand etc. I mean, children might want to hear a good story and how things always have a happy and good ending no matter how bad they are? Children might want to hear how that no matter how bad things are there is always fix? Therefore, children would probably like to know that the Ismless + ism proves that nothing is unfixable? Even the Holocaust. I mean Jesus Christ is our (European) Saviour, He is the Gospel and He is the Good News, however, I believe that because of the Holocaust that Europeans desperately and genuinely need Jesus Christ (our Saviour) to Save us right here and right now. Children (and us adults as well) desperately need to hear Jesus Christ’s Good News again and that how no matter how bad things are or get that everything will be fine because Jesus Christ died on the Cross to Save us all. I just believe that we Europeans have to help save ourselves, in order to actuate and make Jesus Christ’s Salvation happen down here on Earth. Instead of just sitting around twiddling our thumbs and waiting for Jesus Christ to come and Save us. I mean the thing about good heartedness is that it means that religion comes before science. In reality or in prehistory spirituality and religion probably came before science and metal work etc. Science such as physics and mathematics are completely neutral, unbiased and amoral, they have no heart or soul, therefore, they will never contribute to our salvation from such moral sins as the Holocaust etc. I mean the universe is heartless, chaotic, random and entirely scientific, which means that our solar system will heartlessly send a comet or an asteroid our way without a second thought or any feeling of guilt or remorse whatsoever. The fate of the majestic dinosaurs proves that? However, the Ismless + ism being a good hearted religion or philosophy proves that first and foremost that humans come from the heart, morality and goodness, before merciless science, mathematics and physics (and un-good hearted philosophy) etc. Therefore, good and moral religion should come first and heartless and chaotic science should come second.

Wherever you go, go with all your heart.

Confucius.

Volk.

Volkish thought is another example of the inherent Central and Eastern European (or German) ideologies which influenced the Adolf Hitler, Nazism and Holocaust. Volkish ideology was a product from nineteenth century European romanticism. Volkish thought was a reaction to modernity and the rapid industrialisation of Europe following the industrial revolution. “Volk” is a more comprehensive term than “people.” Since, the birth of German romanticism in the late eighteenth century, to German thinkers, “Volk” meant the union of a group of people with a transcendental “essence”. This essence could be called nature or cosmos or mythos, and was fused to man’s inner nature, and represented his creativity, feeling, individuality and unity with other members of the Volk. The essential aspect of Volkish thought is the linking of the human soul with the natural environment, with the “essence” of nature. Thus, to many Volkish theorists, the nature of the soul of a Volk is determined by the landscape. Therefore, the Jews, being a desert people, were viewed as a shallow, arid and dry people, devoid of profundity and lacking creativity. Because of the barrenness of the desert landscape, the Jews were a spiritually barren people. This contrasted with the Germans people who, living in the dark, misty forests, were a deep, mysterious and profound people. Because the German people were constantly surrounded by darkness, they strove for the Sun and were therefore, Lichtmenschen. The word “rootedness” occurs constantly in Volkish vocabulary and obviously the Jews were seen as a rootless people. Volkish thinkers were against modernity, industrialisation and urbanisation and they sought a more natural and agrarian lifestyle and society etc based around peasants and rootedness to nature and the landscape. Large cities such as Berlin were seen as the abode and creation of materialistic and capitalist Jews etc.

This animosity toward the city was an integral part of the rise of Volkish thought. At times it was expressed in the slogan “Berlin is the domain of the Jews,” or in the remark of another writer that “cities are the tombs of Germanism.”

Volkish ideology originated in the nineteenth century, a long time before Adolf Hitler was born, and it penetrated important social and political institutions in Germany before the First World War, most notably the education establishment.

The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 4, 5 and 23

If Volkish ideology had a founder, Paul de Lagarde (2 November 1827 – 22 December 1891) would fit that role. If Volkish religion had a prophet Julius Langbehn (26 March 1851 – 30 April 1907) would fit that role. Lagarde was a conservative political theorist and his anti-Semitism, open hostility to Christianity, racial Darwinism and anti-Slavism etc make him one of the most influential of scholars on the ideology of Nazism. Both Lagarde’s and Langbehn’s importance is emphasised by the frequency of references that were made to them in later Volkish literature. Most importantly, subsequent scholars, educators and politicians thought that they were acting in accordance with the principles that both of these men had advanced. Through the influence of Lagarde and Langbehn, Volkish thought and ideology became a Germanic religion or faith.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_de_Lagarde

The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 31 – 33

Not only was the essential nature of the Jews incompatible with the inner character of the German Volk, but their national religion made them an irreconcilable foreign element on German soil.

While regarding Judaism as spiritually empty, Lagarde attributed conspirational motives to contemporary Jewry.

The Jewish question was therefore not to be met with tolerance. Instead it was reducible to a mortal contest: either the Jewish or the “true” German way of life must prevail in the end. Since Lagarde saw the final struggle as a test of both physical and spiritual strength, he considered it imperative that the Germanic religion gain public acceptance, as only such a faith would infuse the Volk with the strength necessary for victory.

On several occasions, however, he [Lagarde] entertained the possibility that a select number of exceptionally well assimilated Jews might be converted to Germanism.

Any humaneness Lagarde possibly possessed was eventually obscured by his call for the extermination of the Jews like bacillae. This outburst clearly paralleled his advocacy of physical force and violence to crush the recalcitrant contemporary state “like an eggshell.”

Eventually, Lagarde’s thought came to contain the fundamental ideas of Volkish ideology – the primacy of the Volk and the abhorrence of the Jew. However, two contributions to the movement distinguish him as a principal theorist: his overriding emphasis on spirituality, upon Germanic faith that knit the individual Germans into the fabric of the Volk and joined the complex to God; and the outlines of the various forms of anti-Semitism that became the heritage of the later Volkish movement. The first contribution endowed the Volk with a dynamic faith which led the nation to know and grasp its destiny. The second, which accused the Jews of possessing a sterile religion and a consequently materialistic nature, of entertaining an international conspiracy, and of being incompatible aliens on German soil, led to the prophecy of a mortal struggle between Germans and Jews.

The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 38 – 39

The soul was viewed as the essential spontaneous element-and only the Germans possessed a soul, since, according to the Germanic faiths of Lagarde and Langbehn, the Jews had long ago forfeited their souls, whereas the French had lost theirs in a revolutionary conflict.

In Swedenborg’s case, interestingly enough, in addition to rejecting disembodied spirits Langbehn also discarded the Christ-centeredness of the doctrine. This exhibited another tendency in Volkish thought-namely, to substitute the image of the Volk for the person and function of Christ. In Langbehn’s theology, duplicated in other Germanic religions, the Volk and the God of the universe participate in a direct relationship. This distortion of orthodox Christianity was facilitated, it will be remembered, by the earlier popularity of pantheism and various spiritualist cults which stressed the primacy of a Creator whose existence subsumed that of Christ. However, in whatever manner such spiritualistic superstitions were transformed, for Langbehn and his successors the Germanic religion was a mystical union of individual, Volk and cosmos.

Ideas of race played a greater role in Langbehn’s theology than in Lagarde’s. Race and the vitality of nature were viewed as equivalent forces. To support his position, Langbehn quoted Benjamin Disraeli as saying “race is everything.” Consequently, if nature and race are identical, then the Germanic life spirit must perforce be racial. All Volkish virtues, the physical as well as spiritual, were considered nature’s eternal gifts transmitted through blood inheritance. Race was a pervasive and decisive force. The outward appearance of the Volk, as expressed in its physical and spiritual culture, was seen as bearing the imprint of the inner qualities, as the signature of the soul. Langbehn even told his readers that investigations into human facial characteristics were a valid part of historical research. Gone was the possibility that as long as only cultural differences prevented assimilation into the Volk, all who lived in Germany, Jews excepted, could become true Germans. The essentially non-racial anti-Semitism of Lagarde had been superseded; emphasis upon racial incompatibility had become an indelible part of Volkish ideology.

As regards the Jews, there was a distinct intensification of antagonism in Langbehn’s thought. In his earlier writings he had expressed a tolerance of Orthodox Jews living within the boundaries of the German nation. He considered them a separate people who abided by and maintained their own unique law. Assimilated Jews, however, had trespassed beyond their natural limitations and by infiltrating the body of the Volk they were polluting the purity of its blood inheritance. These Jews, identified as the “pests and cholera” had to be exterminated.

In later editions of his [Langbehn’s] book this “finely discriminating” prejudice was obliterated. Instead he expanded the section on the Jews and wrote a condemnation that included all of Jewry. Indeed, he became increasingly obsessed with anti-Semitism.

The Jews bore the brunt of his [Langbehn’s] frustrated hate… Embodying materialism and modernity, the Jews automatically opposed the inner character of the German nation. And that was clearly understandable, for they had become estranged from the vital flow of the life spirit and their souls had petrified. Since they lacked a soul and could not re-establish contact with the life force, it was impossible for them to retain basic virtues like honesty and loyalty. These virtues were part of the “genuine” force of nature which the Germanic race alone had retained and could exemplify. Jews were simply the oppressors and eternal enemies of the Germans.

Thus he [Langbehn] shocked his friends by advocating the subjugation of the “lower” races and the reintroduction of slavery.

In their respective works Langbehn and Lagarde provided a systematic framework for future Volkish ideas. They had sensed that Germany was undergoing rapid change in all areas of life-in society, politics, culture and economy. The two Volkish prophets transformed this crisis, actually the birth pangs of modernity, into a crisis of ideology.

The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 42 – 45

The author’s [Dahn’s] enthusiasm for the Germanic forebears, their beliefs and virtues, eventually caused the Catholic Church to charge him responsibility for a revival of the Wotan cult in Germany.

The eminent sociologist Eugen Dühring only extended Dahn’s passionate identification with the past when, in his bitter book against the Jews, Die Judenfrage (The Jewish Question) (1880), he wrote that the Nordic gods of antiquity were still sentient, vital forces residing in nature as of old. They had endured even through the years of neglect, years in which they were replaced by Christianity. Where men like Diederichs had indulged in talk about a Germanic Christianity, others, who actively longed to recapture the roots of Germanism, displayed a marked trend toward a committed heathenism.

As a central part of this growing paganism, solar occultism experienced a sharp rise in the late nineteenth and the early twentieth century. It played an important role in Diederichs’ thought and had adherents as early as 1848. At that time, C. H. Carus reflected on solar symbolism and attributed the inequality of the races to the fact that some had a more positive attitude toward the sun than had others. A common explanation of the origin of sun worship contended that northern peoples, inhabitants of foggy regions, expressed a natural longing for the sun, which, to them, represented light, hope, and the conceptual center of the cosmos.

Under the Nazis he was a guiding spirit in formulating their racial policy and the author of the violently anti-Semitic book Juden sehen dich (Jews Look at You). He claimed that to Nordic peoples the cycle of the sun was symbolic of life in general, as proved by their own particular experience. During the foggy period when the sun was hidden from man it mirrored a brooding contemplative episode in man’s inner self. When, however, it broke from the clouds, man’s spirit would respond by joyfully and victoriously ascending toward the glowing orb. The gloom of night had given way to the long-awaited festival of the changing sun; again its recurrence had marked the triumph of indomitable and eternal rebirth.

This symbolism of a reborn sun, in which the concept of karma (rebirth) played a central role, was found throughout the increasingly popular ancient sagas. The Edda, a very ancient collection of German legends, portrayed the old religion and its gods with a startling vitality. Indeed, the Edda was an even more popular inspirational source for Volkish ideology than was the Niebelungenlied. Brought out by a number of Volkish publishers, it was a special favorite of Diederichs and his followers. Throughout the 1920’s, the Edda was itself supplemented by a special series of publications devoted to the Eddic religion and world view. Some of these studies transformed Christ into the Germanic sun god and the Virgin Mary into the mother of the Aryans. Others regarded the birthday of Christ as celebration of the return of Baldur, the god of light, from the kingdom of darkness.

The past, which Christianity had done its best to destroy, could be recovered and applied to the present needs of the Volk through occultism. Occultism was the chalice that quenched their thirst, and at the same time made irrelevant anything that historical scholarship might do to show events in an entirely different light.

It was necessary that one become infused with the historical past of the Volk, with the most genuine part of the life force, ancient Germanic wisdom. The wisdom had been suppressed by the strictures of Christianity; indeed, that alien dogma had attempted to eradicate it as a vestige of paganism. But it still existed, permeated with the life force, though in a dormant state.

Like List, the members of this circle equated Germanism and race; the life spirit was identical with the racial characteristics exemplified by the common blood of the German Volk. The emphasis on blood was directly derived from the ancient German cult of the Druids, which this group attempted to revive. By so doing, they hoped to become infused with the primeval substance—though their eccentricity was not insignificantly affected by a desire to flaunt their heathenism.

It was only through the ancient wisdom diffused in the blood, Schuler claimed, that he personally had “lived” antiquity, that he had known it intimately and had actually “seen” the life of long ago. His Germanic blood had allowed him to “see with his soul,” to experience deeply what Christianity with its alien dogmatism had for so long repressed.

The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 70 – 76

Again what I believe is simply, ultimately and fundamentally going on here with the Germans taking up the heathen-Volkish religion and abandoning the Judeo-Christian religion, is that basically the pagan and heathen tendencies of the non-seafaring Central and Eastern Europeans, specifically the Germans, led to them actually trying to undo and extirpate the Judeo-Christian religion from Europe in the twentieth century. This is because of the Western Asian and non-European origins of Judaism and Christianity. I believe all of this heathenism and occultism was in some way designed to gear the German spirit up for war and the conquest of Europe etc. I believe in order to realise their sinister goals the Germans knew that they could not be Christian, as Christianity is a peaceful and loving religion, and so they revived ancient heathen occultism in order to give the German people the excuses they needed to conquer Europe etc. All of this should also prove to you that the Ismless + ism is never a pagan or heathen religion, and as you will see, although it is universal, it is unquestionably Catholic and Judeo-Christian. As evidenced by Langbehn desiring the subjugation of the “lower” races and the reintroduction of slavery, Central and Eastern non-seafaring Europeans simply and clearly did not understand the modesty, subtly and ways of proper European empire, imperialism and colonialism, which all Western seafaring European countries, such as Spain, France and England inherently did. Eastern and Western Europeans differ in this respect. Western seafaring Europeans never openly bigoted the primitive people they discovered and traded with as “lower” races to be subjugated, as they had more modesty, decorum and respect than that. Western seafaring Europeans simply discovered the unknown world, colonised, traded and mastered it to become dominant. Therefore, through this colonial experience Western seafaring Europeans would never attempt to colonise, subjugate or bigot fellow Europeans such as European Jews or Slavs etc. Western seafaring Europeans know what they are doing and how to do it, clearly Central and Eastern Europeans do not. It’s as if the non-seafaring Germans looked at the British and how they had mastered 1/4 of the world through discovery, trade, free markets, a relatively un-corrupt government, the rule of law and the good name of the British Empire etc and somehow wanted to copy that mastery and colonialism, however, they wanted to colonise and subjugate Europe and Europeans. On another note, these two examples of Volkish anti-Semitic intellectuals were much older than Adolf Hitler, therefore, such as Lagarde and Langbehn laid the foundations and groundwork of German anti-Semitism and helped create the mindset, psychology, spirituality and mentality of the German people and German anti-Semitism ready for Adolf Hitler to come and consummate. Therefore, what I am trying to portray is that there seems to be something inherently different, barbaric, pagan and heathen about Central and Eastern Europe as opposed to the civilised Southern Mediterranean and Western (seafaring) countries of Europe, including Greece, Italy, Spain, France and England etc, who seem to be more romanised, Christianised and normal than Central and Eastern Europe, and would thus never produce such pagan religions as the Volkish faith, scholars such as Paul de Lagarde or philosophers such as Julius Langbehn and Friedrich Nietzsche etc. The civilised, Christian and good hearted Southern and Western (seafaring) Europeans would never have even dreamed of such a tragedy as the Holocaust. The British Empire was built entirely on Christianity. There is nothing else. That’s why the British monarchy and the British Empire were so beautiful. The British were never too much. The British never questioned Jesus Christ or Christianity. Ultimately what I would say to the Jewish people after reading about such inherent and virulent Central and Eastern European anti-Semitism, and obviously after the Holocaust, is that despite how the Germans and Nazis bigoted you and made you feel subhuman, racially inferior and basically treated you worse than animals etc, is not to take it personally, because it only reflects your inherent and natural greatness, your genius and your unbelievable goodness etc. The Germans only persecuted the Jewish people because they could not overcome or compete with the greatness, genius and immeasurable goodness of the ancient Israelites and the Judeo-Christian religions. As demonstrated by such as Moses, Albert Einstein and Jesus Christ, for such a relatively small number of people, the Jews are unbelievably great, gifted and good hearted, and I believe that Jesus Christ Our Lord and Saviour represents this and the Jewish people. Therefore, don’t take it personally, take it as a compliment to your boundless greatness, genius and goodness. That’s why they did it, that why the Nazis were so evil, because the ancient Israelites and the Judeo-Christian religion were so good, so genius and so immensely great etc. The deeper the depths of heathen Nazi barbarity and evil, the higher the civility and goodness of the holy Jewish people.

Vanity and warrior mentality.

The sense of a glorious past played a leading role in both the old and New Romanticism.

Antiquity also conveyed the connotation of youth, of the moment of inception, when the pure, unadulterated, heroic, and virtuous qualities of the Volk had been first thrust into history. The aspirations of the Volk in the modern era would consequently have to become reidentified with its heroic past with its youth.

This return to Germanic roots required a focusing, a fixation of one’s vision upon the ancient, tribal Germany, where traditional virtues had remained in tact: “The Germans of Tacitus were the Germans in their youth.”

Where Tacitus was primarily concerned with contrasting the Germanic virtues of fresh strength and endurance with increasing Roman degeneracy, Volkish authors took the contrast at face value and extended the favourable descriptions of Germans to their culture, their racial stock and purity, as well as their religious outlook and mythology.

The Roman propagandist became the prophet expounding the ancient purity of Germanic virtues. In many respects, it was exactly this emphasis on purity that was stressed by the Volkish movement. After all, in Germania, Tacitus had described the Germans as people who had not mixed with other tribes, who, according to modern terminology—precisely the sense in which it was used—had retained the distinction of being a special Volk.

Houston Stewart Chamberlain used such arguments, and as he was the most influential of racial theorists (accepted despite his English origins), what he had to say about Tacitus became normative. For Chamberlain the Roman’s work confirmed the racial purity of the original Volk. As additional evidence, Chamberlain cited Tacitus’ description of the physical homogeneity that distinguished the Germans. From Tacitus unfavourable depiction of the Jews-which the Volkish historians connected with the belief that the Jews were racially impure-was derived the concept that enmity between Germans and Jews was time-honoured and eternal. It followed that the contrast between good and evil, between being German and being Jewish respectively, was indeed enshrined in antiquity and must be retained as a precept of the modern Volk.

If the Goths had been so heroic in antiquity, if they had surpassed such prestigious and powerful nations as Greece and Rome in strength and endurance, then they must have represented an absolute value.

Thus Chamberlain could assert that the virtuous, victorious Germanic tribes had appeared on the historical stage just in time. While Rome was deteriorating in its degeneracy, the heroic men from the North scourged the slothful civilisation and saved humanity.

Rome, the seat of a distinguished civilisation, and Roman power fell to the inheritance of the Germans. Chamberlain only deplored that the Nordic race had not made more efficient use of this power, that it had failed to completely eradicate all the degeneracy that surrounded it, thereby putting an end to the “chaos of the peoples.” In other words, the ancient Germans had unfortunately not established themselves as the sole rulers of the conquered peoples and territory; they had not imposed their superior culture and virtues as the only standards of excellence. That the Germans had inherited temporal power from the ancient Romans was readily accepted by Volkish thinkers, and if the Germans are taken to be the Goths, it was, in fact, historically true. But they did not accept the view held by the early romantics, that Nordic man had also assimilated the cultures of Rome and Greece. On the contrary, it was now argued, the reverse was the case. The Germans had had a unique culture of their own. Had not Tacitus described it? Moreover, their appearance which dissolved Roman hegemony did not signify that they had lain dormant until then. Prior to this time, it was stated, they had influenced human events in a diversity of ways. As the genuine, as the solely pure race of peoples, the Germans, it was claimed, represented all that was creative since the inception of time. From the very beginning, before they had entered history as a group, Germans had affected the cultures of Greece and Rome. This theoretical assertion transformed the ancient Greeks into Germans and divorced modern Greeks from their classical heritage. Similarly, Rome in its glorious period must have been led by Germanic leaders. In essence, the German Volk was like a tree growing from particularly profound roots: it could not inherit anything; it was the sole repository of all creativity and any genius that had ever existed.

The contemporary Germans, in their view, had to reidentify themselves with the virtues that had carried the ancient Germanic tribes to victory over Rome. History was telescoped: the heroic past was transformed into the present to infuse a similar heroism into the modern generation. This process of idealization was especially influential during the period of turmoil that preceded the unification of Germany.

Felix Dahn’s immensely popular novel, Kampf um Rom (Fight for Rome) (1867), illustrates this well.

However, he [Dahn] cannot evade responsibility for having drawn popular attention to a glorified German past in which the mythology, the moral, ethical, and social values, and the physical qualities of the Goths were extolled.

Through its recital of the struggle for supremacy between the Goths and the Romans, it attempted to depict that celebrated national valor which had carried the Goths (used interchangeably with Germans) to victory. In the account of the German conquest of Italy during the Dark Ages, the novel’s protagonist was, in fact, the entire Gothic nation. The blond, manly exterior of these people mirrored a purity of soul, which furnished the sufficient reason for their success (symbolically, the “Italianized” daughter of King Theodoric becomes infected with the debauchery of the Romans and eventually drowns in a Roman bath). Contained within this purity of race were also the elements of honesty and courage which, in the struggle against the rationality and calculating cleverness of the prefect Gethegus, caused the defeat of this Roman. But it was the physical prowess relentlessly employed in the pursuit of victory that distinguished the early Germans from the effete and debauched Romans, and enabled them to serve as models for modern Germany.

Diederichs claimed that the ancient Germanic virtues had been forged, tempered, and strengthened in this mortal and bloodthirsty conflict between the two peoples. Dahn doubtless would have concurred. Indeed, the idealized combat of old rendered more attractive the Volkish idea of the indispensability of the good fight, of the war that steeled the nerves and character of a nation. In a spirit similar to that later in Löns’ Der Wehrtoolf, Dahn praised war as creating the heroes that are celebrated in legends, poems and history.

The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of The Third Reich, by George L. Moses, pages 67 – 70

What I am trying to identify from the above quotes is an inherent, belligerent, violent warrior mentality and instinctive vanity or big headedness of the nineteenth and early twentieth century Germans. There is much talk of the virtues of the past, such as heroism, loyalty, honesty and courage etc, and what I am trying to do is compare this aggressive warrior mentality and its supposed virtues with religion such as the Ismless + ism, which is peaceful, good hearted and nonviolent etc. Unlike India, which has peaceful and nonviolent religions such as Buddhism and Jainism etc, Germany or Europe seems to have lack of such as peaceful and nonviolent religious isms. As mentioned, I believe Europeans instinctively feel that they have something to defend, as in their racial features and women etc, whereas non-Europeans have nothing to defend racially, hence, they can focus on the defense of territory and lands etc. Nineteenth and early twentieth century Germans clearly did not learn from the simple teachings of Jesus Christ such as Matthew 23:12: For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted. This is evidenced by the fact that the Germans and Volkish thinkers always glorified, flattered themselves and ‘bigged themselves up’ against or compared to more southerly people such as the Jews, Greeks, Romans, Italians, Spanish and French etc. The sieg heil is self-exaltation! If you sieg heil, you are exalting yourself! This is what the Germans did, they exalted themselves over the Jews (who humbled themselves to the ultimate degree in the concentration camps etc), as well the more southerly Europeans. Because we know that the sieg heil is simply self-exaltation, therefore, at least we know that there is something we can do about it. Whether we were involved or not, unfortunately, all of us Europeans need to humble ourselves in a huge, fundamental, universal and perhaps philosophical or religious way? I don’t believe anti-racism is the correct way to humble ourselves, as it is clearly not working as demonstrated by Islamic terrorism etc. We must remove racism totally from the universe. I believe religious isms such as the Ismless + ism may be able to help? This is something the British never did, the British were never vain even though they encountered all sorts of primitive people around the world, they did not let it go to their heads, unlike the Germans. The Germans exalted themselves over all other people, even in Europe with such as the French being ‘neither subhuman nor Aryan’ etc, and now in the 21st century as a result of this self-exaltation, Germany and all of us Europeans are subsequently being humbled. As you will see by reading the 11 precepts of the Ismless + ism below, the Ismless + ism is purely and emphatically devoted to the Jews supposed (according to Nietzsche) “inversion of valuations”, that is that the Ismless + ism wholeheartedly believes in and practices the good universal religious values, which all religions in the world teach, such as charity, reward in charity, compassion, poverty is a virtue, helping the sick, needy, orphan and widow, disability or simple good heartedness over evil intelligence, peace and non-violence etc. Again what I am trying to find out is how on Earth did the Germans twist or get their values or ‘virtues’ so wrong? How on Earth, by being so evil did the Germans think or believe that they were in any way doing right or good? Again, it’s possibly the warrior mentality or the virtues of warriorship which they twisted and contorted to suit their needs, and which gave them the required excuses that they needed in order to conquer, master and subjugate the world? What are virtues? Are there good virtues and bad virtues? For example, religious virtues versus warrior virtues? True glory is to be found in the Buddha and Jesus Christ and not in a violent and gory battlefield. There should be nothing wrong with loyalty if it includes the all Europeans and (a little more), and not just the Nordic race. Again honour can be taken in a warrior-like context, but honour does not necessarily have to be violent. Courage also does not have to be a violent virtue. To quote the Buddha, ‘Though you might conquer in battle A thousand times a thousand men, You’re the greatest battle-winner If you conquer just one – yourself.’ The Buddha (Dhammapada verse 103). The Buddha and this kind of religious and nonviolent quotation determine that there are different or good values or virtues as opposed to the bad or warrior-like virtues of the Germans and Europeans etc. I mean even the Romans knew the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, justice and injustice etc, as even the Ancient Romans would never have committed genocide on such a scale of harmless, unarmed and defenceless people. Perhaps it is precisely because the Germans undid the eternally good hearted and unbelievably moral Judeo-Christian religions and the Jewish “inversion of valuations,” such as charity and caring for needy and the sick etc, as to why the Germans subsequently got their own belligerent, violent and warrior-like virtues and morals so wrong? Perhaps it is the instinctive heathenism of the Germans combined with these warrior-like virtues that somehow allowed them to see what they were doing during the Holocaust as in some way good or virtuous? They must have twisted heathenism and warrior-like virtues so much that this somehow allowed them to see evil as good?

DEFENCE.

Leave it to the professionals? The right to write. Justification.

In June 2021 I began my endeavours with SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) to get the Ismless + ism to come up first on Google for the term ‘forgive Adolf Hitler.’ I believe this is important as I believe the Ismless + ism is important enough to warrant properly publishing and promulgating. I have other keywords such as ‘Caveman Adolf Hitler’, which if you try searching for on Google, you will see that my comical digital art webpage comes up first. This is all because of the money and energy I have ploughed into SEO. Please note that the most important keyword phrase for the Ismless + ism is ‘forgive Adolf Hitler’, and that ‘Caveman Adolf Hitler’ is just a secondary keyword phrase to do with my comical digital art. If you think about it, Adolf Hitler himself would probably actually like and prefer that the Ismlessism came me up first on Google for the keyword phrase ‘Adolf Hitler’ itself, never mind the keyword phrase ‘forgive Adolf Hitler’. This is because the Ismlessism is good hearted and kind towards him and not a negative and unforgiving, accurate historical account of him. In theory one good hearted book about the Ismlessism would balance all the other negative historical books about Adolf Hitler. I mean my first (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis as well as all this SEO stuff has got me dreaming even bigger as it gives you confidence to see your website come up on Google, and I have been thinking that my ultimate dream would be to publish a small book titled something like ‘The Ismlessist Manifesto’, ‘Ismlessism: How to Forgive Adolf Hitler’ or simply ‘Ismlessism’ etc. As you know I have experience as I have already wrote an (erroneous) 87,000 word thesis, (which isn’t good enough to publish), however, I believe that the Ismless + ism is good enough to publish, if I can only get the word count up to PhD level 80,000 plus words. The Ismless + ism essay currently stands at 43,000 words, but I am confident that by this time next year I will have achieved my word count goal. I mean you can publish your own book online for a few hundred pounds with a proper ISBN etc, which sounds great. However, I am only a layman who has read 150 + books on a wide variety of subjects, I am not a qualified professional academic or writer and I get the feeling that if I did publish a small 120 page book on the Ismless + ism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, that people would probably tell me to leave it to the professionals? But this is exactly my point, in that there are no professionals or experts on the absolution of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc. There are no experts on extreme or ultimate forgiveness. Also, I am fairly confident that if we just leave it to the professionals that the Ismless + ism and forgiveness of Adolf Hitler will be left for eternity down here on Earth. We will literally wait for eternity for a ‘professional’ to write a book about the genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler and the Ismless + ism, and in reality it will likely just never happen. Why? Because professionals are too afraid of ruining their careers and reputations etc. Therefore, the Ismlessism is justified and I believe I have the right to write and in fact I believe it is my duty to publish and promulgate the Ismless + ism. Hence, this has got me thinking, in that I believe that I may actually be the world’s foremost expert on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler? This is simply because no one else has ever dared to try. In fact, because I deal with and technically forgive the worlds most severe sins, and because using the Ismless + ism to cut the head off the snake (by cleaving the racism from Adolf Hitler) leads to the automatic forgiveness of all other lesser sins by default, such as those committed by all subordinate Nazis during World War Two as well as other smaller-scale sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc, therefore I could actually be the worlds foremost expert on forgiveness itself? I mean there are plenty of wishy washy books out there on wishy washy forgiveness, such as how to forgive your cheating spouse etc, but none of them are authoritative on forgiveness itself. To be authoritative on forgiveness itself you have got to genuinely be able to forgive Adolf Hitler, because that’s what cuts the head off the snake etc. I mean Google has this thing for SEO called E-A-T which stands for Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness. E-A-T is a set of official recommendations for delivering a quality experience online. It focuses on the quality of the content and the creators of that content, as well as the website itself. Basically you’ve got to be an ‘expert’ and ‘authoritative’ for Google to give a damn about your website. However, there are no authoritative experts in the world on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler except me! And I am only an unqualified layman. I mean like I said if we leave it to the professionals clearly it will never get done, because experts and academics are too restricted and limited by taboos and political correctness. Therefore, the Ismless + ism is justified. I mean honestly to write a book, professional academics read about as much as I have read (150 + books) and they are simply expert at producing professional theses with proper references and Ibids etc, and that’s about it. Therefore, if I do publish a small book on the Ismless + ism and I do get criticised for my ‘unprofessionalism’ or told to ‘leave it to the professionals’ you will therefore, be worrying and geeking over nothing more than professionalism, references and Ibids etc, never mind the fact that professionals would never do it in eternity or the extremely important message of the content. I mean did the biblical writers such as Moses have references and Ibids? No! I mean don’t get me wrong, I have completed a dissertation and several papers before at university and I will do my best to reference and Ibid my thesis as professionally as I possibly can, but at the end of the day I am not a professional academic in that kind of technical way, I am a layman who is unfortunately the world’s foremost and eminent authority on the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler.

Serious paradox.

I decided to create this new thesis by coagulating a selection of my favourite posts since 12th April 2021, when I discovered the Ismless + ism. The essay currently stands at 43,000 words, but I am hoping or aiming to get the essay up to (Phd-level) 80,000 plus words so that it becomes a real (2nd) thesis. In June 2021 I got myself into SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) for my website and I have been searching Google for the phrase ‘forgive Adolf Hitler’ and what I have noticed that comes up is so unfunny and so serious. They haven’t a clue how to genuinely forgive Adolf Hitler with lightheartedness and humour. I mean I have two theses now, the first one which you already know is the (erroneous) 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and my second new thesis (or essay as it currently stands) is the Ismless + ism, which actually is the true and genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler. However, true and genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler requires lightheartedness, comedy and humour etc and my 100 or so works of comical digital art are pretty much essential to the whole project. Without the comical digital art my website and two theses would be boring and would not work. I mean it’s seriously funny or a serious catch-22 because you cannot genuinely forgive Adolf Hitler by being serious, therefore, as an expert academic at a university, how could you write a serious thesis that conforms to house rules, with expert references and Ibids etc, about the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler without being comical, lighthearted or funny at the same time? It’s impossible. I mean it’s a serious paradox that universities are not known for their humour, in that universities are generally more or less 100% serious. This means we are helpless with the forgiveness of serious sin, such as those committed by Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc. Therefore, this means that we Europeans are doomed because of the Holocaust and therefore, we will never achieve our salvation. This determines that we lay people should take up serious academic reading, research and writing independently on the outside of formal institutions such as universities. Perhaps the church would consider humour? We will never attain world peace without the true forgiveness and genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler. Even if he is one person and we forgive everyone except Adolf Hitler, we will never attain world peace. This is what seriously unfunny Antifa (Antifascists) need to accept. And remember concerning my other or first (erroneous) thesis, even though time travel to the past is impossible, a joke is a joke! And lightheartedness is all that forgiveness requires. Therefore, I have been seriously dedicated to helping save and protect my people since the 1st of August 2016. I spent nearly 5 years reading over 130 books and I wrote an 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive of Adolf Hitler, which simplified down to one mathematically perfect one word equation, formula or answer, namely, the Ismless + ism. There is nothing more or higher than the Ismless + ism regarding racism. The Ismless + ism is the ultimate and unquestionable answer and solution to the ism, namely racism. The Ismless + ism is a double ism, it is thee ism and it removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. It is bigger than racism and better than anti-racism.

Brown nosing anti-racism and political correctness.

What amazes me about Homo sapiens is that they can overcome mind bogglingly difficult scientific problems such as putting a man on the moon and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard (to quote John F. Kennedy). However, they universally cannot overcome mind bogglingly difficult emotional, spiritual, moral or ethical problems (or sins) such as the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile. It is very hard to forgive the above mentioned, as it took me 5 years of reading almost every day and an 87,000 word anti-racist joke primarily about how to forgive Adolf Hitler not to mention the 100 works of comical digital art. It was unbelievably difficult but my efforts were rewarded with the Ismless + ism, which is the actual forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. That’s the beauty of absolute and universal forgiveness because you just need to forgive the most severe examples (such as Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile) and in theory all other sins are forgiven by default. Those three eternal examples just needed forgiving once and for all time to help save us all. So the Ismless + ism is the hard stuff, it’s hard to forgive Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile, and it was unbelievably hard to achieve, but it’s now done and finished. In theory nothing should be unforgivable in the universe. Another thing about science is that it puts lay people (like me) off from seriously taking up non-career oriented, academic reading and especially writing an independent 87,000 word thesis (on the outside of universities). Honestly, people go to universities just to get told what to read and to get other people to read and grade their writing and that’s about it. The Ismless + ism and my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler (my independent thesis) proves that you don’t need a mark, grade or qualification to achieve your dreams. My thesis justified itself. As long as you write enough words and give it your absolute heart and soul your thesis will justify itself without being marked or graded. I mean if you go to university firstly you are limited by taboos and political correctness and secondly you are taught an orthodox way to do things, however, British lower class society and culture is vulgar, it does not give monkeys about taboos, political correctness, rude jokes or casual humorous racism etc. This is why lower class laypeople are free, different, unique and radical. Therefore, if lower class laypeople take up independent academic reading, writing and philosophising on the outside of universities and not for career goals, but for higher virtues, they can produce completely different, unique and radical works that can change the world. This is because they are not limited by taboos and political correctness or conformed to any orthodox curriculum or way of doing things. People go to university to brown nose their way into a financially successful career, whereas, if as a layman you take up independent academic reading, research and writing, you work purely for virtues, such as mine was always to help save and protect white people. It is impossible to attain the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler through brown nosing your way at university. Speaking on behalf of many (formerly) young white people, I believe many of us drop out kids simply refuse to brown nose anti-racism and political correctness. I mean there are a couple of more things to point out which are, firstly, no one would be allowed or would dare to write a thesis about how to forgive Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile at university and secondly, as mentioned advanced science puts lay people (like me) off from writing about such things as time travel to the past in order to seek forgiveness etc as scientists would (geekily) point out that the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics determine that time travel to the past is scientifically impossible. I suffered from lack of confidence all the way through my 87,000 word independent thesis because of that problem, but I didn’t let it stop me and ultimately it didn’t matter if my thesis was a bit technically wrong as I ultimately attained the Ismless + ism and the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc. However, the thing about science is that unlike religion, science is entirely neutral and amoral, science such as physics hasn’t got a soul or a heart, therefore, science will never forgive us or help save us from moral issues or our sins such as the Holocaust. Obviously don’t take up anything scientific or that requires a laboratory, take up something academic, political, philosophical, historical or religious, all that you need to do is to be able to read and write. That’s how I started, with no relevant qualifications whatsoever. And remember it’s science that puts you off. As a lay person don’t let neutral and amoral extremely advanced science, professionalism and articulate philosophy put you off writing and philosophising independently.

They can’t do it!

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Miocene (Dryopithecus) Adolf Hitler, quadrupedal.

The Truth.

I just wanted to tell you that my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler is a bit like the Old Testament, it’s primitive and not that accurate. We all know that Genesis, the Garden of Eden, Original Sin and The Fall are myths. But prior to 19th century people were convinced about the validity of Noah and the flood etc. Anyway, I have read the Bible three times and I understand the Old Testament, it’s less accurate and less enthusiastic than the New Testament, particularly about the prophecy of the coming of the Lord, the ‘son of David’ and the ‘root of Jesse’ etc. Although the Old Testament touches on or predicts the coming of the Messiah in a blasé way, you obviously can’t be as enthusiastic about the coming of the Lord as much as you can after He has already been and gone, as in the New Testament, which is much more accurate and enthusiastic etc. Similarly, my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler is not quite as accurate about or as enthusiastic about universal forgiveness as the Ismlessism, which is like the New Testament, however, it does touch on the matter now and again particularly regarding forgiveness and my motives to help save white people etc. It’s like a prediction, but you do not really have to read it. I mean we know the Ismless + ism is the ultimate and unquestionable answer to the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and to the ism, namely racism, however, did I truly ask the question(s) can we forgive Hitler? Can we forgive or fix the Holocaust? Is it possible to fix or remove racism? Can we help save white people? Yes I did. But it’s a bit vague and blasé about some of those questions, a bit like how the Old Testament is vague and blasé about the coming of the Messiah etc. For example, I definitely and emphatically asked the question can we forgive Adolf Hitler? I was just wrong at that point or in the way I was proposing. In fact, in the thesis I try to tell you that that is the way to forgive Adolf Hitler, but it’s not. The Ismlessism is. I definitely asked the question (with both my 87,000 word anti-racist joke and one of my online endeavours to fix racism called True Racism); can we correct or fix the Holocaust? I definitely pursued a solution to racism for nearly five years with all my heart and soul, however, I was more like trying to correct it or prove it right than remove it. I always said to myself I wish I could find an equation or formula that is unquestionable that would overcome or prove that racism was right. Well, although a little more anti-racist than what I was expecting, as you know my prayers were literally answered with the Ismless + ism. I definitely pursued and asked the question can we help save white people? I put my absolute heart and soul into my various social media endeavours, my reading and my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about forgiving Adolf Hitler (all in order to help save white people) for nearly five years. That was always my goal, that is, helping to save white people. I was just a little errant. Also, I have to ask the question is my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler actually anti-racist? Yes it is. (Well reversely or in hindsight). It didn’t start that way but it got progressively more and more anti-racist, good hearted, PC and polite all the way through as demonstrated by some of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) Adolf Hitler art works and their attendant speech bubbles, such as, “If life is one and universal, then what does race matter?” Basically the thesis makes the effort to be anti-racist, good hearted and PC by for example referring to Europeans as clumsy and stupid compared to physically adept and skilled Africans etc and it even specifically states that there is no hate or racism in the thesis a couple of times. There are many ways in which the thesis states or proves it is anti-racist, good hearted and PC, such as the apology to indigenous or primitive people around the world for European imperialism and colonialism, and the question that I asked which was: Is Tiktaalik roseae, being 375 million year old tetrapodomorph, inferior to Homo sapiens sapiens? Which I answered with the reiterated statement that it doesn’t matter if an animal or human is primitive or advanced, ancient or modern, as long as they have the relative value. Having the relative value (which is happiness) is all that matters, not being primitive or advanced evolutionarily or technologically. Therefore the difference between all animals and hominins of the past, present and future, in all stages of primitive or advanced evolutionary anatomy or technology is just a matter of relative value. Whether you are primitive or advanced technologically or evolutionarily, the relative value determines it makes no difference. Therefore, Tiktaalik roseae is an important and beautiful creature. Something the Nazis are not. However, was I anti-racist at the time of writing? No. But I made the effort and it got progressively more so. Basically I was just a little blasé about anti-racism. I mean I honestly also have to ask the question was my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler really a joke? Well yes and no. (Again, yes it definitely is in hindsight.) however, I bloody seriously and really meant it. I mean if I wanted you to take the essay seriously you would probably laugh at me for my totally dumb theory or idea of attaining forgiveness by time travel to the past? Honestly, even if you laugh at me for even trying, that’s fine. As long as it makes you smirk, smile, laugh or even roll around in hysterics that should be enough? That is all my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler is supposed to do, that is, make you smile you (to quote Monty Python’s Life of Brian) “miserable old bugger.” I mean obviously the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics determine that time travel to past is a scientific impossibility, however, the thesis was meant to be a time travel joke. I mean what does it matter if time travel to the past is a scientific impossibility, if the thesis a lighthearted joke? I mean come on? A joke is a joke. Give me a break. Don’t be a geek. I just tried to lighten up the worst sinners in history with time and relativity, it was meant to be absolute and universal forgiveness. I mean what if we forgave absolutely everything? What if there were no limits to forgiveness? Therefore, I tried to lighten up Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile (all in order to forgive Adolf Hitler (in order to help save white people)), you know, as in lighthearted, as in a joke? So take spiritual time travel (STT) as a joke and with a handful of salt. Therefore, take whole bleeding thesis as a joke and with handful of salt. Wouldn’t a lighthearted joke be enough to forgive? “No bones!” So there you have it, I did ask the question or those questions, which were fulfilled or answered by or with the Ismless + ism. It’s just that prior to the Ismless + ism, I am a much less accurate and a little less enthusiastic about it, a bit how like the Old Testament touches on the coming of the ‘son of David’ or the ‘root of Jesse’ in a blasé way. The Ismless + ism is much more accurate and enthusiastic, and this is similar to the New Testament. I mean it’s almost as if (by going off evolutionary biologists such as Richard Dawkins and his book ‘The God Delusion’) that the writer of Genesis, that is, Moses, was expected to have absolutely all knowledge from all of time and all at once, in some sort of orgasm. It’s as if Richard Dawkins honestly somehow expected Moses to have evolution by natural selection and Big Bang theory in 1400 BC. The Old Testament is cool. It’s not a geek. It doesn’t care if it’s not that accurate. Similarly, by how I have had some run ins on social media and been banned from advertising on Facebook, I feel like I am or was expected to have all knowledge and answers about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and the Ismlessism instantly and all at once in some sort of cosmic orgasm. Again, similarly my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler is thick, wrong and inaccurate, but the lesson is that a geek would never ask the question can we forgive Adolf Hitler?

Benign.

Racism, especially Adolf Hitler’s extreme and evil racism is like a malignant cancer which is growing out of control in and sapping the very life out of the white race. The Ismless + ism is the completely and 100% benign cure to white people’s cancerous racism. By cutting the head off the snake, the Ismless + ism cleaves and removes the cancerous tumour of racism from Adolf Hitler and the world, which is not only the genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler for the Holocaust, but also the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their countless and individual acts of terror during World War Two. Because Adolf Hitler is the number one sinner in the world and of all time, cutting the head off the snake also means we can probably use the Ismless + ism to forgive all smaller-scale serious sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc, not mention all of our own minor sins. Take the opportunity. Before you go prematurely reacting to the instant thought, idea or concept of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, remember that the Ismless + ism is 100% benign to all people on planet Earth despite race, creed or colour.

The right to forgive?

Do only Jewish people have the right to forgive Adolf Hitler? Not really. Although Adolf Hitler persecuted the Jewish people the most, Adolf Hitler had a go at everybody, as he even considered the French and English lower classes inferior etc. However, most importantly he totally ruined the future and prospects of Europe. Adolf Hitler ruined everything for all white people (including Jewish people) all over the globe as evidenced by such as the plight of white South Africa etc. Adolf Hitler also robbed Western European countries of their overseas empires etc. Whether they want to admit it or not, or whether they want to twist reality and call it a cause for celebration, or be real and admit that it’s a disgrace, white people are losing ground everywhere politically, concerning power and demographically etc, even in their own countries and heartlands etc. In fact, I even sometimes jokingly blame my own personal woes and mental health issues on Adolf Hitler, because if my country and continent were positive, forward and doing well, then perhaps I would personally or individually be positive, forward and doing well etc? Adolf Hitler affects us all. If you are non-white he benefits you, whereas, if you are white he is a scourge and curse to you. So what has Adolf Hitler done to us? It is something fundamental to white people. It is something fundamental to the well being, strength, fecundity, fertility and vitality of all white people. It is the ism, namely racism. Racism is fundamentally broken. And this means that white people are fundamentally broken. White people cannot attempt a single proactive action or step for themselves without the ism, namely racism. Adolf Hitler broke the one and only ism that white people need in order to survive and thrive by themselves. He made white people ismless. Therefore, that is why I am researching and promulgating another very powerful and fundamental ism, namely the Ismless + ism, which is the antidote or cure to racism. The Ismless + ism removes racism both from Adolf Hitler and the world. The Ismless + ism cleaves and removes the racism from the air, atmosphere, aether or space time continuum. Like penicillin, the Ismless + ism cleans and neutralises the bacillus of racism and Adolf Hitler’s disease which is parasitically sapping the strength of and slowly killing white people. I am promulgating the Ismless + ism for the benefit of Europe, all white people and world peace. The Ismless + ism is an alternative to racism, call it the methadone of racism.

Futility.

Are you seriously saying that the Ismless + ism doesn’t matter? Ok, I’ll just pack it up and take the whole thing with me to my grave so that no one ever knows about it. Whoosh! It’s gone! I’m joking of course, however, I do have a point because it’s the very nature of the Holocaust that nothing matters. It’s just too much and no matter how much you plead and cry with the Jews for example, it just doesn’t matter. For example, the term Kniefall von Warschau (German for “Warsaw genuflection”) refers to a gesture of humility and penance performed by West German Chancellor Willy Brandt on December 7, 1970, in Warsaw, Poland, towards the victims of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. However, this type of sincere and genuine humility and genuflection toward Jewish people just doesn’t matter. It’s futile! One thing you have to understand about Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust is that crying doesn’t change anything. Dwelling and sobbing over the statistics and examples of the Holocaust doesn’t change anything. You have to ignore the negativity, stop crying and stay jolly, humorous and positive etc. There are many forms of crying, for example, you could be angry, hateful, scornful, malicious, judgemental, soft, weak or obsequious etc. Germany is crying and sobbing. Britain is crying. Europe is sobbing. In fact, the entire west and all white people are in a way sobbing about the Holocaust. Concerning the Holocaust, it doesn’t matter how sincere you are. Trust me, we Europeans (including myself) are all bent over double trying to fix the Holocaust and make it up to the Jewish people, but it just doesn’t matter how insanely bent double you are, the Holocaust is far more. Or for example, if all of European men promised to marry Jewish women, it just wouldn’t matter. If you sincerely apologised to the Jews for the Holocaust, it just doesn’t matter. Nothing is worth the Holocaust. The genuine absolution of Adolf Hitler and the correction of the root or source of the cause of Holocaust, namely racism, would be quite literally priceless. You just can’t put a price on 6 million lives! For example. without the Ismless + ism, Adolf Hitler could be up there in heaven (bless his cotton socks) screaming and shouting that he’s no longer a racist! But it just doesn’t matter. Now as you will see the Ismless + ism cleaves or removes the racism from Adolf Hitler in eternity, therefore, the Ismless + ism does honestly really matter. To remove the racism from Adolf Hitler is priceless! And pretty funny too. Therefore, the Ismless + ism is a diamond. The Ismless + ism is quite literally potentially priceless.

External academia. Justification.

Because mainstream and orthodox institutions, universities, professors, academics and students etc are far too limited and restricted by taboos and political correctness, which determines that they would never encourage or even attempt to find a solution to racism or the Holocaust, or seek the ultimate absolution of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc, what if therefore, this determines that the Ismless + ism proves that there is a second, separate, external, independent or unorthodox academia, which is only taken up by people on the outside of mainstream and orthodox institutions and universities etc? Such a second academia would not be limited by taboos and political correctness. As I have stated before, when you take up independent reading and writing on the outside of universities, you work for higher or noble virtues such as to do something beneficial for your country and people and not for money or career goals. I mean the Ismless + ism is very simple to discover, it just requires a lot of reading and a practice thesis, therefore, trust me, the Ismless + ism proves that the only reason that it has not already been discovered before is simply and ashamedly because no one has ever tried. Therefore, the fact that mainstream and orthodox professors, academics and students etc would never attempt to find a solution to racism or the Holocaust, or seek the ultimate forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc proves that the Ismless + ism is therefore, justified or justifies itself, which means it is therefore, bulletproof, undeniable and unquestionable. To reiterate, when you write an independent thesis on the outside of universities, it is justified because professionals would never attempt it because they are limited by taboos and political correctness. I mean the fact is that British lower class society and culture is vulgar, it does not give monkeys about taboos, political correctness, rude jokes or casual humorous racism etc. This is why lower class laypeople are free, different, unique and radical. Therefore, if lower class people take up independent academic reading, writing and philosophising on the outside of universities and not for career goals, but for higher or noble virtues, such as to do something for their people and country before they die, they can produce completely different, unique and radical works that can change the world. I mean honestly, non-white people don’t give damn about secretive white lower class casual humorous racism, they only care about keeping racism out of high society and centres of power, such as parliament, universities and the media etc. Obviously there is something in it for non-white people to keep racism out of high society and centres of power etc. I mean I am a lower class Englishman and my first thesis or 87,000 word anti-racist joke about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler started out with a little mild casual racism here and there, however, it got progressively more and more good hearted to the point that for all intents and purposes it became anti-racist. I then gave up on my first thesis and only then did I discover the Ismless + ism. However, I honestly believe that the Ismless + ism is fundamental and good hearted enough to actually get up to high society level, parliament, universities and the media etc. However, the fact remains that the Ismless + ism came from British lower class vulgarity and casual humorous racism etc. If you are in parliament, universities or British high society, as some genuine advice for this life and the next, I would not snootily look down on the British lower classes, society and culture just because they are rough, vulgar and casually and humorously racist etc, this is because the Ismless + ism and external academia prove that we lower classes can do things that you cannot. And remember, in terms of religion and Catholicism we vulgar lower classes are thick, but like Saint André Bessette whom was illiterate, religions prefer angelic simpletons to evil geniuses.

ORIGINS.

How to forgive Adolf Hitler and it how was discovered.

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Lower Palaeolithic Adolf Hitler, flint knapping.

I left no stone unturned, I covered all bases with the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc. The Ismless + ism was discovered entirely through reading and writing. The absolute first thing that I realised is that the problem with white people today is that they are ismless. So white people need an ism. Hence, Ismless + ism. An ism is all things to us. If we want to succeed we need an ism, namely the Ismlessism. Everyone must possess an ism. An ism is strong, only because of the Holocaust, racism is far too strong. Hopefully the Ismless + ism would give white people strength while being more anti-racist? To inform white South Africans that the problem with white people in America and Europe and across the globe is not that they do not care, but that they are ismless, may ameliorate some of their anger towards us for our so called not caring and for our so called betrayal of them; especially the British for the Boer War etc. Without the Ismlessism, you just become angry and frustrated about the Second World War and the Holocaust etc, which for sure are definitely the reasons why white people are ismless. The lesson from World War Two and the Holocaust is that if Buddhists went around killing all non-Buddhists, there would be no Buddhism. Buddhism would become a bad word, like how king was a bad word for the Romans, and no one would be able to confidently identify as a Buddhist. The Buddhists would be ismless. I was worried that the adjective ‘ismless’ would be the best term as it’s shorter than the noun Ismlessism. However, it’s not. Having the adjective ‘ismless’ is like having the noun ‘commune’ whereas the real noun that everybody understands is ‘Communism’. Hence, the Ismlessism is similar to and as powerful as the noun ‘Communism’. I obviously got the adjective ismless first (through praying) and it is definitely needed and required grammatically, however, the idea goes further. Anyone can attain the adjective ismless from off the top of their heads, but you cannot attain an ism or a hypothetical fundamental religion from off the top of your head, you need to add or plus thee ism to the adjective ismless in order to attain the hypothetical religious ism. Over nearly five years I asked the question again and again: Is there anything we can do about the Holocaust? Is there any way to forgive Adolf Hitler? Is there any way we can overcome racism? Is there anything we can do to help save white people? To that end, since August 2016 I have read almost every day, and as of the date that I discovered the Ismless + ism, that totalled over 130 books (over 150 in my life), all entirely devoted and focused on the singular purpose of fixing the ism, namely racism and helping to save white people. I tried four different methods or ideologies to solve racism on social media, including:

Generalisation. This is how I started on social media, when I was a dumb mild racist. Generalisation was a completely incorrect ideology or philosophy of generalising all non-white or Muslim people for individual acts of terror etc. It was totally wrong and I completely and humbly admit that.

Kryptonite. I tried an alternative term for the noun racism, by always calling the term racism ‘kryptonite’, as in racism is kryptonite to white people. I learned humbleness through kryptonite but nothing much more. Kryptonite was a failure and unbelievably un-academic. I was completely wrong and I humbly admit that.

True racism. I have never been anti-Semitic and true racism was my absolute best effort to both appease Jewish people and forgive Adolf Hitler ‘at the same time’. For example, true racism was by definition never anti-Semitism because if it was it wouldn’t be true racism, and true racism was by definition never anti-racism because if it was it wouldn’t be true racism? This attempt was a bit better, but probably a bit fascist, hence, it was a failure, completely wrong, unacceptable and I totally and humbly admit that.

Time for forgiveness. This was the 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler. The first and probably only thing you need to know about this thesis is that it is light. By this I mean the thesis sheds light on the deepest darkest crevices known to humanity. Basically, the thesis goes where no one has gone before. The thesis through its art lightens the heaviest of burdens known to humanity. The only other thing you need to know is that only a fool would write this thesis, I mean only a fool would seriously investigate how to forgive Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile. However, there must be something to foolishness as the thesis was ultimately successful with the discovery of the Ismless + ism, which is the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. This thesis was the true question that I asked. I asked is there a way to forgive Adolf Hitler? Is there a solution to or any forgiveness for the Holocaust? Is there a solution to racism? Is there any way to help save and protect white people? All of which is pretty much the same question. I put my absolute heart and soul into this thesis over more than a year. I must have read all 87,000 words of it a thousand times. I must have put hundreds of hours of time and energy into creating the digital art. The thesis was titled Time For Forgiveness and it was supposed to be absolute and universal forgiveness with time and relativity. For example, because Adolf Hitler cared so much about racism and (quote) “subhumans” wouldn’t he be forgiven if he traveled back in time and made himself equal to a “subhuman” such as Australopithecus africanus?

Pliocene (Australopithecus africanus) Adolf Hitler, using tools and feeding. Caveman, prehistoric man, subhuman, monkey, ape, primate, animal.
Pliocene (Australopithecus africanus) Adolf Hitler, using tools and feeding.

And because Jeffrey Dahmer was a cannibal in the 20th century, wouldn’t he be forgiven if he traveled back in time and equated himself to such as Homo antecessor, who was also cannibalistic?

Lower Palaeolithic Jeffrey Dahmer, (Homo antecessor), with human femur. Caveman, prehistoric man, subhuman, monkey, ape, primate, animal.
Lower Palaeolithic Jeffrey Dahmer, (Homo antecessor), with human femur.

Therefore, because Jimmy Savile was a statutory rapist in the 20th century, wouldn’t he be forgiven if he either went back in time to before 1875 AD, (as the age of consent was 12 years old in Britain until then), or before 1275 AD, (as there wasn’t an age of consent in England until then)?

Victorian (pre-1875) Jimmy Savile, with top hat and tail. Medieval, ancient, Victorian.
Victorian (pre-1875) Jimmy Savile, with top hat and tail.

Anyway, the thesis was just meant to be a lighthearted joke, but it was probably wrong and unacceptable, all of which I once again completely, truly, deeply and humbly admit. The thesis hung on the idea of time travel to the past, which is a scientific impossibility, therefore it was kind of a guess. To reiterate, the thesis is scientifically impossible, and you do not really have to read it. But remember it is a joke! I mean please don’t get all geeky and scientific about how the second law of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics prove that time travel to the past is impossible. Come on? Give me a break. It’s only a joke! For example, I do not know if time travel to the past in the afterlife to seek relative innocence and forgiveness technically works, however, I do know that time travel to the past to seek relative innocence and forgiveness works with humour. Therefore, what does it matter? Hence, I don’t believe it is the question that matters, the point is that I humbly and sincerely asked the question that no one has ever asked before, namely is there any way we can forgive Adolf Hitler? All that matters is the answer, which I subsequently attained through abandoning the thesis. The Ismless + ism is actually the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. So it was a dumb question but a smart answer. Just to explain a bit more so you don’t have to read it, the thesis is all about forgiveness, it is 110% forgiveness. I put absolute heart and soul into this thesis for more than a year. I must have read it a thousand times if I read it once. It is my absolute all for forgiveness. However, the thesis is not that good, it is just all that I could imagine at the time to forgive Adolf Hitler, that is, time travel to the distant past and equivalence to a real (quote) “subhuman” such as Australopithecus africanus etc. I just thought that would lighten him up? I mean for example, the thesis asks the question how was ancient cannibalism fine for Homo antecessor 800,000 years ago, but modern cannibalism totally heinous for Jeffrey Dahmer in the 20th century? Is crime relative? Is it something to do time or time travel? Is it something to do with states of being primitive and advanced? Is primitivism innocence and advancement guilt? Basically the essay is a 87,000 word investigation into that question. Basically if Homo antecessor were innocent with their cannibalism 800,000 years ago, would it ameliorate Jeffrey Dahmer’s sins if (in theory and in the afterlife) he travelled back in time to the Lower Palaeolithic and equated himself to such as Homo antecessor?

Early Pleistocene (Paranthropus robustus) Adolf Hitler, butchering baboon. Caveman, prehistoric man, subhuman, monkey, ape, primate, animal.
Early Pleistocene (Paranthropus robustus) Adolf Hitler, butchering baboon.

However, in light of the Ismless + ism which is the real forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, I can see that the thesis is not that good. In the light of the Ismless + ism I now believe that sinners do not have to travel back in time to attain innocence and forgiveness etc, however, time travel to the past for sinners is still bloody funny! And I think that’s about all that matters? I mean when I think about it, the thesis is 100% original, excepting a few quotes, this is 87,000 original words, that came out of absolutely no where, except from insights from my reading. Honestly, the entire thesis came out of thin air. Looking back at it exhausts me, I don’t know where I got the energy from. Therefore, being a 100% original 87,000 word thesis that came out of nothing, I believe the thesis is simply better than nothing? The thesis is simply a leapfrog or stepping stone to the Ismless + ism, which it earned. Therefore, to reiterate, the thesis is all about forgiveness, it is 110% forgiveness, and it is my absolute all for forgiveness! It’s just not as good as the Ismless + ism. However, that is not the point. The point is that it is the proof that I did ask the question. It proves that the Ismlessism, being the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler was not luckily attained from off the top of my head. To reiterate, the thesis is scientifically impossible, and you do not really have to read it, however, it is not what matters, only the Ismless + ism matters. Therefore, it’s not the question that matters, only the answer. Hence, I wrote the 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler over one and a half years, I must have read it a thousand times and put hundreds of hours into the 100 works of digital art, however, ultimately, I came to see the error of my ways and completely gave up. I deleted everything and just kept an offline backup. Then, and only then did I attain the perfectly correct one word answer to racism, namely the Ismless + ism. The Ismless + ism is actually the true forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. A coincidence? Never! If you believe anything, believe that the Ismless + ism is the perfect one word answer. Don’t try to rationalise it, or look at it scientifically, I only earned it by reading over 150 books, trying four methods to solve racism on social media, including writing the 87k word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler, giving up, converting to Catholicism and by praying the Rosary every day. I have the proof that I wrote the 87,000 word thesis with 100 unique works of comical digital art in the menu on my website. But remember you do not have to read it!

Victorian (pre-1875) Jimmy Savile, with cane. Medieval, ancient, Victorian.
Victorian (pre-1875) Jimmy Savile, with cane.

All deeply embarrassing and very humbling experiences all of which ultimately failed. However, God clearly loves a trier because I then gave up on the thesis and everything else, I unofficially converted to Catholicism and began to pray the Rosary every day, and then miraculously all of my prayers were answered when during my prayers I realised that white people are ‘ismless’, which I thought was a pretty good term, however, then subsequently through reading, prayers and designing this website, I attained the noun Ismlessism. Instantly I knew I had a religious ism like Buddhism (only without the nirvana). After all of that I truly believed that I deserved the Ismlessism. The lesson is never give up, even if you try four different dead in the water, year-long projects you will get there in the end. The Ismlessism is the perfect answer to the ism, namely racism. Therefore, that is how to create an ism and found a hypothetical and fundamental religious ism, through reading, writing and praying. The adjective ismless is not a religious ism. Unlike the noun Ismlessism, the adjective ismless is not capitalised and does not produce the noun Ismlessist which can also be an adjective.

To reiterate:

The Ismlessism is the full noun.

The Ismlessism is proper.

The Ismlessism is double.

The Ismlessism is thee ism.

The Ismlessism is a religion.

The Ismlessism is the formula.

The Ismlessism is the answer.

The importance of writing, (externalising and piecing together words and phrases).

It may come as a surprise to you that I did not attain the Ismless + ism in my head. I did however, attain the adjective ismless in my head, during a Rosary prayer I was thinking about Catholicism and how it is an ism and then subsequently I suddenly had the thought that white people are ismless. However, the best things actually come together or are pieced together accidentally and externally on your computer screen, through writing, testing and experimenting with the titles and tag lines of your website etc. There are things that you cannot imagine in your head that piece together accidentally through writing and testing on your screen etc. Hence, I discovered the Ismless + ism by testing the tag line on my website with a Hindu head banner, symbol and art etc. And to be honest I almost didn’t do it or test it. I thought that adding an or thee ism to the adjective ismless would be a silly idea. However, one thing that I have definitely learned through my 5 year long endeavour to fix racism etc, is that you never know something until you try. Therefore, it was this notion that made me lean forward and expend the energy to test and add thee ism to the adjective ismless. It was the best decision I have ever made in my life. I literally added thee ism onto the adjective ismless, visually in front of me on my iPad screen, and that’s how I instantly knew I had something or it. I knew the Ismlessism was something good, but I wasn’t sure exactly what it was and it only unraveled itself to me over a few hours on the 12th of April 2021 via several posts that I wrote about it on that very night. For example, I didn’t know instantly that the Ismlessism was the solution to racism. That only happened a few hours after I had externalised and discovered it on the iPad screen. Check my early posts on my website, the dates and times are all there. And it just got better and better through more posts. Also, I didn’t know it removed and cleaved the racism from Adolf Hitler for a couple of weeks etc. So therefore, don’t sit around meditating thinking you are going to attain enlightenment or the secrets of life, you have got to externalise your thoughts via writing and accidentally piece together new words and phrases on your computer screen. And remember it took 87,000 words of this testing and experimenting with words and phrases to get one fundamental word. Therefore, you have got to write a thesis to attain anything.

I read, I pray, I DJ.

You may be asking who the hell is this lunatic claiming to know the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and to be forming a new hypothetical fundamental religion? Well, you’d be right about one thing, I am a lunatic, well, actually a certified schizophrenic, but that doesn’t mean you have to shun me or be afraid of me, it just means I can’t work. My name is Graham Cammock, and as of 2021, I am a 40 year old, British and disabled (schizophrenia) white person and I am trying to remove all racial hatred and anger from the world. As I said I can’t work, every day I get up and I read, I write, I pray and I DJ, and that is how the Ismlessism was discovered. The Ismless + ism is a hypothetical, syncretic, anti-racist and fundamental religion, however, my real religion is Catholicism and that’s where the real magic of the Ismlessism comes from. However, when I attained the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler after 5 years of reading, writing and effort, (aka the Ismless + ism), I instantly knew I had a religious ism like Buddhism (only without the nirvana). Therefore, imperatively you need to know that I don’t care one iota about attaining nirvana. You need to know that I don’t care about anything except my own people and my continent. I don’t care about anything except the Ismlessism, as I know that white people are doomed without an ism in one form or another. You would probably call me a racist for caring about white people yeah? That ain’t the half of it. Read this entire essay and you will see how much I care about white people. To reiterate, I am just the fool who wrote the 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and subsequently discovered the Ismless + ism. We attain the hypothetical religion, by making Adolf Hitler the Ismlessist and the rest of us just identifying as an Ismlessist. Therefore, I am not a mild racist (anymore) just because I devoutly care about white people. Having the singular desire to help save white people and not caring a less about anything else like nirvana is an unbelievably modest desire. I am an avid reader, devout Catholic and non-aspiring DJ. I like trance and techno music. You can listen to my mixes via the menu on my website. An Ismlessist believes that the discoverer of the Ismless + ism, (myself), attained the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler after having spent nearly 5 years reading over 130 books and that I (the fool) wrote an 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler, which simplified down to one perfect or precise one word equation, formula or answer, namely, the Ismless + ism.

The Explanation.

So you know that I am a schizophrenic? Honestly, all that means is that for X,Y and Z and for things that you shouldn’t really need to know about my child hood, such as homosexual abuse, is that I had a full and complete mental breakdown in 2006 to 2007. As a child I was homosexually abused for years and because of that I was a slightly rebellious and humorously mischievous sort of a child and teenager and not very studious at all. Anyway I was expelled from a very prestigious private boarding school called Barnard Castle School in 1998 at age 16 for smoking marijuana. Now what I want to say here is very important because I think it has some bearing on serious sinners such as Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer, Jimmy Savile and in fact all criminals etc. At Barnard Castle School I was one of the cool kids and I was very popular, and like everyone else at Barnard Castle School, I was an angelic child, I was a real good guy, I didn’t have a bad bone in my body and I had an unbelievably good heart. I just didn’t study. However, after expulsion something happened to me that even today I can’t fully explain. Less than a week after expulsion, the grind and reality of life on the outside of Barnard Castle School kicked in and I literally felt my good soul, my good looks and my good heart wrenched away from me permanently. I lost my girlfriend and all of my lifelong best friends within a fortnight of expulsion. Barnard Castle School is like a little world of its own and life in that school is entirely good hearted, I mean the whole school and everyone in it is unbelievably good hearted. However, after expulsion, because within a week I felt my heart, soul, popularity and looks taken away I became permanently and eternally sad, and I think I became permanently not good hearted, possibly even evil. I mean I think what sealed my fate after expulsion was because of my homosexual abuse from 1985 to 1989, I always had a phobia of public speaking and after 8 years of severe anxiety (after expulsion) and not being confident enough to work etc, in 2006 to 2007 I had a full mental breakdown, losing complete control of myself and all of my rational faculties etc. I became psychotic and possibly evil. This happened because of after my abuse and expulsion, I knew I couldn’t make it in life. All that you need to know is that it took a long time for me to come out of my psychosis after 2006 to 2007. (And by the way I somehow managed to have a daughter in 2005 just before my mental breakdown). Anyway, I was sectioned in June 2012 for two months which was the absolute best thing that ever happened to me in my life, because it got me up and forward, it gave me medication and disability benefits, which enabled me to start reading and writing in August 2016 and ultimately to discovering the Ismless + ism in April of 2021. What I mean to say about my example is that there is something that happens to angelic and good hearted children such as abuse and expulsion which knocks children, it removes their good hearts and turns them down the path of psychosis and evil etc. And please bare this heartless fact of life in mind for such as Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer, Jimmy Savile and all criminals as well. I mean at a cost of roughly £21,000 a year, life on the inside of Barnard Castle School is a very good hearted paradise, and the reality or grind of life on the outside of Barnard Castle School (especially in East Durham) is basically malign and not good hearted at all. That’s possibly class difference? If the whole world was like Barnard Castle School, the whole would be good hearted, loving and very little would go wrong. At the point of expulsion, life wasn’t good to me and I hadn’t done anything wrong in the first place, therefore, why should I be good to life? I believe all serious sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Ian Huntley may get a similar knock in life as children which removes their good hearts and sends them down the psychotic and evil path etc? Anyway, for an example of schizophrenia, I think gave up on chasing nirvana in Berwickshire, Scotland in 2014 on a golfing holiday, and that was one of the first steps out of my psychosis, paranoia or schizophrenia. What does it mean to be schizophrenic? To be a schizophrenic means that you are incapacitated because you have seen the other side of life or the dark side of life. Trust me, I have seen hell. Psychosis is like having a bad dose of purple haze except in a hellish and terrifying nightmare sort of way. Voices attack you, nothing is real, you believe in a fantasy and you believe, hear and see things that are just not real. What bothers me is that it’s almost as if having a mental illness to some people is a fashion accessory these days, but again, trust me a genuine schizophrenic doesn’t want any help, for example I had to be violently restrained and arrested by a policeman to be sectioned in 2012. I didn’t want the stigma of medication and disability benefits, and that’s how the NHS mental health team know that I am a genuine case of schizophrenia, because I violently resisted sectioning, medication and benefits etc. It’s a catch-22. Basically I had to be violently sectioned to get me to accept medication and disability benefits which was actually brilliant! And trust me, you do not want to see hell or dark side of life. Once you have seen the psychotic side of life you are never quite the same. You are never the nice and angelic human being that you thought you once were as a child. Unfortunately I know exactly what it is to be a psycho. During my mental breakdown in 2006 to 2007 I pulled some unbelievably embarrassing and very shameful stunts, however, thankfully I didn’t commit any real or serious crimes. The lesson is don’t have a mental breakdown deliberately or otherwise (as in my case), as there is not really any coming back from a full psychotic breakdown. Trust me once you have been given plastic knives and forks to eat with and had to be monitored while using a razor to shave etc, it is impossible for you to trust yourself ever again. Therefore, what I am getting at by revealing all this dark side stuff to you is that, having my mental breakdown in 2006 to 2007 and seeing or going over to the dark side of life are the reasons why I was able to see Adolf Hitler’s, Jeffrey Dahmer’s and Jimmy Savile’s side of life. I mean seeing the other side of life enabled me to understand and investigate the forgiveness of serious criminals such as Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc. And I also believe that the explanation of the knocks I took in my life and my schizophrenia etc may also be an explanation for serious sinners such as the above mentioned. Anyway, that is how I was able to discover the Ismless + ism and a way to forgive the above mentioned, hopefully, for the betterment of all Europeans and the whole world at large etc.

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Upper Palaeolithic Adolf Hitler, cave painting.

RELIGION.

Hypothetical and fundamental religion.

Regarding the Ismless + ism potentially being a hypothetical religion, please note that it may not have to be, it may just be a political or philosophical ism like Communism? However, I am devoutly Catholic and I pray every morning God sends, hence, I have a predilection for religion. I have read many books about various religions and how I discovered the Ismless + ism was entirely through a religious experience, that is, through unofficially converting to Catholicism and praying the Rosary etc, hence the Ismless + ism came from religion but not entirely so. I mean as the Ismless + ism deals with salvation and forgiveness hence it could be an aspect or branch of Catholicism or Christianity? However, again it could just be political as in anti-racism, populism or Communism? I just prefer and I am more comfortable with a religion as opposed political parties. It’s a case of whatever works best? However, for now please just humour me while for this essay or this thesis I treat the Ismless + ism as a new, hypothetical, syncretic and fundamental religion. The Ismless + ism is potentially a hypothetical, syncretic, (neither racist nor anti-racist) and fundamental religion, that is, through the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, about the forgiveness and well being of all white people. As Sasha Baron Cohen would say, the Ismless + ism is a new hypothetical, (neither racist nor anti-racist) and fundamental religion for make benefit glorious continent of Europe. What is the Ismless + ism? Firstly, you need to know that I am developing the Ismless + ism entirely from my own example, because I am the individual who discovered it, therefore, although like the Christian nativity, it is as relevant to 3 year olds as it is centenarians, it is an intellectual, academic but non-scientific religion. This is because it was entirely attained through reading, praying and writing etc. Like myself, the Ismless + ism is a syncretic religion as it borrows many precepts, morals, beliefs and concepts from many other religions. For example, although I personally prefer 100% masculine monotheism, however, you can be any type of religion such as polytheistic, atheistic, animist or totemistic etc as well. I mean I believe you don’t have to identify as a 100% Ismlessist, for example, I am definitely Christian but I also learn from and use Judaism, Buddhism, Islam, Taoism and Confucianism etc. Therefore, I believe that I am a Christian or Catholic Ismlessist. Therefore, I believe you can be a Hindu Ismlessist or a Buddhist Ismlessist or a Muslim Ismlessist etc. I mean if you want to you could also identify as an Ismlessist politically or philosophically, much like how people identify as a racist, anti-racist, Communist, Nazi, conservative, liberal or fascist etc. I just prefer religion to any of those political or philosophical isms because they were the cause of the Holocaust. Therefore, although I am a Christian Ismlessist, what do I take from other religions? If you read the 11 precepts further below you will get a good idea, however, here is a list:

Christianity – 

  • Compassionate charity.
  • Reward in charity.
  • Poverty is a virtue.
  • Asceticism.
  • The moral that as opposed to a super rich Pharaoh who thought he was a god, that Jesus Christ, being true God and King of the universe was born in a humble manger.
  • Masculine monotheism.
  • Ultimate salvation of Europeans.
  • Prayer.
  • Prophecy.

Catholicism – 

  • Disability or the fact that you can be a saintly simpleton such as St. André Bessette, who was illiterate or an evil articulate genius such Nietzsche.
  • The fact that Catholicism takes all shapes and sizes, in that (to quote Monty Python) ‘you don’t have to be a six footer and you don’t have to have a great brain’ etc.
  • The concept of Sainthood.
  • The communion of Saints.
  • The fact that you don’t have to attain nirvana or enlightenment to be venerated or a Saint etc. 

Buddhism – 

  • Compassionate charity.
  • Reward in charity.
  • Poverty is a virtue.
  • Asceticism.
  • Moderation.
  • The Middle Way.
  • The moral of the Buddha’s Great Renunciation, that is, from royalty to an ascetic who nearly starved himself to death to nirvana and enlightenment.
  • Meditation.
  • Mindfulness.

Jainism – 

  • Nonviolence.
  • Peace.

Judaism – 

  • Choseness of the Jewish people.
  • Compassionate charity.
  • Reward in charity, for example, charity to the widows and orphans.
  • God, the Lord and YHWH.
  • 100% masculine monotheism.
  • Prophecy.
  • The fact that you don’t need to attain nirvana or enlightenment to attain an ism.

Islam – 

  • 100% and absolute masculine monotheism.
  • Prophecy.
  • Mercy.
  • The fact that you don’t need to attain nirvana or enlightenment to attain an ism.

Taoism – 

  • Symbolism.
  • Mysticism versus fundamental religion, in that Taoism is an ancient mystical religion which is imprecise yet it has over 1500 texts, doctrines and dogmas etc, whereas the Ismless + ism is a modern religion which is fundamental yet it is only one word.
  • The fact that you don’t need to attain nirvana or enlightenment to attain an ism.

Confucianism – 

  • Filial piety, reverence for and deference towards one’s parents, elders and superiors.
  • Devotion to education.
  • Zealously over-strict East Asian mothers regarding the education of their children called ‘tiger moms’.
  • The fact that those children who excel in East Asia are the ones who are admired, while in the West, such kids are labelled “nerds” while the cool kids smoke in the toilets etc.
  • Virtue before money or profit.
  • The fact that Confucianism is almost as big as Buddhism or Christianity without attaining nirvana.

In some respects, we could even say that the quest for learning was a form of enlightenment to Confucius. The Buddha may have discovered the answers to life while meditating under a bodhi tree; Confucius sought his nirvana in books of poetry, history, and philosophy.

Confucius: And The World He Created, by Michael Schuman, location 2957.

Drugs are not a religion.

It’s strange because I used to go clubbing when I was in my late teens and early twenties, places like Gatecrasher in Sheffield and Ibiza, and I think all of us pre-millennium clubbers, especially during the super club explosion in the U.K. during the nineties, kind of thought that clubbing was kind of our adult religion? I mean I did some stupid things as a kid like drug driving. Once when I was about 20 a police man pulled me over for speeding and I was shamefully high on ecstacy. I was petrified. However, the policeman just gave me a lecture about speeding and then gave me “an early Christmas present” and sent me on my away. I have never been so relieved. However, despite the fact that the dance music industry is a billion dollar industry, it’s that kind of thing that proves that clubbing and drugs are not religion. I mean clubbing and drugs are not universal and you cannot teach them to children and infants. Clubbing is an underground, dark and seedy world of drugs, bouncers, gangsters and club owners etc, and it has to be hidden from children. To children it’s a secret. Real religions are in the daylight, they are sober and universal, they hide no secrets from toddlers. So what evidence is there that the Ismless + ism is a fundamental religion? Well like the Christian nativity, it’s sober, good hearted and universal. Despite the fact that it deals with the absolution of Adolf Hitler, it can be taught to 3 year olds, centenarians and everyone else in between. Therefore, that is some proof or evidence that the Ismless + ism could be a hypothetical and fundamental religion? As mentioned I am not 100% sure if the Ismless + ism really religious or political or philosophical? It may be a personal choice? Anyway, the deal is that the ismlessism is a universal (neither racist nor anti-racist) religion, however, the stipulation is: 

  • As long as Adolf Hitler is the Ismlessist and believes in and professes the Ismlessim he is forgiven, therefore, Antifa have to calm and stop their violence towards white people (and those who want to be white Ismlessists) and forgive Adolf Hitler also. The Ismlessim removes racism from Adolf Hitler and therefore, the Ismlessim is the complete and humorous forgiveness of Adolf Hitler that leads to the forgiveness of all white people and to their being admired and even loved by non-white Ismlessists.
  • Non-white Ismlessists have to lose the desire to want to destroy, conquer and master Europe, Europeans or white Ismlessists.

The Ismless + ism is a ‘non-nirvana’ seeking (that is a non-Buddha/Christ seeking) fundamental religion, potentially like Hinduism, Confucianism, Jainism or Taoism etc. Through an 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler, I asked the question is it possible to forgive Adolf Hitler, fix racism and help save white people? The Ismless + ism is the one word formula, equation or answer. The Ismless + ism is bigger than racism and better than anti-racism. Because the question was asked, an Ismlessist believes that the Ismless + ism is the ultimate answer. An Ismlessist believes that the Ismless + ism proves that the universe always has an answer for those who sincerely and humbly ask, even for the Holocaust.

“Ask, and it will be given you. Seek, and you will find. Knock, and it will be opened for you. For everyone who asks receives. He who seeks finds. To him who knocks it will be opened.”

Matthew 7:7-8

“If you don’t ask, you don’t get it.”

Mahatma Gandhi

Racism is not a religion.

As mentioned in the introduction, religions such as Catholicism and the Ismless + ism are good hearted because they are universally accessible, like the Christian nativity, which even toddlers can grasp the very meaning of etc. However, exactly like drugs, racism cannot be a religion because it is not good hearted because it cannot be taught to young children. Teaching children to be racist would be immoral. Racism is something only supposed adults secretly take up in their late teens and early twenties. Therefore, another problem for racists, is that they follow, make, profess or identify as a political or philosophical ism and not a good hearted religion or religious ism. Therefore, this means that when racist people are negatively, viciously and maliciously attacked for their beliefs by anti-racists, either on social media or sometimes physically by extremists such as Antifa, they are never martyrs. I mean I believe that racists suffer abuse mentally, emotionally and physically for their beliefs for absolutely no reason whatsoever, and this is because racism is not a good hearted religion. However, because the Ismless + ism is a good hearted and benign religion, if (God forbid) Ismlessists are ever attacked, either verbally online or physically by extremist anti-racists for their faith and beliefs, they would be martyrs, much like how early Christians were martyred and persecuted by the Romans etc. To reiterate, this is because they have a hypothetical religion or religious ism and it is not a political position or opinion that they have, but a genuine faith and belief. Therefore, consider becoming an Ismlessist instead. The Ismless + ism is the methadone of racism.

The 11 Precepts.

Being a hypothetical, syncretic and fundamental religion, every precept in this list I learned from many different religions, that is, Kabbalah, Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism, Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism and Confucianism. And most importantly you have to know that these precepts are actually what I do, believe and practice myself in my own life.

1. PHILO-SEMITISM.

The first precept of the Ismlessism is the religious belief and conviction of the “chosenness” of the Jewish people, and that via descent from the ancient Israelites, Jewish people are the chosen people, i.e. selected to be in a covenant with God. Just so you know that, although I am not an angel, just as equally important personally to me and my nearly 5 year long endeavour to remove racism, forgive Adolf Hitler and help save white people, was also my law of emphatic philo-Semitism and absolute, eternal and violent pro-semitism. I am like Antifa when it comes to anti-Semitism. The protection and care for Jewish people was simultaneously my goal or belief along side the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and helping to save white people for 5 years. Having these dual goals, beliefs or dual motivations for nearly 5 years, was how the Ismlessism was achieved. I know it’s dumb, taken for granted and imbecilic, but like anti-racism, I don’t like taking things for granted, in that I like to read a book about something to confirm my convictions and beliefs. Therefore, in July 2017 I actually read a book called Judaism: History, Belief and Practice, by Dan Cohn-Sherbok to confirm my pro-Semitism and to check or make sure that there was nothing wrong with Judaism. As soon as I finished the book I knew there was absolutely nothing wrong with Jewish people, and that absolutely nothing deserved the Holocaust. Stupid I know, but that was the turning point. From that moment on I knew I was definitely a devoted and caring pro-Semite. Therefore, obviously I make absolutely no difference whatsoever between Jewish people and European Christians. Therefore, although I was a mild racist I was never anti-Semitic. I consider Jews white people and I love them just as much as Christian white people. Devout philo-Semitism and absolute, eternal and violent pro-semitism is the first law of the Ismlessism.

For you are a holy people to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. Deuteronomy 14:2

2. THE ISMLESSIST.

An Ismlessist has the unshakable conviction and belief that to cut the head off the snake means that we have to make Adolf Hitler the Ismlessist and make sure that he believes in and professes the Ismless + ism, and that therefore, this removes the racism from him, and therefore, that he is forgiven, thereby attaining the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, as well as the forgiveness of smaller-scale sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile, as well as the atonement and salvation of all white people for the Holocaust. An Ismlessist believes in the inseparability of Adolf Hitler to the Ismless + ism and the inseparability of Adolf Hitler to the noun or adjective Ismlessist. They are one and the same thing. There is no other way to get the Ismless + ism to work than to make Adolf Hitler the most important, first and foremost Ismlessist. The rule or law is to refer to Adolf Hitler as the Ismlessist and to refer to everybody else as an Ismlessist. This is how to forgive him.

3. FAITH.

This precept is optional if you are polytheistic, atheist, animist or totemistic etc, however, I believe it is important enough to warrant a precept. Like Judaism and Catholicism, an Ismlessist is masculine and believes in masculinity. This is the age old and tried and tested concept of 100% supremely masculine monotheism. That is, the unquestionable belief in one supremely male or masculine God. An Ismlessist believes that YHWH or Allah is an unquestionably 100% male or masculine deity. Ismlessists believe in YHWH, God, the Father or Allah and that He is a 100% unquestionably masculine deity. An Ismlessist believes that Jesus Christ the Son of God is a 100% unquestionably masculine deity. Ismlessists believe that Earth will always be unquestionably dominated by heterosexual males for eternity. It is our unquestionable Ismlessist faith that YHWH is a supremely masculine God.

Pliocene (Australopithecus africanus) Adolf Hitler, with bone and rock. Caveman, prehistoric man, subhuman, monkey, ape, primate, animal.
Pliocene (Australopithecus africanus) Adolf Hitler, with bone and rock.

4. DESIRE.

White Ismlessists should have absolutely zero desire to attain nirvana. The only desire of a white Ismlessist is to help save white people. Non-white Ismlessists also should have absolutely zero desire to attain nirvana. Non-white Ismlessists should also have absolutely zero desire to destroy, conquer or master Europe or white Ismlessists. We white Ismlessists would be able to tell if non-white Ismlessists harboured any such ulterior motives. The only desire or goal of both white and non-white Ismlessists should be to remove or overcome racism and to help save white people.

5. ALTRUISM.

Ismlessists are the most altruistic people on Earth. This is because they devoutly care about the health, safety, fecundity, protection and wellbeing of their own white people. Ismlessists don’t want to save the world like Jesus Christ, they just passionately want to save their own people. Ismlessists are prepared to make just about any sacrifice for their own people.

6. MOTIVE.

One of the most fundamental and important precepts of the Ismless + ism is motive. One thing about science is that it puts lay people (like me) off from seriously taking up non-career oriented, academic reading and especially writing an independent 87,000 word thesis (on the outside of universities). When you take up reading and write a thesis independently on the outside of universities you work for virtue, to help save white people and not your career goals. When you work not for career goals but for virtue, your motive is different, such as mine was always to help save white people. However, you would not be allowed to have the motive to help save white people at university. I mean you may end up doing something as random as theoretical physics or you may end up doing something like post-impressionist oil painting, but your motive must always be to help save white people. Every twitch of your finger must be to help save white people. That was always my motivation and I mean always, 100% all of the time, all the way through my 5 year long reading and writing endeavour etc. I mean I wouldn’t have read a single letter if my motivation wasn’t for white people. And to be honest I could even go back to 2006/2007 (way before I started reading) as to where my motivations to help save white people came from. Therefore, the motive is most important. If you want to write a thesis and change the world, you must find your pure, devoted, unadulterated and eternal motive. Having the eternal motive to help save white people and no desire to attain nirvana is an unbelievably modest desire. For example, I have read Confucius: And the World He Created by Michael Schuman and it is one of the best and most important books I have ever read. Confucius is so important and to truly understand East Asia you need to understand Confucius. Michael Schuman is an excellent writer, he really conveys the importance of Confucian philosophy to you effectively and efficiently with no messing around. However, while reading this amazing book, it got me thinking that as you know I am currently dreaming of writing my own small book on the Ismless + ism as I believe it is important enough to the well being of my own people and to the whole world etc. In fact, I believe it is my moral duty and responsibility to publish and promulgate the Ismless + ism for the benefit of all Europeans and European societies. What I was thinking about when I read Confucius: And the World He Created by Michael Schuman is why does or did Michael Schuman write such an amazing book? I mean what were his motivations? Did he want to improve the world or did he do it for money or a combination of both? It got me thinking about my own motivations and how unbelievably pure, noble and altruistic they are. This is because I am not in any way motivated by money. In fact, the Ismless + ism actually costs me money. I believe it is a case of your starting point or starting position. I mean what were your initial goals or motivations when you began your endeavour or started your small business? We’re you just out to make a quick buck and rip people off or did you have absolutely pure, good, noble and altruistic motives or intentions for the benefit of the mankind and the whole world? Therefore, I know that even if I do make a little money from the Ismless + ism book, that my motives and my starting point are both absolutely sound. If I was to write a small book about the Ismless + ism, my goals or objectives would be the following in order of importance:

  1. To help save or protect my own people (Europeans).
  2. To make a name for myself, leave my mark on the world or go down in history.
  3. As I am disabled and on benefits, to earn an income in order to make my self independent and more confident.

“There is no point in seeking the views of a gentleman who, though he sets his heart on the Way, is ashamed of poor food and poor clothes,” the sage said. That suspicion stemmed from his belief that the profit motive ran counter to morality. By seeking riches, man was drawn away from virtue. “The gentleman understands what is moral,” Confucius said. “The small man understands what is profitable.” This isn’t to say that Confucius was against financial success entirely. He implied that amassing great wealth is fine—as long as one attains it while engaged in strictly virtuous behavior. “Wealth and high station are what men desire but unless I got them in the right way I would not remain in them,” he said. “Poverty and low station are what men dislike, but even if I did not get them in the right way, I would not try to escape from them.” In Confucian thought, wealth would come to those who were virtuous and wise. A good king could bring prosperity to himself and his entire kingdom if he followed the Way. “Virtue is the root; wealth is the result,” The Great Learning asserts.

Confucius: And the World He Created by Michael Schuman, location 3790.

“Riches and honors acquired by unrighteousness, are to me as a floating cloud.”

The Complete Confucius: The Analects, The Doctrine Of The Mean and The Great Learning, Confucius, page 26.

However, I just wanted to state another thing which I think is important. As you know I have stated and encouraged lay people (like me) to take up serious, non-career oriented, academic reading, research and writing etc about anything at all that they passionately believe in, in some kind of unorthodox or unofficial free thinking university; that is not limited by taboos and political correctness etc. And I have also just stated that motive is paramount, in that you must find your pure, devoted, unadulterated and eternal motive, like mine was always to help save white people. However, I am coming to the conclusion that there is something particularly right about my motive or motives. I mean I am worried that you go barking up the wrong tree for 5 years, however, although barking up the tree is exactly what I did for 5 years and my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler was barking up the wrong tree, however, it was not entirely and not ultimately barking up the wrong tree as it led to the Ismless + ism. This proves that you can never tell if someone is entirely barking up the wrong tree? They may have it wrong today but their good heart might be in the right place, their motives and their starting position may be sound. Therefore, I just wanted to forewarn you that there appears to be something particularly right or correct about the motives of ultimate forgiveness and helping to save white people. I will bullet point my motive(s) to make it clearer:

  • Forgiveness.
  • Helping to save white people.
  • The absolution of Adolf Hitler.
  • Overcome racism.
  • Etc.

There just seems to be something particularly right about the above motive(s) as they definitely work. I am just worried that you choose a motive that is a dud or dead in the water? However, remember I initially wanted to prove racism right only to find out that the perfect answer (and what I truly wanted) was actually more anti-racist, namely, the Ismless + ism, which does help save white people and is the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler etc. Therefore, think very carefully about your motive, copy mine if you like. The more people who find ways to forgive and help save white people the better.

7. DISABILITY.

I have mentioned it before, however I just wanted to mention it again, that the Ismless + ism does not believe in talent, intelligence or being ‘blessed’ with attractive physical endowment, in that the Ismlessism prefers angelic simpletons (such as St. André Bessette, who was illiterate) over evil articulate geniuses such as Nietzsche. The ismlessism or thee ism, being a religious ism, is as simple and relevant to 3 year olds as it is to all other age groups just like the Christian nativity. Therefore, in the same vein and in relation to my 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, I am not the brightest of people, I am a fool, I basically flunked my GCSEs, I only got a merit (as opposed to a distinction) BTEC National Diploma and a 2:1 Bachelor of Arts degree. I was a 1990s trance clubber and I absolutely caned it in the 1990s on ecstacy. Mitzis (Mitsubishi) were my favourite pill. I mean it I really caned it, I took like 13 pills in one night at Gatecrasher several times. In fact, I used to double drop Es. Therefore, as a kid I was really thick and not very articulate or studious at all. In fact, I was thick all of my life until the 1st August 2016, when I started reading. I have always been a sub-average achiever and never a straight-A student. But then again nothing has ever really interested me. Being a late developer I only grew up at age 35 when I started reading and to pursue my quest to fix racism, forgive Adolf Hitler and help save white people, and it was only helping to save white people that really interested me and the only thing that I truly and passionately cared about. Nothing interested me at school, college and university. At school I was one of those kids you would find ducking class and smoking in the toilets etc. However, I truly and passionately care about white people. Like some of the Catholic Saints who were losers, illiterate and even Satan worshippers, another fundamental law (along with poverty) of the Ismlessism is that there are no limits to how late you are in achieving something in life or how much of a loser you are. For example, to be a doctor you have to be very determined at like 9 years old and you have to be very studious, ahead of the rest and be very early etc. However, the Ismless + ism doesn’t care too much about that. For example, as of 2021 I am 40 years old and I never did anything educational and I had never read a book in my life until the 1st of August 2016, when I was 35 years old. Also I am 40 years old and I am kind of in care for my schizophrenia, however, the secret is, that I would never have been able to attain the Ismlessism, through 5 years of intensive reading, various online endeavours to solve racism and through writing an 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler without the extremely kind care and support of the mental health team (NHS) and disability benefits (since 2012). I just wouldn’t have been able to do it. I had the time to do it, whereas normal people who work did not. Therefore, with the Ismlessism it doesn’t matter if you are a poor 60 year old who has never read a book in his or her life, the Ismlessism has absolutely no deadlines or cutoff points in life in which to achieve something. The Ismless + ism is a double ism, it is thee ism, it is a religious ism, like the nativity it is as relevant to 4 year olds as it is to centenarians, I mean it is thick and simple enough for infants understand. Therefore, what I am trying to say is that I am not intelligent, I am a fool and that my 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler is probably really thick, dumb, unprofessional and un-academic etc. However, I don’t think that intelligence is what really matters with religion or religious isms, especially Catholicism. Even though it was wrong, I believe my good heart was in the right place and that my motives were right when I wrote my 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and I asked a question that nobody else has ever asked before, namely is there any way we can forgive Adolf Hitler? For example, I don’t think intelligence is really what matters with God or religion because honestly intelligence would probably never ask the dumb question is there a way to forgive Adolf Hitler? Only a fool like me would be dumb enough to ask such a question. I mean my prayers were literally answered when I attained the one word perfect answer to racism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, namely the Ismlessism. Again what I am trying to say is that intelligence doesn’t matter with religion, because you can be an evil genius and an angelic simpleton, and that’s what religion, God or Jesus Christ likes, that is, a good simple heart over an evil big brain. For example, St. André Bessette was illiterate, he was uneducated but a Saint. Therefore, intelligence and being advanced will never save us, but a good natured simple (or thick) heart that asks the right question will. Therefore, an Ismlessist believes in the philosophy that religion (as opposed to science and academia, which always seek talent), God and Jesus Christ etc like and prefer disabled saintly simpletons to talented evil geniuses. That is that religion or God prefers primitive Saints (such as St. André Bessette whom was illiterate) to advanced and articulate geniuses such as Nietzsche. This is the Ismlessism and how it was attained. I believe “Every Sperm Is Sacred”, the famous musical sketch from the film Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life, sung by Michael Palin, pretty well sums up Catholicism and exactly what I am trying to say about simple good hearts versus evil genius. Here’s some lyrics:

There are Jews in the world

There are Buddhists

There are Hindus and Mormons, and then

There are those that follow Mohammed, but

I’ve never been one of them

I’m a Roman Catholic,

And have been since before I was born,

And the one thing they say about Catholics is:

They’ll take you as soon as you’re warm

You don’t have to be a six-footer

You don’t have to have a great brain

You don’t have to have any clothes on You’re

A Catholic the moment Dad came,

Because…

Every sperm is sacred

Every sperm is great

If a sperm is wasted,

God gets quite irate!

I am not insulting professors or academics intelligence because I think I have done a similar kind of thing to a PhD, in that I have spent five years reading intensively and over a year and a half I wrote an 87,000 word thesis. Even though my first thesis was incorrect it led to the Ismless + ism, which is correct. What I mean by not insulting professors and academics intelligence, is that they are infinitely more intelligent than I and more than intelligent enough to workout and discover the Ismless + ism, the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and the solution to racism and the Holocaust etc, however, their unbelievable intelligence is far too extremely and tyrannically limited by taboos and political correctness.

Miocene Adolf Hitler, brown headed spider monkey. Caveman, prehistoric man, subhuman, monkey, ape, primate, animal.
Miocene Adolf Hitler, brown headed spider monkey.

8. NONVIOLENCE.

Pioneers. – I greet all the signs indicating that a more manly and warlike age is commencing, which will, above all, bring heroism again into honor! For it has to prepare the way for a yet higher age, and gather the force which the latter will one day require, – the age which will carry heroism into knowledge, and wage war for the sake of ideas and their consequences.

Heroism. This is the ethos of a people which strives toward a goal against the form it no longer fits. Heroism is the good will toward self-destruction.

What makes heroic? – To face simultaneously one’s greatest suffering and one’s highest hope.

But by my love and hope I conjure thee: cast not away the hero in thy soul! Maintain holy thy highest hope!

One has renounced grand life, when one has renounced war.

Brethren, war’s the origin
Of happiness on earth!

Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 19051922.

I am developing the Ismlessism by or from my own example of how I have behaved, my actions and convictions etc since the 1st of August 2016, when I started reading. Reading is the truth and I read over 150 books from cover to cover in my endeavour to help save white people. Therefore, I am trying to be as truthful as I can be as to how I discovered the religion of the Ismlessism since the 1st August 2016. As you know I am a schizophrenic, therefore, before the Ismlessism you really don’t need to know anything about my life, in fact other than my reading and writing, the less said about before the Ismlessism the better. Whatever happened before the Ismlessism, stays before the Ismlessism! Let nothing more be said about it! So as you know the Ismlessism came from the ism, namely (mild) racism, and going from my own example I think that racism is a warrior. I mean that basically the mentality of a racist is about protecting our women and countries and about being a hero like Achilles, it’s basically kind of a warrior mentality. I don’t mean physically as in hand-to-hand combat or war or anything like that, but more like being a slightly aggressive, brave or heroic spiritual or mental warrior, like Achilles. Like the above Nietzsche quote, racists are warriors who believe in heroism, chivalry, virtue, honour and glory etc. Racists fundamentally believe that discrimination is key and nonnegotiable, in that at some point there has to be and must be a little impoliteness toward non-white people in order to protect our borders and women etc. For example, declining non-white people U.K. citizenship, immigrant status and deportations etc. Racists fundamentally believe that no matter what, there must be minimal discrimination between black and white in order to save our countries and women etc. Yes! That was exactly me until I discovered the Ismlessism and until I understood how Asians genuinely have no schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust and that they genuinely want us to fix or remove the ism, namely racism before anything else. It was only in the light of the epiphany of the Ismlessism, which is a good hearted religion or religious ism, which made me see my slight aggressiveness and how I was a bit of a wannabe mental warrior. However, the Ismlessism transformed me into an unbelievably or extremely religious, good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent person etc like Mahatma Gandhi. I mean ancient and medieval people were all about warriors, heros, chivalry, glory and bravery etc, as demonstrated by such as Homer’s Iliad and Achilles etc. However, I believe that since the world wars (and the Holocaust) that we Europeans and indeed everyone have actually left the Age of Warriors behind and as demonstrated by such as Mahatma Gandhi, I believe we have entered a brand new, peaceful, nonviolent, good hearted and non-warrior Age of Religions? I mean if the Japanese after World War Two could give up the Bushidō samurai code, which was an extreme, kamikaze, victory or suicide, and to-the-death warrior code, then surely European racists can convert to a peaceful, nonviolent and good hearted religious ism, namely the Ismlessism? Therefore, I would just like to point out to both potential right and left wing converts, that the Ismlessism is a good hearted religion like Buddhism or Jainism, and a peaceful one at that, and although it has symbols and art, it does not aggressively protest or demonstrate politically or militantly with flags and banners etc. I mean for example, if you were going to march or demonstrate it should be done peacefully and with no shouting or chanting etc. This kind of non-optional quiet and peaceful demonstration should really highlight how much trouble white people are in for the World Wars. We can’t do really anything else! The Ismlessism is a good hearted and peaceful religion. Peace, reading, praying and meditation are more like it’s demands. Beat BLM and Antifa at their own game by not being aggressive, violent or intimidating, be peaceful, religious, prayerful, good hearted and meditative etc. Mahatma Gandhi employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India’s independence from British rule and in turn inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. Obviously because of the two World Wars, Mahatma Gandhi used religion to teach white people a thing or two about good heartedness and nonviolence. However, if white people want to save their countries they should mimic the Asians and their religious isms, be religious instead of political and learn from Asians and copy their religious leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi. White people can only copy the Asians such as Mahatma Gandhi and his religious and nonviolent resistance with an ism, such as the Ismlessism. I mean British people have always been a bit aggressive, but the two World Wars really took the biscuit. However, still white people have not learned a thing from Asians, Mahatma Gandhi and his message of nonviolence because Antifa are a violent, aggressive, intimidating extreme-leftist political movement. So first of all Adolf Hitler produced a Holocaust, and then white people go and produce Antifa. Finally, today be good hearted and religious not a warrior like Nietzsche.

Though you might conquer in battle A thousand times a thousand men, You’re the greatest battle-winner If you conquer just one – yourself.

The Buddha (Dhammapada verse 103).

9. POVERTY.

Another important precept or virtue of the Ismlessism is poverty. Since 2012 I have been on disability benefits because of my schizophrenia, which amounts to around £850 month. I am 40 and I have never really worked in my life due to mental illness, except 8 months at GAME in 2004 as a sales assistant and 8 months at T-Mobile as a sales assistant in 2009, both on about a grand a month. Therefore, unless this Ismlessism book sells like hot cakes, I am, always have been and probably always will be relatively poor? I promise you that even if this Ismlessism book is successful, I will always try to live by example and if I do make any money from the Ismless + ism, I will live by example, be very charitable and use the money wisely. Therefore, the Ismless + ism is strict about poverty. In theory the most highest ranking, most venerated, respected and loved Ismlessist, would always also be the poorest among us. If you are a sales assistant on a grand a month, you are the highest ranking Ismlessist and you should know that. If you are homeless, you are absolutely the highest ranking Ismlessist. I am not saying that you can’t be an affluent Ismlessist or that you should give your money away, only that you should know that we Ismlessists don’t give a damn about money or wealth, that it doesn’t make you a higher ranking or more respected Ismlessist by having money, in fact that you should understand that the highest ranking Ismlessist is the poorest and also that you should know that you should be very charitable with your wealth etc. Therefore, an Ismlessist believes in the ancient, universal and fundamental morality of compassionate charity, benevolence, asceticism and poverty, which all religions of the world teach, including Judaism, Buddhism and Christianity. There are many scriptural examples, however, Matthew 6:3-4 and Luke 16:19-31 are good ones. Therefore, an Ismlessist believes that there is reward in charity and that God and heaven reward those who are generous, benevolent or charitable. Siddhartha Gautama was a prince who renounced his royal entitlement, became an ascetic and nearly starved himself to death before he attained nirvana. Pharaohs were rich men who thought they were a god, however, ultimately God was Jesus Christ who was born in a manger. I have read the Bible three times and I understand it well, you just get better with it over time. The main lesson, concept, truth or meaning of both the Old Testament and the New Testament is that Jesus Christ (and the Buddha) are an inverse Pharaoh or an inverse god king. It’s the lesson of life or the universe, it’s the lesson from all of prehistory and antiquity. Basically, before Jesus Christ, ancient Pharaohs, kings and emperors tended to self-deify or be deified, for example Menhutep II blatantly self-deified, Julius Caesar was deified and Augustus (Octavian) also straddled the borders of divinity. This is how humanity came in the first place, before Jesus Christ, that is, they made the richest and most powerful deities. Obviously after Jesus Christ, the true God and King of the universe, who was born in a humble manger and who came to serve and not be served etc, subtly and all of a sudden nobody wants to be Menhutep II, and kings and emperors subtly no longer wish to be deified. The only reason European medieval Christian monarchs didn’t self-deify is probably because of Jesus Christ. And remember this eternal lesson is the reason Jesus Christ died! Jesus Christ died to teach god kings, divine emperors and all of mankind this eternal lesson. Siddhartha Gautama also did precisely the same thing with His Great Renunciation. Basically Siddhartha Gautama renounced his royal titles, luxuries and wives etc and became an extreme ascetic who nearly starved himself to death! It’s exactly the same lesson, that is, from royalty to poverty and nirvana. Therefore, humanity has been taught the same eternal lesson about riches and wealth twice! I mean take this eternal lesson from the Bible metaphorically, allegorically or kabbalistically not literally, by this I mean that the ‘Pharaoh’ stands for or represents anyone who is rich and famous today, who just wants to attain nirvana. It’s a lesson that no one ever seems to learn properly. Therefore, the lesson, which still applies today, is basically that there are two options in life, firstly, you can be a metaphorical ‘Pharaoh’ in life, that is rich, famous, vain and go down in history, or you can be like Jesus Christ and the Buddha, that is, poor, ascetic, modest, who attains nirvana and goes down for eternity. Don’t care about money.

“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 5:3

But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. Matthew 6:3-4

Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” Matthew 19:23-24

“Give, even if you only have a little.” Dhammapada verse 224.

10. HUMILITY.

An absolute law or philosophy of the Ismless + ism is complete humbleness. The New Testament verse below sums up another primary or fundamental precept of the Ismless + ism.

For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

Matthew 23:12

11. FORGIVENESS.

Why is Adolf Hitler the Ismlessist? He is the most important Ismlessist because his forgiveness is world peace and has the most benefit for all Europeans. Now as mentioned, the Ismlessism is a universal and anti-racist religion or religious ism and it is about strict or sensible nonviolence, not extreme or vegetarian nonviolence like the Jainists but very strict. Now nonviolence definitely does not mean just war or battle but it also means no violent political demonstrations by such as the Antifascists. We Ismlessists have the true forgiveness, guaranteed peace, nonviolence and anti-racism of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, it is now you Antifascists who are the violent and aggressive wrongdoers! Therefore, my more than a year long and ultimately incorrect endeavour to forgive Adolf Hitler with time and relativity (that is, my 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler also called Time For Forgiveness) proved that even though I was wrong, that heaven does love a trier and does answer those who humbly and sincerely ask. Time For Forgiveness truly, deeply and sincerely asked the question can we solve the Holocaust and racism? Is there any way we can forgive Adolf Hitler? Is there any way we can help save white people? Time For Forgiveness tried to forgive absolutely everything (including Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile), all in order to forgive Adolf Hitler in order to help save white people, therefore, Adolf Hitler was always my main goal, because there is obviously a huge benefit for white people in the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. What benefit there is in forgiving Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile I do not as yet know, and how Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile are forgiven in the afterlife I do not as yet know, however, I can tell you that I do know how Adolf Hitler is forgiven in the afterlife, that is, I know Adolf Hitler is the Ismlessist and he believes in the Ismlessism. Therefore, what if Adolf Hitler is the Ismlessist? What if Adolf Hitler professed or believed in the Ismlessism? Would you forgive him then? The Ismlessism removes the racism from Adolf Hitler. As long as he is the Ismlessist, he is okay and forgiven? That’s the power of the Ismlessism, it even fixes and makes us forgive Adolf Hitler down here in life or on Earth, without having to wait for the afterlife. Therefore, if Adolf Hitler is alright and forgiven, then who on Earth isn’t? Surely Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile would also be forgiven? That’s the beauty of absolute and universal forgiveness, that is, you just need to cut the head off the snake or forgive the most severe example (Adolf Hitler) and all other lesser sins are automatically forgiven by default. Therefore, to reiterate, to cut the head off the snake means that the racism is removed from Adolf Hitler as long as we make him the Ismlessist and make sure that he professes or believes in the Ismlessism, which leads to his absolution and the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their countless and individual acts of terror during World War Two. To cut the head off the snake also means that all white people are forgiven for the Holocaust. Finally, because the Ismlessism cuts the head off the snake, that is, the Ismless + ism forgives Adolf Hitler, therefore, an Ismlessist believes that no one is unforgivable, even Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc. To reiterate an Ismlessist believes in extreme, ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness.

And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us. Matthew 6:12

The Beliefs.

Although the 11 precepts of the Ismless + ism are sacred, the following is just a rough, similar and general list of primary beliefs of an Ismlessist. Please note that being a hypothetical, syncretic and fundamental religion, most beliefs in this list I learned from many different religions, that is, Kabbalah, Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism, Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism and Confucianism etc. Therefore, there is some overlap or repetition between the 11 precepts and the beliefs of the Ismless + ism. And most importantly you have to know that these beliefs are actually what I do, believe and practice myself in my own life.

  1. The first belief of an Ismlessist is the religious conviction of the “chosenness” of the Jewish people, and that via descent from the ancient Israelites, Jewish people are the chosen people, i.e. selected to be in a covenant with God.
  2. This belief is optional if you are polytheistic, atheist, animist or totemistic etc, however, I believe it is important enough to warrant a belief. An Ismlessist is masculine and believes in masculinity. This is from or through the age old and tried and tested concept of 100% masculine monotheism. That is, the unquestionable belief in one supremely male God. An Ismlessist believes that YHWH or Allah is an unquestionably 100% male or masculine deity. An Ismlessist believes that Jesus Christ is an unquestionably 100% male or masculine God. It is our unquestionable Ismlessist faith that YHWH is a supremely masculine God.
  3. An imperative and fundamental belief of an Ismlessist is Matthew 23:12: ‘For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.’
  4. An Ismlessist believes in the full admission and acknowledgment that without the Ismless + ism, white people would be doomed as a result of the Holocaust.
  5. An Ismlessist believes that the Holocaust is unspeakable, however, an Ismlessist also believes that the unspeakable Holocaust has probably been overcome with the Ismless + ism?
  6. An Ismlessist believes that white people are ismless because of the Holocaust.
  7. An Ismlessist believes that all groups of people must have an ism in one form or another of their own.
  8. An Ismlessist believes that the Ismless + ism is a double ism, it is thee ism, it is a brand new religious ism and it is the answer or solution to the other ism, namely racism.
  9. An Ismlessist believes that the Ismless + ism is probably a hypothetical, universal, syncretic, anti-racist and fundamental religion or religious ism.
  10. An Ismlessist believes that the Ismless + ism is the eternal and unquestionable answer or solution to the ism, namely racism, the Holocaust and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler.
  11. An Ismlessist believes that the discoverer of the Ismless + ism, Graham Cammock (me), attained the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler after having spent nearly 5 years reading over 130 books and that I the said Graham Cammock (the fool) wrote an 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler, which simplified down to one perfect one word equation, formula or answer, namely, the Ismless + ism.
  12. An Ismlessist believes that the universe always has a fundamental answer or solution to any problem or sin for those earnestly and humbly ask, even for the Holocaust etc.
  13. An Ismlessist believes that the Ismless + ism determines that nothing is unfixable. Even the Holocaust.
  14. An Ismlessist believes that the Ismless + ism cuts the head off the snake, removes the racism from Adolf Hitler, and that as long as Adolf Hitler is the Ismlessist and believes in and professes the Ismless + ism, that he is forgiven, thereby attaining the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two as well as the atonement and salvation of all white people for the Holocaust.
  15. An Ismlessist believes that through the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, the Ismless + ism removes all the racial hatred and anger from world.
  16. An Ismlessist believes in eternal peace and nonviolence.
  17. An Ismlessist believes in the non-use of hate or aggression, especially politically or on social media etc.
  18. An Ismlessist believes in the ancient, universal and fundamental morality of compassionate charity, benevolence, asceticism and poverty, which all religions of the world teach, including Judaism, Buddhism and Christianity. There are many scriptural examples, however, Matthew 6:3-4 and Luke 16:19-31 are good ones. Therefore, an Ismlessist believes that there is reward in charity and that God and heaven reward those who are generous, benevolent or charitable. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. Matthew 6:3-4
  19. An Ismlessist believes in the philosophy that religion (as opposed to science and academia, which always seek talent), God and Jesus Christ etc like and prefer disabled saintly simpletons to talented evil geniuses. That is that religion or God prefers primitive Saints (such as St. André Bessette whom was illiterate) to advanced and articulate geniuses such as Nietzsche. This is the Ismless + ism and how it was attained.
  20. An Ismlessist believes in reading, writing and prayer, as these activities were how the Ismlessism was attained.

Fundamental religion.

I have read many books about other religions my goal of which was to see if I can pick anything up from them. I have read Taoism for Dummies and what I am starting to understand generally is that a lot of religions (especially eastern religions) are quite mystical and inaccurate compared to western science. For example, Taoism has its beliefs in the Tao (the Way), yin-yang theory, ch’i, the five elements (wood, fire, earth, metal and water) and traditional Chinese medicine etc. All of the above theories are interrelated, for example ch’i tells acupuncturists which body parts to puncture etc. Obviously this is similar to pre-modern western medicine with its humorism or the humoral theory, which began to fall out of favor in the 1850s. It was the west that brought the world out of such ancient and medieval knowledge and invented the scientific method and modern medicine etc. However, I am not showing off, because it was the west that had two world wars and a Holocaust (with all that precise science). Perhaps Europeans could have used their own peaceful, good hearted and nonviolent religious ism? Also, science is rational, neutral and amoral and will therefore, never forgive us for our sins, the Holocaust and Adolf Hitler etc. And finally, as mentioned, advanced science puts lay people like me off of independent reading, writing and philosophising etc. I mean obviously the five Chinese elements are imprecise or mystical while the periodic table of western chemistry is fundamental and precise, but on which side of the mystical/fundamental fence does the Ismless + ism fall? The Ismless + ism is a fundamental religion, the universe made it the perfect fundamental solution to racism, that is, its mathematical purpose is to fix, overcome and remove the other most powerful ism in the universe, namely, racism. Therefore, the Ismless + ism is fact, it is a 100% fundamental religion. However, it is just one word. Taoism has over 1500 texts as well as the above mentioned mystical theories and doctrines etc. Therefore, mystical religions such as Taoism and the Kabbalah (which has the mystical Tree of Life and the Zohar etc) have a lot of theory, writings, scriptures and stuff associated with them, yet they are mystical and imprecise, while on the other hand the Ismless + ism is just one fundamental word. (Note: all the precepts and beliefs in this essay are simply what I learned from other religions). I mean I am not an ancient person, I am a modern person trying to help save my own people, however, most religions were begun in the axial age before Christ, therefore, obviously I cannot create any mystical and imprecise doctrine such as the Tree of Life with its 10 mystical dimensions etc. (I’m not that crazy!) I have to stay fundamental and science fact. But the consequence is that the Ismless + ism has nothing to it, it is just one very fundamental word. What I do know is that there is nothing more or higher than the Ismless + ism for racism. I mean was the Ismless + ism designed? No, it was always there. It’s an absolute truth and absolute truths are never created, only discovered. I mean obviously I want the Ismless + ism to be a religion because that’s kind of cool, but it may not have to be? It’s just a matter of whatever works best? The Ismless + ism could be a philosophical or political ism etc? So what makes the Ismless + ism a religion? Well as mentioned it’s sober, good hearted, universal and accessible to all age groups. Also it’s all about forgiveness, saving and salvation etc. However, also I just prefer religion, I am more comfortable with religion, as opposed to NGOs and political parties etc.

External and altruistic salvation.

As you know in 2021 I unofficially converted to Catholicism from the Church of England. I definitely prefer Catholicism because, firstly I wholeheartedly believe in the communion of Saints, in fact the turning point that led me to Catholicism and praying the Rosary and then subsequently to the epiphany of realising the Ismlessism was a book called Life In A Medieval Monastery: The Monks Of Durham Cathedral by Anne Boyd. In this book I learned about Saint Cuthbert of Lindisfarne. I was totally astonished at my own complete ignorance of the holy, sacred and miraculous origins of my own local cathedral and in fact the City of Durham itself. Durham Cathedral, castle and indeed the City of Durham was founded in 995 AD, on the final resting place of Saint Cuthbert’s relics by monks fleeing the Viking raids on Lindisfarne. Therefore, Durham wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for Saint Cuthbert. I came to truly believe in Saint Cuthbert. I came to believe that Saints are magic. Also, I prefer Catholicism because of the Rosary, which to me is wonderful. It was actually during a Rosary prayer that I realised that white people are ismless. Therefore, I wanted to discuss one thing, which is that there are two types of salvation. There is internal, personal or egoistic salvation and there is external, general and altruistic salvation. Therefore, I just wanted to point out that if a white Protestant converts to Catholicism, it achieves practically nothing. It’s just a statistic for the Vatican. However, if a white person converts to the Ismless + ism it achieves a lot, it helps save all white people. Therefore, instead of being saved in the internal or personal usual Christian way, why not help save all white people in an external or altruistic way yourself, by the act of converting to the Ismless + ism? With Christianity most people seek their own personal salvation, it’s as if Jesus Christ saves you and you alone. No body within Christianity (apart from Jesus Christ) dares to try and save the whole world or tries to help save white people (which is my whole world). So instead of saving just one person, that is yourself, why not help save all white people altruistically by converting to the Ismless + ism? You can do it, we can all help save all white people individually by ourselves by converting to the Ismless + ism.

Conversion.

I am the discoverer of the Ismless + ism and it’s probably obvious to you by now, especially as evidenced by some of my earlier digressions, that I was or used to be a mild racist and that the Ismless + ism came entirely from the ism, namely racism, or from a near 5 year effort to overcome or prove racism correct. I always admired and respected the Asians and I was absolutely never anti-Semitic, however, I didn’t want to share our women, governments and genes with everything else. The first thing the Ismlessism did was make me admire and respect even more those people who have always had ancient religious isms of their own, namely the Asians. As an Ismlessist, I am very attracted to Asians because Asians have their own religious isms and having a preference or bias for people with religious isms is not intolerance or racism. It’s true that I initially wanted the Ismlessism to be a white only religion, and this is because the Ismlessism is undeniably the culmination of a near 5 year endeavour to help save and protect white people. However, I just couldn’t do it to the Asians, I mean just couldn’t deny them the opportunity of becoming fellow Ismlessists. The Ismlessism is probably a religious ism, not a philosophical or political ism and it does suit an Asian religious symbol and Asian art etc. Therefore, I believe that Asians are probably attracted to the Ismless + ism because:

  1. The Ismlessism solves the ism, namely racism and removes and neutralises the racial hatred and anger from the world.
  2. By making Adolf Hitler the Ismlessist, the Ismlessism removes racism from Adolf Hitler, thereby forgiving him and thereby helping to save and protect white people.

Therefore, to reiterate, because the Ismless + ism solves the ism, namely racism, the Ismlessism is probably very appealing to Asians, therefore I just could not bring myself to deny the Asians the possibility of becoming Ismlessists. Therefore, Asians made me happy to make the Ismlessism a multiethnic religion or religious ism. Also I am myself very interested in and attracted to Asian religious isms, such as Buddhism, Jainism, Confucianism and Taoism etc, and would be sad if I couldn’t try them out or share with them. Also, I have come to believe that helping to save and protect white people does not entail separation or segregation but more making non-white people genuinely, admire, love and respect white people. Therefore, I do want to share our religious ism, women and genes with the Asians because they have their own religious isms. Therefore, I am no longer a mild racist. I am an Ismlessist. Ismlessists are neither racist nor anti-racist, they are in between and they possess all the humour. I believe all human beings, either as groups or as individuals should always have religious isms of their own. Is Adolf Hitler the first convert to the Ismlessism? I think Adolf Hitler is definitely the most important convert to the Ismless + ism because it symbolises world peace also there is so much benefit for all white people through his conversion and forgiveness, therefore, I believe Adolf Hitler should be known as the first convert. Hence, like my own conversion experience, I believe the purpose of the Ismless + ism would be to convert both racists and anti-racists.

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Hominin evolution with Adolf Hitler.

The real religion and how I discovered how to forgive Adolf Hitler.

Although I also believe in and profess the Ismless + ism and my goal in life is to correct the ism, namely racism, please read the following to understand my real faith. I was a child of the 1980s and 1990s and I was reared in a ‘normal’ Protestant family on nothing but pop culture. I was ‘pop cultured’. Thinking I was an angelic child, I turned out to be a vain, show-off and drug using teenager. The rest you don’t want to know about, however, I am now a very repentant 40 year old. You don’t have to be a genius to be a Saint, that’s the beauty of religion (or a religious ism) such as Catholicism, because religion is thick. Religion can be understood by all age levels, for example, it is really good to pray the Rosary together as a family around newborns, infants and children as even children can understand the story of Jesus Christ and the gospel etc. For example, St. André Bessette (9 August 1845 – 6 January 1937), the first Canadian living after Confederation to be canonized, was illiterate. Some Saints were “losers” and Bartolo Longo, who was beatified was formerly a “Satan worshiper.” That’s the beauty of religion, especially Catholicism because you don’t need to be a genius, special or physically well endowed to be a good person. This determines that you can be an advanced genius yet be evil (like Nietzsche). That’s the difference between religion and philosophy, religion is an unbelievably simple (or thick) ism like the Ismlessism, which even a child can understand, while philosophy is an unbelievably advanced (or genius) ism like meta-ethical relativism, which only university students can understand. The thing I like about Saints is that they only seek posthumous adoration, unlike physically well endowed, flashy, drug addict and show off rock and pop stars. Saints are infinitely better examples for us and our children than pop stars.

At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.”

Matthew 11:25

I truly believe in the power and magic of the Catholic Saints, and I believe that the Ismless + ism religion was only given to me by or because I encountered, read about and studied many Catholic Saints. To me, the secret of miracles is that I don’t care. I don’t care if they are superstitious, they are economic. For example, many miracles were attributed to Saint Cuthbert of Lindisfarne, whose final resting place was the foundation of Durham City and Durham Cathedral. Many miracles were attributed to his relics and shrine at Durham Cathedral. The fame of the miracles of Saint Cuthbert’s remains, such as his incorruptible body spread far and wide, and they attracted many pilgrims including kings, seeking a miracle or a cure for infirmity to Durham City, along with which came lucrative devotional offerings, money and grants of lands etc. Therefore, what on Earth does it matter if miracles are superstitious? Saints and miracles build cities and even countries. The history of Durham Cathedral and Saint Cuthbert made me question my Protestant faith. After reading Life In A Medieval Monastery: The Monks Of Durham Cathedral by Anne Boyd, I then read Bede’s Life of St Cuthbert by the Venerable Bede, Building St Cuthbert’s Shrine: Durham Cathedral and the Life of Prior Turgot by Lionel Green, In Search Of The Northern Saints by Simon Webb, a book called Inspiration from the Saints by Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh, and The Rosary Handbook by Mitch Finley, all of which I absolutely loved. You would not believe how pious, devoted, austere, strict and holy the Saints were, they are such an inspiration. Along with many others, these books have made me fall deeply in love with the Catholic Saints and the Catholic faith. Starting with St. Cuthbert and then reading all of these books turned me into a genuine Catholic convert, certainly a believer and practitioner. The Rosary itself is profound, powerful and deep, and instantly you realise that Protestantism does not offer you anything like the sort. Unlike Catholicism with its incense smoke and the Rosary, Protestantism has no substance, stuff or material. Therefore, you cannot be truly religious with Protestantism. Jesus Christ is like the Sun, He is too brilliant and perhaps we should not look at Him directly? That is what I like about Catholicism and its Communion of Saints. Catholicism gives you thousands of Saints to focus on and look at instead of Jesus Christ. While Protestantism gives you nothing to focus on except Jesus Christ. To be honest I had never truly prayed in my life until I read The Rosary Handbook by Mitch Finley. With the Rosary, praying is so genuine and natural. Therefore, due to St. Cuthbert and the above mentioned books I am convinced Catholicism is the true and only western Christian religion. In the long term, I have read almost every day since August 2016 totalling over 150 books (as of July 2021) entirely honed and focused on the singular purpose of fixing racism and helping to save white people. I have tried several methods or ideologies to solve racism on social media over the years. I spent a year writing an 87,000 word, anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler also called Time For Forgiveness. All of which failed. I then gave up on my quest to fix racism. I unofficially converted to Catholicism and began to pray the Rosary every day, and then miraculously my prayers were answered when during my prayers I had the epiphany which realised the Ismlessism. Therefore, as mentioned, I believe that by reading about and venerating the Catholic Saints, unofficially converting to Catholicism and by praying the Rosary every day, that the Ismless + ism was given to me by the Catholic Saints? The Saints are the true faith, they make us more modest and humble. Jesus Christ is like the Sun, and perhaps we should not look directly at Him. If we venerate Mary and the Saints, then how glorious is Jesus Christ? I highly recommend Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh’s book to anyone, he writes with such passion, wit and intelligence and he really teaches you the concept of sainthood, in that a lot of Saints weren’t especially geniuses, talented or physically well endowed etc, some were even “losers”, basically Maolsheachlann Ó Ceallaigh really teaches you that you can be a disabled saintly simpleton or an evil genius. Also Mitch Finley’s book is a great way to learn the Rosary. I also highly recommend to anyone looking for a deeper, more religious and truer faith, or someone questioning their Protestant faith to get familiar with the Saints, buy a rosary, read The Rosary Handbook by Mitch Finley and get a rosary app on your smart phone or tablet. Therefore, the Saints are now my pop idols. Never mind Jesus Christ, it is the Saints who compete with pop stars and pop idols for your adoration. They are infinitely better examples for us and especially our children than drug addict rock and pop stars. My advice to today’s youth would be to venerate, adore, worship and love the Saints not pop idols. I mean as I mentioned in the introduction, religion is good hearted because it is accessible to children, as even toddlers can comprehend the very meaning of the Christian nativity, which is down to Earth, unlike evil 19th century German Protestant philosophy such as Nietzscheanism which is highly advanced, articulate and reserved only for university students with a humongous vocabulary. Nietzsche stated that it might still be possible for the Germans to become the first non-Christian nation of Europe, thus consummating the work of Luther, – he who taught them to be anti-Roman, and to say: “Here I stand! I cannot do otherwise!” Unlike the naval countries, England, France, Spain, Western and Southern Europe etc, Central and Eastern European countries, which were not as romanised as the aforementioned countries, still have a natural barbarian tendency to be purely European and pagan etc, as demonstrated by Nietzsche’s anti-Judeo-Christian philosophy and by how the heathen Germans tried to uproot the Judeo-Christian religion from Europe during the Holocaust etc. Christian names such Peter, Paul, David, James, Mark, Matthew, Luke, John, Abraham and Isaac etc are of a more or less non-European origin, however because the Judeo-Christian religion is so good and so powerful through Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, we never name our children such like Socrates, Achilles, Tiberius, Octavian, Julius or Athelstan etc. However, if Christian names were ever removed, extirpated, questioned or tampered with it would only lead to disaster. To do so would be complete sacrilege. There’s a natural order to history and religion, and Israel or the Israelites were first, then Greece, Rome and then the Western European naval powers etc. If Nietzsche had tried to write about anti-Judeo-Christian philosophy in the medieval period he would have been burned at the stake and disemboweled as a heretic, and judging from the disaster of the Holocaust, probably for good reasons. Anyway, all this proves that Catholicism is the one and only true western Christian religion and that pagan-German invented Protestantism is completely wrong and totally heinous. Protestantism is heresy. This is because Catholicism and Christianity sticks permanently to Rome and the Romans would never attempt to extirpate or undo the Judeo-Christian religion from Europe as easily as Protestantism or heathen and pagan Germany, Central and Eastern Europe etc. Therefore, through Martin Luther and his 95 theses, Germany even bestowed Protestantism on us Western and Northern Europeans. England, do not copy the Germans! They don’t know what they are doing! Therefore, one way that we Northern Europeans could become good hearted again and quickly is by nationally converting back to Roman Catholicism at the very top-level of state, government and high society etc. I mean the Ismless + ism may hit two birds with one stone, because it may reverse the Reformation and fix the Holocaust at the same time? And remember Martin Luther was also a virulent anti-Semite.

“We got stars directing our faith?”

I went clubbing in the UK and Ibiza in 1999 and it’s almost like clubbing is a religion and Ibiza is a Mecca for young Europeans today, however, clubbing is not a religious ism because it is not universal and it cannot be taught to infants and children as it is a seedy, adult world of drugs, bouncers, club owners and gangsters etc. In fact, clubbing is underground and is pretty much as far away as can be from a benign and sober religion or religious ism which is 100% universal and totally above ground. I don’t think there is any way to overcome the fact that clubbing is about drugs and therefore is adult and therefore cannot be taught to children and therefore cannot be a religion or religious ism. With clubbing it’s as if adults have a secret from infants in that at about 18 years of age we take MDMA or ecstasy, whereas with religious isms such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and the Ismlessism, we have absolutely are no secrets from infants whatsoever. Religious isms are universal, like the nativity they are relevant to any age group. As you know I was brought up in a ‘normal’ Protestant family in the 1980s and 1990s on nothing more than pop culture, I was very ‘pop cultured’. I was a fan of rave, trance music, Jimmy Hendrix, Bob Marley and the Beatles etc, and I truly believed in such superstars like they were gods. I was never indoctrinated in the New Testament with important morals such as Matthew 23:12: For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted. So obviously I turned out to be a vain show-off and drug using teenager. For young Europeans coming of age it’s as if we all know that the Beatles took drugs and expanded their minds and that it is basically kind of a western tradition for us to do the same and carry on the tradition. Also, concerning religions, religious leaders such as Gautama Buddha, Jesus Christ and Saints such as Francis of Assisi etc all lived by example of deliberate poverty, moderation and restraint which makes them infinitely better examples for us and our children that vain, show off, drug using and multi-millionaire superstars, who do not live by example at all. I believe musicians and superstars basically have got the wrong idea. I believe superstars have got it the wrong way round. Religious isms such as the Ismlessism are much better for you.

The cause of something to celebrate.

The Ismless + ism got me thinking that it honestly changes your desires, for example, as you may know I DJ online as well, and up until the 12th April 2021 (when discovered the Ismless + ism), in a perfect universe, all that I wanted to be was a superstar DJ and trance artist. However, it has dawned on me that despite all of these silly desires, if I was just a DJ or a trance artist today I would be unhappy. Because of the Ismless + ism I have no desire to be a DJ or a trance artist anymore, this is because for example, making a trance track, even if it’s a hit doesn’t help save your own people, in fact a hit trance song doesn’t do anything at all apart from give some people on drugs a good time and nostalgia. Think about a trance artist who is making a hit trance track, think of the thoughts and feelings going through his or her head? It’s basically dreams of nothing more than vanity and stardom etc. They don’t want to help save their own people. I just don’t want to be that anymore and this is because the Ismless + ism is real, it does actually help save white people and it is therefore, unbelievably modest, altruistic and noble etc. Now I just dream of being someone like Karl Marx or Plato etc. Although Paul Oakenfold and Danny Rampling changed the world with Acid House during the second summer of love back in 1988 with clubs such as Spectrum and Shoom in London, you cannot say specifically everything that you want to say with music or a trance track, as all your lyrics have to rhyme etc. Music does not really save anything it just inspires. Therefore, I would be unhappy if I was trapped as just a DJ or trance artist, not being able to really help save white people and say what I need to say about the Ismless + ism. Don’t get me wrong I love DJing, however, I would never be just a DJ. Certainly not a young, inexperienced, desperately-aspiring superstar DJ who doesn’t want to be anything else. I would first of all have a main day job such as a writer/philosopher who preaches the Ismless + ism, (which does actually help save white people), and then just DJ, enjoy myself and let my hair down at night or on weekends as well. The Ismless + ism changes your desires. I mean as mentioned I went clubbing in 1999, places like Gatecrasher in Sheffield and I had a whale of a time, however, I just couldn’t do that anymore or not in the same way. In the 1990s it was all new, novel and for the first time and that combined with the millennium made the 1990s something to celebrate. However, I just couldn’t do that anymore. In the 1990s we were young and inexperienced and now in the 2020s we are much more mature and experienced. Because of the novelties and millennium etc the 1990s truly had something to celebrate, however, in the 2020s I just can’t see anything to celebrate, especially for white people. And that’s why I am no longer (or temporarily (for the foreseeable future)) no longer interested in DJing and clubbing etc. Today, being in my 40s I am wiser and more mature and I am more interested in giving us a cause of something to celebrate. And this is what our politicians should do, that is, they should give their own people a cause of something to celebrate. However, since the Holocaust our politicians have given us no cause of something to celebrate. In fact, they seem to be only giving non-white people a cause for celebration at our white people’s expense. I used to think that being a superstar DJ was the best job in the world, but today I don’t really how that’s possible? DJs spin records and mix a small group of people at a party, whereas politicians mix the whole world. Not that I want to be one, politicians do something much bigger than DJing. They determine the party. And they should give us a cause of something to celebrate. Imagine what clubbing in the U.K. and Europe would be like today if there had been no world wars and a Holocaust? Sounds like a cause of something to celebrate to me? Therefore, I am no longer interested in DJing, spinning records or making trance tracks today. If I was to go clubbing ever again, whether in this life or the next I would want something bigger, something more real and a cause of something to truly celebrate etc. I mean trance artists make music which influences clubbers, but what or who influences the mind, thoughts, beliefs and convictions of a trance artist? It is probably politicians who influence all of our brains? Like conductors (or DJs) do politicians make a kind of political symphony that determines the real music that is produced by such as trance artists? Do you see what I mean? There’s kind of a hierarchical order of power, importance and influence and DJs and trance artists are actually not the top of the pecking order, and therefore, influence, control or determine very little indeed. However, who influences the mind, thoughts, beliefs and convictions of politicians? It is probably philosophers such as Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche, John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant etc. Philosophy gets a hard time, particularly from the scientific community. It’s as if when we say that something is philosophical that it means that something is not exactly real? However, as demonstrated by such as Karl Marx, the right kind of philosophy can influence those who influence and therefore, can change the world.

The Power Of The Bible.

“From the 1st or 2nd of August 2016 to the 12th of April 2021 at 21:52:51 (UTC), I read 132 books, 151 books in my entire life. I know one of the first dates is right because I bought my first (serious) book on Amazon on 31st July 2016, and the second date and time is right because that is the precise moment in time that I purchased the domain https://ismlessism.com, which I did instantly after I had the epiphany of the Ismless + ism, (not the adjective ismless, which I got weeks before). Therefore, if you want to change the world, found an ism or start a hypothetical new religion then you have to read. Reading is how I removed the racial hatred and anger from the world and founded the hypothetical new religion of the Ismlessism. Therefore, the more human beings on planet Earth who take up unofficial, serious, general, academic, historical, religious, philosophical and political reading, on the outside of formal or orthodox institutions such as universities, the greater good we will all do for humankind.”

Graham Cammock

Since August 2016 I have taken on a quest to help white people and to fix the ism, namely racism. My journey has taken me to every continent on Earth and through time and space via 150+ books, from the discovery of Africa to the discovery of the New World, from Plato to Socrates, Homer and Aristotle, from Islam to Buddhism, Judaism and Christianity, from prehistory to ancient, medieval and modern times, it’s been quite a thrill. Covering many topics and genres, I read almost every day, mostly history but also quite a lot of religion and philosophy. I have an interest in history, prehistory, religion, government and philosophy etc. The type of books I read are all educational. Although I have read a few scientific books and I do touch on science now and again, my reading is basically non-scientific, but rather historical, educational or academic. Although I have read four Shakespeare plays, which I loved, I don’t really have time to read novels and fiction etc. Again just to warn you about advanced science and professional academia etc, it’s almost as if laypeople should read nothing except novels? Do not read novels! Read educational or academic books etc. Also, although the main or overall purpose of my extensive reading is the Ismless + ism, that is, to overcome racism, however, I believe that I am also trying to attain a kind of general and deep understanding of world history and religion etc. I have read the Bible three times, starting with the Tanakh, then the NRSV and then the NIV version. It definitely won’t be the last time either. In my third reading of the Bible, I really understood the prophecy of the Old Testament, of the coming of the Messiah or ‘the root of Jesse’ etc and how Jesus Christ is the fulfilment of that prophecy. The prophecy of the Old Testament and its fulfilment in the New Testament is the greatest achievement of mankind. The Israelites accomplished the biggest, greatest and most amazing feat in history and for all time. However, my next point is very important, in that I truly believe, in fact I know that the only reason or way that I discovered the Ismless + ism and forgave Adolf Hitler is because I read the Bible three times. Therefore, please do underestimate the power of the Bible. As mentioned I have read over 150 books in my life, mostly history but also philosophy, science and religion etc, however I am coming to the conclusion that everything is auxiliary to the Bible.

See all the books I have read organised into 7 genres and 50 subjects with personal notes on each book here: https://cloud.collectorz.com/cammock/books 

Visit my Goodreads profile here: https://goodreads.com/ismlessism

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Miocene Adolf Hitler, chimpanzee.

Just leave the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler to the Father and the afterlife?

The Ismless + ism got me thinking that man has always had a tendency to leave things which he cannot or does not want to deal with, such as serious sins like genocide, murder and statutory rape for the Father, heaven and the afterlife to somehow miraculously fix and sort out. It’s like an instinctive human reflex that we unconsciously project onto the afterlife all of our fears and the things that we cannot deal with down here on Earth, such as death and the correction of genocide, murder and statutory rape etc. We stuff sinners in prison and say to the Father (and the afterlife):

‘Would you mind please sorting out the forgiveness and the absolution of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc?’

What I am saying is that we Ismlessists have sorted out the forgiveness and absolution of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc ourselves and now, down here on Earth or in life. We Ismlessists do not wait for the afterlife for the solution of difficult moral and ethical problems. Perhaps that is why God and the afterlife exist? I mean because humans automatically project all of their fears and difficulties onto God and the afterlife. Evidently humans cannot survive without God? However, this leaving things for the afterlife and higher powers to deal with may be childish? What if Jesus Christ decided to pick up or taken on all our difficult human fears and our desperate projections onto heaven, God and the afterlife regarding sin and what if this is the reason why He attained all three? Anyway, the Ismless + ism makes us genuinely forgive Adolf Hitler down here in life or on Earth without having to wait for the afterlife. With the Ismless + ism we can be real men and we can deal with all those things that we cannot handle and fear down here on Earth and that which we usually give up to the afterlife to fix, here and now, and down here on Earth. The less things we give up and leave for the afterlife to fix the better.

How to do it.

I mean for example, the thing about the Ismless + ism is that you could be a spiritual or religious leader such as His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, the founder of The International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), known colloquially as the Hare Krishna, however, you will ultimately never in eternity go anywhere near extreme forgiveness or the forgiveness of such as Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile. I mean you can meditate or be so vegetarian that you even stay away from root vegetables for fear of killing the whole plant but you will always and ultimately never forgive such as Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile. This is the error that all loving-kindness preaching and practicing spiritualists and religious leaders make. There is far too much disparity in the world between lovingly-kind spiritual leaders such as His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada who won’t even eat root vegetables and serious sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer. I mean some people get up to the amazingly giddy heights of DJing in wonderland in front of thousands of wonderful people while others of the same generation languish in prison. Please spare a thought for those who languish in prison. I mean this respectfully and as advice because I believe spiritual leaders such as the above, vicars, priests and even the Pope will (unlike Jesus Christ) be caught out or caught with their pants down either in this life or the next regarding extreme forgiveness, in that they will not know what to do and will have no answers regarding the extreme forgiveness of such as Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc. And for spiritual leaders to have no answers is not good. Therefore, although Jainist (non-root vegetable eating) vegetarianism is unbelievably physically hard, extreme forgiveness is emotionally harder. You have got to be brave enough to stand up for Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile. It’s forgiveness and no one on Earth or in history has ever sought (because of Adolf Hitler) absolute and universal forgiveness. It’s hard. This is no offence to religious or spiritual leaders such as His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, because extreme forgiveness or the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler requires a fool to attain it. My advice to such religious leaders regarding extreme forgiveness is to cut the head off the snake. That’s how to do it. And what cuts the head off the snake is the Ismless + ism because it removes the racism from Adolf Hitler. I believe because of the Holocaust, that all answers for the world peace are in the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, that is exactly what my 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler tried to attain, which was ultimately successful with the discovery of the Ismless + ism, which (as it removes the racial hatred from Adolf Hitler), is the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, and therefore, the Ismless + ism is the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, as well as the forgiveness of such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile and all of us minor sinners too. If I had never gone there and asked the question or wrote the thesis I would never have discovered the Ismless + ism, (which is Adolf Hitler’s genuine forgiveness). Therefore, if Adolf Hitler is forgiven why wouldn’t Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile be forgiven also? Therefore, don’t be afraid to forgive. Don’t be afraid of absolute and universal forgiveness.

MISCELLANEOUS.

I take no prisoners!

I mean we have to remember all those people languishing in prison for all kinds of degrees of various sins. I mean if we are being religious about prisoners don’t call it crime, call it sin. There must be millions of people all over the world languishing in prison for various sins, that we all deliberately forget and ignore and this in itself is a sin. We deliberately forget and ignore prisoners and this is totally selfish. When we are getting all hateful and venomous about the absolution of Adolf Hitler please remember all the prisoners around the globe who also need forgiveness. I mean every single person in prison has sinned and they are probably all laughing about the Ismless + ism and the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, because cutting the head of the snake automatically absolves or ameliorates all of their lesser sins by default. You have got to forgive prisoners eventually. Please try not to selfishly and deliberately ignore and forget the millions of prisoners around the world. What did the convict crab say to the free lobster? You shellfish bastard!

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Miocene Adolf Hitler, Charles Darwin.

The Difference. 

The difference between the Ismless + ism and anti-racism is that the Ismless + ism removes racism totally, peacefully, amicably and positively, while anti-racism just attacks and scorns racism maliciously and negatively without removing it from the universe. This means that all white people are being attacked. The Ismless + ism forgives Adolf Hitler for the Holocaust while anti-racism does not even think about how to forgive Adolf Hitler. Anti-racism is not a solution to racism. Although it wins, anti-racism just perpetuates racial hatred and anger in the world. And it gets white people’s backs up. Anti-racism is code for anti-white, while although the Ismless + ism peacefully removes racism, it is also positively white. The perfect and peaceful solution to racism requires a lot more thought than simply just the opposite, the solution to racism is the Ismless + ism.

Confucius.

I have read two books on Taoism (or Daoism as it’s pronounced) and I have also read Confucius: And The World He Created, by Michael Schuman, and I have never been so gripped by a book, in all the books I have read to date, I have never read such an interesting book as this one about Confucius. Confucius is truly huge, and this got me thinking again. China has the world’s best food, a huge united country, a huge population, several religious isms, an up and coming superpower, its own civilisation and great men such as Confucius. What more is there to desire? Europe on the other hand has Adolf Hitler. Europe has Socrates with Adolf Hitler, Plato with Adolf Hitler, Aristotle with Adolf Hitler, Da Vinci with Adolf Hitler, the renaissance with Adolf Hitler and Jesus Christ with Adolf Hitler. Everything we Europeans have done and achieved throughout our recorded history has been tainted by Adolf Hitler. Plus we are a fading superpower and our countries are tiny and disunited. We are miserable. Therefore, we Europeans need to remove, ameliorate or neutralise Adolf Hitler, religiously, philosophically or spiritually from the atmosphere, air, aether or space time continuum. That is exactly why I am doing what I do, that is exactly why I am researching, writing, publishing or promulgating the Ismless + ism. I am using the Ismless + ism to philosophically cleave or remove the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. Cleaving the racism from Adolf Hitler (i.e.: cutting the head off the snake) is not just his absolution, it is also not just the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their countless acts of evil during World War Two, it is morally good for Europe. We Europeans can be great again. We can be Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Jesus Christ again without Adolf Hitler. That is why I am pissing into the wind with the absolution of Adolf Hitler. No body listens to me. People are like why on Earth do you want to forgive Adolf Hitler? To me it’s a silly question, because it is so obvious that there are huge benefits for Europeans with his genuine absolution or forgiveness. You will never cut the head off the snake or remove or cleave the racism from Adolf Hitler with anti-racism, it just pisses him (and me) off. The only way to do that is with the Ismless + ism and then we might get Socrates, and then we might get Plato, and then we might get Aristotle, and then we might get Jesus Christ.

Economic philosophy?

Here is a no brainier that even anti-racists may be able to understand? Why is it that since World War Two, Europe has fallen behind the United States and East Asia at an increasingly rapid rate economically and technologically? Dur! It is because Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust have ruined Europe and made Europeans so damn unpopular globally. Non-white people do not like Europeans on a global and fundamental level and nobody wants us to succeed and make technology etc. Even if you did want to compete with America and Japan technologically, non-white people don’t want to buy our stuff and would probably boycott European technology anyway. It’s hopeless. To rebuild its industries and wealth, post–World War II Japan pursued a goal for fast economic development. The astonishing economic success of post–World War II Japan took the world by surprise. The post–World War II Japanese economy reached growth rates that seemed improbable, achieving over 10 percent a year during the 1960s. By the late 1960s, Japan became the world’s second-largest economy behind America. Japanese businesses were devouring the market share around the globe and seriously competing with the West for the first time in hundreds of years. By the late 1970s it looked like Japan would overtake America as the world’s No. 1 economy. However, Japan was not the only East Asian country in this miraculous economic rise. Many other East Asian economies were also getting rich, for example, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore, known as the Four Little Dragons, achieved growth rates similar to Japan’s. The Four Little Dragons economically kicked the rest of the developing world (such as Africa and Latin America) into touch, with the World Bank declaring the East Asian economic rise a miracle. So what did all these East Asian miraculous economies have in common? Confucianism. Confucianism was the difference between East Asia and Africa/Latin America etc. These East Asian countries came to known as post-Confucian. Confucianism some observers say shaped the behaviours and attitudes of East Asian people which laid the foundation for their own economic success. So again why has Europe fallen behind East Asia economically and technologically? It’s probably because we are ismless? I believe that Europe cannot succeed without an ism of its own in one form or another? Before the Holocaust Europeans probably used racism to build their economies and to innovate technologically? Therefore, because racism is irretrievably broken, perhaps the Ismless + ism, by cutting the head off the snake, removing the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world, would help Europe economically? Genuine popularity with non-white people might mean better economies and technology for Europe? Having an ism of our own which removes racism and forgives Adolf Hitler might kick start our economies and our technological innovation?

Confucius: And the World He Created, by Michael Schuman. Location 3885 – 3921.

Nothing left to fear? When you think about it.

I mean concerning our fears, taboos, political correctness, dark spots and no-go areas, with the Ismless + ism, what else is there left in the universe, existence or reality to fear? We Ismlessists have overcome the fear of racism and talking about it. We Ismlessists have overcome the fear of Adolf Hitler and talking about his absolution. We Ismlessists have overcome the fear of genocide and talking about its absolution. We Ismlessists have overcome the fear of murder and talking about its absolution. We Ismlessists have overcome the fear of statutory rape and talking about its absolution. There is absolutely nothing left to fear imaginable in the universe, aether, atmosphere or anywhere in the space time continuum. There should be no fears anywhere in reality or existence. Think about it, what more can you imagine to be afraid of? There is nothing else to be afraid of and you cannot imagine anything else in the universe left to fear. Therefore, the Ismless + ism just needed doing once and for all to remove all of our fears, taboos, dark spots and no-go areas. The Ismless + ism just needed doing once and for all to help save us all?

The Desire.

You may say that I am trying to be like Jesus Christ by trying to really, genuinely and actually help save white people in reality? No, I am not trying to save mankind like Jesus Christ, that’s just pretending. I am just trying to really, genuinely and actually help save white people in reality, like any other normal caring white person. Well I am an ex-mild-racist now as a result of the discovery of the Ismless + ism, I am an Ismlessist which is the methadone of racism. However, for the best part of 5 years of intensive reading and writing I was a mild racist, and it was entirely mild racism that discovered the Ismless + ism. You may say I am being vain and pretending (or wanting) to be like Jesus Christ by trying to really, genuinely and actually help save white people in reality? No I am not. I am telling you that I have zero desire to be Jesus Christ, I just deeply and devoutly care about my own people. What really annoys about our politicians is that it is plain to see that for example, Africans care more about their own people than they care about Europeans, and Indians care more about their own people than they care about Europeans, however, the current consensus in Europe today (as a result of the Holocaust) is for everyone to care more about other people than their own people. It’s ridiculous. And this is what I am hoping the Ismless + ism reverses. I am hoping that by my own example, that the Ismless + ism will get white people to care more about their own people before other people (for God’s sake). Therefore, I am telling you that devoutly caring about white people is unbelievably altruistic and modest. Look at this website, its art and my two theses, I have done all of this 5 years of intensive reading and writing all for white people. Ismlessists don’t give a damn about nirvana, they just want to really, genuinely and actually help save white people in reality. We do not pretend. Anyway, now I have to be all politically correct and say that rest assured the Ismless + ism has changed my beliefs, in that I now believe that the way to help save white people is to go with the flow (like a dead fish) and try to make non-white people admire or even love white people. By cutting the head off the snake and removing the racism from Adolf Hitler etc, we white people might at least save face? But we must remove racism as well. Just being anti-racist makes non-white people hate us just as much as being racist. All that you taken for granted anti-racists want is to be Buddha or Jesus Christ, which is egoistic. Anyway, non-white people aren’t in trouble. I don’t want to be Jesus Christ, wanting to really, genuinely and actually help save white people in reality is an unbelievably modest desire. If I was born in the 1920s I would have done the same thing, that is I would have tried as hard as I could to save empire, as white people didn’t exactly need saving then. If I was born in the 19th century I wouldn’t have even bothered trying to save anything, as white people definitely didn’t need saving back then, I just would have been a soldier and fought in a war or something to protect, expand and defend empire. So that’s me in a nutshell. I do anything white or for white people. Check the books I have read, all 150 and more of them. I wouldn’t read a single letter if it wasn’t for white people. To me the problem is that white people lost empire in the 1950s and 1960s, and they did not complain. Then we get to 2021 and white people are in trouble and still most white people won’t even admit that they even have a problem, are in trouble or need help. You don’t want to be saved, we all should help save ourselves. I think what the Ismless + ism should do is that although anti-racists don’t have to fundamentally change their position or opinions, however, it should stop or prevent anti-racists, such as Antifascists being over the top, vindictive, malicious, vengeful and nasty towards white people in general. I think most white people are blissfully (or willingly) ignorant of how much flack white people are getting these days? They’re like ostriches with their heads in the ground. Today, with such as Antifascists, white people are being bullied and picked on, it’s revenge and reprisals for empire, colonialism, two (stupid) world wars and the Holocaust etc. Therefore, that’s what the Ismless + ism should do, that is, it should simultaneously remove the racism from Adolf Hitler and remove the desire of non-white Ismlessists to want to destroy or conquer Europe as a reprisal for the Holocaust. It should therefore also reduce over the top, vengeful, vindictive and malicious anti-racism by such as Antifa. In theory there should be a peaceful, non-vindictive, amicable and nonviolent anti-racism. I believe that the Ismless + ism is the answer.

Miocene (Australopithecus afarensis) Adolf Hitler, threatening with rock. Caveman, prehistoric man, subhuman, monkey, ape, primate, animal.
Miocene (Australopithecus afarensis) Adolf Hitler, threatening with rock.

The desire of a white Ismlessist.

I have been on this quest to solve the ism, namely racism since the 1st of August 2016, I know this because I bought my first serious book on Amazon on the 31st July 2016. Anyway, one thing that I have definitely learned and understood on my quest is that having the singular desire to help save white people, with absolutely no desire to attain nirvana, is actually a very modest, humble and altruistic goal or exercise. The Ismless + ism is a hypothetical, anti-racist, syncretic, fundamental and ‘non-nirvana’ (that is, non-Buddha/Christ seeking) religion, like Confucianism, Taoism, Jainism, Zoroastrianism or Hinduism etc, that is, we do not give a damn about personally attaining nirvana for absolutely no good reason or to simply just sit there yogis-style and be it. We just want to help save white people, which is an unbelievably modest desire. It’s about doing not being. Therefore, the only desire of a white Ismlessist is to help save all white people through non-discriminatory and non-racist ways (and absolutely nothing else). To me that’s Ismlessists in a nutshell, that is, they should be unbelievably altruistic.

To reiterate the desire of a white Ismlessist is:

  1. To fix and remove the ism, namely the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world.
  2. To absolve or forgive Adolf Hitler.
  3. To remove the racial hatred and anger from the world.
  4. To fix the Holocaust.
  5. To admire, like and love non-white Ismlessists.
  6. To help save white people.
  7. To have absolutely zero desire to attain nirvana.
  8. To have absolutely no desire to help save white people through discriminatory or racist methods.
  9. To have no desire to be able to tell the difference between non-white Ismlessists and white Ismlessists. We cannot tell the difference.

The second last point is important because both white and non-white Ismlessists believe that the universe works, and that the universe always has an answer or solution to any issue for those who sincerely and humbly ask. Therefore, there will be no need to discriminate against non-white Ismlessists in order to help save white people.

The desire of a non-white Ismlessist.

The desire of a non-white Ismlessist is even more important than a white Ismlessist. The deal is that the Ismlessism is a 100% universal and anti-racist religion or religious ism, however, the stipulation should be that a non-white Ismlessist who wishes to follow the Ismlessism should:

  1. Truly and genuinely want us Europeans to fix and remove the ism, namely racism, before anything else at all.
  2. Have absolutely no schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust and downfall.
  3. Genuinely admire, like and love white Ismlessists.
  4. Most importantly have absolutely no desire at all to destroy, conquer or master Europe or other white countries.

This last point is essential, in that it should be a non-white Ismlessist’s internal conviction, faith or belief to have absolutely zero desire to destroy, conquer or master Europe or Europeans. We white Ismlessists will be able to know and tell if you hide any such desire. As you can see our desires as Ismlessists are connected to the simultaneity of the Ismless + ism, in that the Ismless + ism simultaneously removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and removes the desire of non-white Ismlessists to want to destroy or conquer Europe.

Why? Schadenfreude.

Schadenfreude is a bad thing, especially having schadenfreude about Europe’s unspeakable Holocaust. It is wrong to have schadenfreude about Europe’s demise due to its terrible Holocaust. Who does have schadenfreude about the Holocaust? I know that Asians do not have any schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust, probably because Asians and Europeans are both out of Africa, 100% equal and because Asians have many religious isms of their own. However, does America have schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust and unfortunate demise? Does Africa have schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust and downfall? Please try not to have any schadenfreude about Europe’s Holocaust. Let all people on planet Earth work together to fix the Holocaust, Europe and remove racism peacefully. One reason why I made the Ismlessism a hypothetical, universal and anti-racist religion is because I know and can definitely tell that Asians like it, probably because they know it is a good hearted religious ism because it solves the ism, namely racism. However, I think the main reason why I like or love Asians and the reason why I made the Ismlessism a universal and anti-racist religion is because I know that the Asians do not in any way have any schadenfreude regarding the Holocaust, in that Asians are not happy at all that Europeans are in trouble and that Asians truly and genuinely want us Europeans to fix the ism, namely racism. That is why the Ismlessism is a universal and anti-racist religion or religious ism.

Chivalry.

I will put it to you now, that the prime desire of my endeavours since 2007, and definitely since the 1st of August 2016 (when I started reading), was the defence and protection of our European white women. I did not in any way want to share our beautiful European white women with anyone else in the world. However, the Ismless + ism has changed all that, in that I now believe wholeheartedly that if as European men you want to keep your beautiful white European women, that you have to win, earn and impress them, that is, you have to make European men generally and genuinely attractive, likeable, amiable, respected, loveable and impressive to European white women. Because of two (stupid) World Wars and the Holocaust, our European women are probably less loyal toward us European men? I mean if we are not a hero and a winner and they don’t like us, European white women will probably leave us? To reiterate, we Europeans have to impress our own women like we used to before the Holocaust. Women should never need to have zealous loyalty like men. We European men have got to make our European women genuinely love us, and the only way to do that is to be as good and virtuous as Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Therefore, that is what the Ismless + ism hopes to achieve, in that it should genuinely make our European white women like us European men again like they used to before the Holocaust. Despite what the Nazis did, today, European men have to compete with Asian and African men to win their own European white women both individually and across the board. I believe that we have got to be virtuous and impressive across the board to be attractive, likeable, adorable and loveable to our European women?

Eastern peace and Western violence.

It’s strange however, the Ismlessism really changes you. I used to be a little bit of a fascist, I used to believe that there absolutely had to be minimal impoliteness somewhere at some point in time towards non-white people, in order to save our race, secure our borders and protect our women etc. Believe me, the racist mentality is basically a bit like a warrior, like Achilles, even if you just mean a little impoliteness or a little aggression etc. It’s like ridiculous to racists, they don’t see anything wrong with a little rudeness, racists are like ‘Come on!? You can’t even be impolite!?’ I think this is the point that racists and fascists are missing, in that Europeans have been far too violent and aggressive throughout history, particularly in the 20th century. Therefore, the point that the far-right are missing is that Europeans cannot use any aggression, hate or violence in any way at all, that is, in writing, thoughts or speech etc. Racists don’t see anything wrong with what they are doing, they see themselves as virtuous, brave and glorious etc, by protecting our women, country and race etc. Racists think in terms of philosophical or political isms such as Nazism, Communism and fascism etc. It’s heinous and totally wrong. The Ismlessism has had me thinking recently that unlike India who worshipped and adored the Buddha from day one and allowed Him to live a long, healthy and peaceful life, that we violent westerners quickly committed deicide by nailing our God to the Cross! What would the world have been like if there had been no crucifixion? What would the world have been like if we westerners had allowed Jesus Christ to live a long, healthy and peaceful life like the Buddha? Would Europe have been a generally more peaceful continent? Probably. Would the Holocaust had happened? Probably not. Please take a moment to compare how India treated the Buddha and the west treated Jesus Christ? There is quite a contrast isn’t there? India is so much more peaceful than Europe. Save Islam, the west (or Europe) is so much more violent and aggressive than India, China and Asia as a whole, as demonstrated by the crucifixion, two world wars and the Holocaust. This is where is the Ismlessism comes in, because it simultaneously hits at least two birds with one stone. Firstly, the Ismless + ism removes racism from Adolf Hitler and the world, secondly the Ismless + ism removes the desire of non-white Ismlessists to want to destroy or conquer Europe, therefore, the Ismless + ism brings peace and non-violence to the world. The Ismlessism changes right-wing people like me, and turns them away from political or philosophical isms such as Nazism, Communism and fascism etc and makes them unbelievably religious, peaceful, good hearted and non-violent like Mahatma Gandhi. White people don’t need political leaders such as For Britain’s Anne Marie Waters, Britain First’s Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen and the English Defence League’s Tommy Robinson. (In fact, note the last three have all spent time in prison for aggressive behaviour or speech etc). White people are not allowed political leaders! What white people desperately need is lower class, peaceful, nonviolent, good hearted religious or spiritual leaders like Mahatma Gandhi. No one listens to the Archbishop of Canterbury, because he is Protestant, what we need is poor, grassroots and lower class, nonviolent and peaceful religious leaders that live by example and come out of nowhere. Trust me, excepting violent Antifa, all those peaceful, nonviolent and anti-racist politicians, liberals and PC brigade (that you racists hate) are 99% right, they are just not removing the ism, namely racism from the world, plus they are not an official or formal religious ism.

The fool who discovered how to forgive Adolf Hitler.

So you know that Adolf Hitler is the Ismlessist and that by making him the Ismlessist is how to remove the racism from him and therefore, that is his absolution. You also know that I Graham Cammock am the fool who wrote the 87,000 word anti-racist joke about how to forgive Adolf Hitler and that as a result of that thesis I discovered the Ismless + ism, which is the true absolution of Adolf Hitler. Obviously, I would like to go down or be known as the discoverer or father of the Ismless + ism and the absolution of Adolf Hitler, however, the Ismless + ism probably will not stop there? For example, Sir Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin, however, it took many other very intelligent unsung heroes to concentrate penicillin enough for it to be effective and to manufacture it on an industrial scale. However, penicillin is important enough that it doesn’t matter who gets the fame or credit, it just needs doing very quickly for the benefit of humankind. I believe that the Ismless + ism is potentially as important to white people as penicillin is to the whole world. Also, although Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto and discovered or invented Communism, it took Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin to turn it into a worldwide revolution. Like Marxism, do Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin also get ‘isms’ suffixed to the end their surnames? Yes. Budush! Therefore, although I am the discoverer or father of the Ismless + ism and extreme forgiveness, it doesn’t matter as we will need heroic figures such as Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin down the line somewhere to turn the Ismless + ism into a revolution and a reality. And like penicillin it is so important that it just needs doing. Therefore, I just wanted to make sure you know what I believe I have achieved. I believe that I have enabled or made it possible for everyone on Earth to be able to easily forgive Adolf Hitler. I believe I have cut the head off the snake, removed the racism from Adolf Hitler which is therefore, his absolution, which leads to the absolution of all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, as well as the relative forgiveness of all of our minor or petty sins by default. In theory there should be no problems or obstacles too high in the universe. Therefore, in theory I have enabled you and everyone to forgive such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile as well. So I have enabled, like a new plane I have normalised the absolution of Adolf Hitler and made it infinitely easier for everyone and anyone to forgive him and the other sinners of the world too.

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Pliocene (Australopithecus afarensis) Adolf Hitler, bipedal first step on the road to advancement.

What the Ismless + ism does as opposed to what the it is. Is it invisible?

Initially I changed the symbol for the Ismless + ism quite frequently, and not being entirely happy with the symbol for the Ismless + ism, I tried many things which worked in different ways, for example the Yin-Yang symbol which worked in that it artistically looks like an Asian ism, however, the Yin-Yang symbol actually means something quite deep and complex and obviously other than the ‘religious ism’, aesthetic, artistic or creative qualities it has no actual bearing or relation to the Ismless + ism whatsoever. Adolf Hitler borrowed the swastika from Jainism and what did that mean? I suppose that I thought along similar lines only in a completely opposite, peaceful and nonviolent sense. Asia has all the religious isms while Europe has none. I have also tried a general prohibition sign over the word ‘isms’ which worked but is a little non-religious and political or philosophical and not that attractive? Therefore, I have really racked my brains about what the Ismless + ism is and how to fundamentally visualise or represent it? I have come to the conclusion that the Ismless + ism is basically formless, unrepresentable and unvisualisable? It’s invisible. However, I came up with a symbol that indirectly represents what the Ismless + ism does as opposed to what it is. The Ismless +ism cuts the head off the snake, which means it removes the racism from Adolf Hitler, which absolves each and every individual (countless) act of evil committed by subordinate Nazis during World War Two. Forgiving Adolf Hitler through the Ismless + ism doesn’t just apply to Nazis, it is in theory absolute and universal forgiveness, in that it applies to all of us. Therefore, we can use the Ismless + ism to forgive all other smaller-scale serious sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer, Jimmy Savile etc. And therefore, we can use the Ismless + ism in order to forgive all of us for all of our relatively minor sins, including our inconsequential acts of theft, our sexual deviances and all other lesser sins throughout all of space and time? Take the opportunity. I mean what do Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile care about our relatively minor sins? Therefore, that is what the Ismless + ism does, it cuts the head off the snake and that is one way to indirectly represent or visualise it, but how to visualise or represent it directly or fundamentally I have no idea. What do you think? Do you have any ideas of how to represent or visualise the Ismless + ism directly or fundamentally?

It symbolises world peace.

Is it a question of what symbolises the Ismless + ism? Or is it a question of what does the Ismless + ism symbolise? I have come to the conclusion that whatever image, object, shape or art represents, visualises or symbolises the Ismless + ism directly or fundamentally, that what is most important is that the Ismless + ism symbolises world peace. Therefore, the symbol of the hypothetical, syncretic, anti-racist and fundamental religion of the Ismless + ism may have to symbolise world peace? Cutting the head off the snake symbolises an action of what the Ismless + ism does as opposed to what it is. However, does cutting the head off the snake symbolise world peace? I am not sure, however, the symbol of the ismless + ism may have to be a peace dove or a peace symbol etc to reflect this aspect?

Nobel peace prize.

I mean if as a convinced Ismlessist you are not happy or comfortable with the answer ‘to help save white people’ when over-zealous and malicious anti-racists pop the ignorant question: ‘Why on Earth do you want to forgive Adolf Hitler?’ that’s fine, because another obvious answer is world peace. Cutting the head off the snake by using the Ismless + ism to remove or cleave the racism from Adolf Hitler is not only his and all subordinate Nazis’ absolution for their individual acts of terror during World War Two, it also symbolises world peace. In fact, world peace is a much better answer to that ignorant anti-racist question than helping to save white people, although that will happen as well.

Mahatma Gandhi.

As you may know I take a lot of inspiration from Mahatma Gandhi, especially regarding nonviolence and I discovered some amazing quotes of Mahatma Gandhi that really fortify me and give me much confidence regarding forgiveness.

For example:

“The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.“

Mahatma Gandhi

“Hate the sin, love the sinner.”

Mahatma Gandhi

I mean if forgiveness is the ‘attribute of the strong’ how strong are we Ismlessists with the true absolution of Adolf Hitler? How strong are we Ismlessists with the forgiveness of Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile? How strong are we Ismlessists with cutting the head off the snake and the ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness of all sins throughout all space and time? And how weak are our politicians who couldn’t forgive Adolf Hitler if their life depended on it? For example don’t listen to people who say things like this:

“Forgiveness has nothing to do with absolving a criminal of his crime. It has everything to do with relieving oneself of the burden of being a victim–letting go of the pain and transforming oneself from victim to survivor.”

C.R. Strahan

C.R. Strahan is weak because he can’t or won’t dare go there and absolve a criminal of his crime. Ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness has everything to do with ‘absolving a criminal of his crime’ because it cuts the head off the snake, therefore, automatically absolving all of our minor or petty sins. When C.R. Strahan says ‘It has everything to do with relieving oneself of the burden of being a victim–letting go of the pain and transforming oneself from victim to survivor’ he is relatively only talking about or dealing with such as a cheating spouse. Although you may feel hurt if your spouse cheats on you and has a baby behind your back, think of the Holocaust victims and survivors. They are the only ‘victims’ and ‘survivors’ that we care about. Although having an affair can be grounds for divorce and does get legal regarding finances, custody and property etc, it is not a crime. Therefore, beyond schadenfreude gossip no one cares about your cheating spouse. Suck it up! People are not interested in your cheating spouse, however, they are interested in the absolution of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile. As of July 2021 I have read over 130 books since August 2016, I have put years into researching how to make it up for the Holocaust to the Jews and how to genuinely forgive (never justify) Adolf Hitler, therefore, believe me when I say I know how to forgive. Contrary to what C.R. Strahan says, it has everything to do with absolving a criminal of his crime, because it cuts the head off the snake, therefore, there is hope for the rest us in the forgiveness of such as Adolf Hitler. Real, true, ultimate and actual forgiveness is the absolution of Adolf Hitler. Forgiving a cheating spouse is not real forgiveness. Don’t think that by practicing petty and everyday forgiveness that you are achieving something. You have to forgive Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc. You have to practice ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness. I mean Mahatma Gandhi said things which were good for Indians, but no European religious or political leader has ever said anything good for Europeans since 1945. You can’t say anything anti-racist and simultaneously say something good for Europeans. And you can’t say anything racist period. So what do we do? Say something about the Ismless + ism! The Ismless + ism is the methadone of racism. Ismlessists are neither racist nor anti-racist, they are in between and they have all the humour. Europeans need many Mahatma Gandhi-style religious or political leaders of their own that actually say something positive and good for Europeans. I will start by saying I am actually going to say something good for Europeans. The Ismless + ism is the 100% absolution of Adolf Hitler because it removes the racism from Adolf Hitler. Therefore, the Ismless + ism is the absolution of all Europeans for the Holocaust. Therefore, the Ismless + ism is good for Europeans.

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Lower Palaeolithic (Homo erectus) Adolf Hitler, gathering with sticks and stones.

With the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler.

I would just like to state that I am not and I am never doing taken for granted anti-racism, that is, anti-racism without a religious ism. All taken for granted anti-racists, including governments, the police, politicians and media etc, (who also protect and harbour violent, left-wing extremist groups such as Antifa), currently and (since World War Two) have preached taken for granted anti-racism. I went straight from a mild racist to an Ismlessist without skipping a beat. I have never been a taken for granted anti-racist. However, I will do 100% confirmed anti-racism with, through or covered by the Ismless + ism. We should never say that we are anti-racists or that we are doing taken for granted anti-racism, but that we are Ismlessists and we profess the Ismless + ism. Mainstream politicians being devout taken for granted anti-racists etc, do not in any way have to change anything they do or anything they believe, only that they should identify as Ismlessists and they should profess the Ismless + ism. The Ismless + ism is everything you taken for granted anti-racists want, only it is much better and a bit more formal to do it with a religious ism. You taken for granted anti-racists are doing the right thing, only you are not helping or caring about white people simultaneously, whereas the Ismless + ism does. The way that you taken for granted anti-racists do anti-racism, without fixing or removing the ism, namely racism, only makes non-white people hate us even more. The Ismless + ism came entirely from mild racism, but it converted me into a convinced, believing and confirmed anti-racist. Therefore, the Ismless + ism came entirely from mild racism and the right, however, if we are going to do anti-racism, you current left-wing and taken for granted anti-racists should have to do the Ismless + ism entirely our way. We will do it with the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. However, ultimately, and after much consideration, I believe that Ismlessists are neither racist nor anti-racist, they are in between and they have all the humour.

Peace.

I believe the reason that British people were terrorised with such as grooming gangs over recent decades by predominantly Asian men is because white people have not fixed the ism, namely racism. The ism, namely racism causes racial hatred and anger in the world, and such as the Asian rape gangs do what they do out anger or hate for white people because white people have a serious problem, in that they have not fixed the ism, namely racism. As demonstrated by such as the September 11th attacks in America in 2001 and the frequency of smaller scale acts of Islamic terror and violence in Europe, anti-racism is clearly not working and is not the solution to racism and world peace. What I would say to racists, is that although the Ismless + ism is not racist, it may at least stop such as Islamic terrorism, grooming gangs and the hatred of Europeans by non-white people. The Ismless + ism is a double ism, it is thee ism, and it cleaves and removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. The Ismlessism is a new hypothetical fundamental religion and if it was promulgated and instituted in Europe it would probably remove the racial hatred and anger in the world and prevent the hatred and anger arising in Asian and African men, thereby preventing things such as terrorism and grooming gangs etc.

It’s white people’s opportunity.

Whether as an anti-racist white person you want to admit it or not, anti-racism and political correctness will not stop until white skin is inferior and being white is considered the lurgy. We must stop or reverse this trend before anti-racism and political correctness get out of hand. Also, I just wanted to point out that other than helping to forgive Adolf Hitler, at this point I don’t absolutely know the benefits in forgiving such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile etc, whereas obviously there is a huge obvious benefit for Europe and white people in the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler. Therefore, the absolution of Adolf Hitler is an opportunity. Adolf Hitler may be a big problem for white people, however, we can turn that problem into an opportunity. It’s an opportunity to reap all of the benefits locked in Adolf Hitler for white people, as if Holocaust never happened. It’s something to do. Helping to save white people is something to do. Removing or cleaving the racism from Adolf Hitler is something only white people can do. It’s white people’s opportunity.

Forgive Adolf Hitler and cut the head off the snake.

Just to expound on a previous line of thought, as I stated ultimate, absolute and universal forgiveness is the absolution of Adolf Hitler, because all other lesser sins are forgiven by default. The idiom ‘to cut the head off the snake’ means to stop a larger problem by aiming at the source – often the leader, or a major culprit. Now usually this is taken in a military context, as in to assassinate Adolf Hitler would cut the head off the snake, causing Nazism to crumble and therefore to win World War Two. However, now that Adolf Hitler is long dead and now that he has left us white people down here with a major racism problem, I mean to cut the head off the snake in a forgiveness or forgiving context, which is even better. To cut the head off the snake means that to forgive Adolf Hitler is universal forgiveness, I mean instead of inefficiently trying to forgive each and every individual (and countless) act of terror committed by subordinate Nazis during World War Two. Forgiving Adolf Hitler through the Ismless + ism doesn’t just apply to Nazis, it is in theory absolute and universal forgiveness, in that it applies to all of us. Therefore, to reiterate, we can use the Ismless + ism to forgive all other smaller-scale serious sinners such as Jeffrey Dahmer, Jimmy Savile etc. And therefore, we can use the Ismless + ism in order to forgive all of us for all of our relatively minor sins, including our inconsequential acts of theft, our sexual deviances and all other lesser sins throughout all of space and time? Take the opportunity. I mean what do Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and Jimmy Savile care about our relatively minor sins? To make Adolf Hitler the Ismlessist and to make sure that he believes in and professes the Ismless + ism is to remove the racism from Adolf Hitler which cuts the head off the snake and forgives all subordinate Nazis for their individual acts of terror during World War Two. The Ismless + ism is the absolution of Adolf Hitler because it removes racism from him and the world. The Ismless + ism is absolute, universal and extreme forgiveness.

Are you an Ismlessist?

As I mentioned at the beginning, people don’t need to go through a ritual or an initiation process to become an anti-racist for example, they simply pick it up. Therefore, to become an Ismlessist, all that you had to do was read this thesis and if by now you are convinced about the rightness and benefits of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler, then you are a convert to the Ismless + ism? Now that you have finished reading this essay, something should have changed inside of your head, and if you are now convinced that you forgive Adolf Hitler, then you are therefore a confirmed Ismlessist?

How do I officially institute, promulgate and implement the Ismless + ism?

It’s easy, as mentioned the Ismless + ism does something, it cuts the head off the snake, similarly you can easily become an Ismlessist by reading this entire thesis and if you subsequently believe in the correctness and benefits of the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler for Europe and white people, then you are therefore, a confirmed Ismlessist. All that you have to do to be an Ismlessist is forgive Adolf Hitler. Becoming an Ismlessist is as easy as becoming anti-racist, it’s simply a thought, an identity and you just pick it up. The only issue is that the adjective Ismlessist is not yet common knowledge. Perhaps if the noun Ismlessism and the adjective Ismlessist were entered into the Oxford English Dictionary, this would help officially implement and promulgate it across the board? Also, the reason that the Ismless + ism is a religious ism as opposed to a political ism like anti-racism or philosophical ism like meta-ethical relativism, is because unlike those technically advanced isms, the Ismless + ism is simple and universal like the Christian nativity, which means it can be taught to infants as well as adults of all ages. I honestly believe that you can teach infants about the genuine forgiveness of Adolf Hitler and all subordinate the Nazis with or through the Ismless + ism. Therefore, the Ismless + ism could be taught in nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools etc. Ironically, that is the beauty, power and strength of religious isms such as the Ismless + ism because they can be taught in nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools etc, as opposed to universities. The earlier you learn something such as the Ismless + ism, the better and more powerful the effect is for the country or continent as a whole. Ironically, advanced philosophical isms such as meta-ethical relativism which can only be taught at universities are therefore actually very weak and powerless. Therefore, that is another way in which the Ismless + ism can be instituted, promulgated and implemented nationally and across the continent, by officially making it a part of the national curriculum and teaching it in nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools etc. I mean children are still indoctrinated in Confucianism in East Asia. Another way is through television and the mainstream media, believe me as a former mild racist I know how powerful the mainstream media is, if they want something to rise or happen, they can make it happen. Again, the Ismless + ism so simple, it is not an advanced technical thing that is hard to articulate or communicate through television etc. It’s easy. So the are many ways that the Ismless + ism can be officially instituted, promulgated and implemented in the U.K. and Europe. The good news is that you can actually help save and protect white people without being a racist. It’s called being an Ismlessist. I mean non-white people would probably say regarding the statement “the Ismless + ism is the methadone of racism”, that “it’s still racist!” Erm. No it’s not! That’s the whole point of the Ismless + ism, it cleaves and removes the racism from the atmosphere.

Anti-racism does not work.

I mean the thing is about the Ismless + ism is that it is a genuine alternative to racism and anti-racism. It is the methadone of racism. Believe me, when I was a mild racist, for 5 years I singularly pursued and honed in on the noun racism like a blood hound. I did this because I knew (or thought) that there was absolutely nothing else that would protect and help save white people. It had to be racism or nothing (or something invisible) that would protect and help save white people. I knew in every atom and fibre of my bones and body that racism is all things to white people. It’s not that mild racists like it, there just is simply no alternative. Racists try wishy washy alternatives like alt-right, nationalism and nativism etc and none of them work, satisfy or hit the nail on the head. However, the Ismless + ism is a real alternative to racism that does satisfy and hit the nail on the head. This is because is defends and protects white people without being racist and once again, to demonstrate if anti-racists say to us when we say that “the Ismless + ism is the methadone of racism”, that “it’s still racist!” We can say Erm. No it’s not! That is the whole point of the Ismless + ism, it cleaves and removes the racism from Adolf Hitler and the world. You may say how is the Imsless + ism an alternative to anti-racism? The general consensus among our European or white political leaders is that because of the Holocaust there is no alternative to anti-racism. However, the thing about anti-racism is that reality checks it and proves it wrong, as demonstrated by such as the frequency of acts of Islamic terror and violence in Europe, such as the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheadings in France etc, anti-racism is clearly not working and is not the solution to racism and world peace etc. The bottom line is that our white politicians have got to accept, as evidenced by such as Islamic terrorism is that ant-racism does not work. As Europeans would have got to be right, and because anti-racism is anti-white, it means that you are not right. Perhaps the Ismless + ism being neither racist nor anti-racist would make Europeans right again? Therefore, the Ismless + ism also a genuine alternative to anti-racism as well.

Warning.

As I have mentioned, as a layperson don’t be afraid to read, write and philosophise independently, I mean don’t let extremely advanced science, expertise, highly advanced philosophy and anal professionalism put you off reading, writing and philosophising independently. However, be warned, going off my experience as a schizophrenic, everyone will think you’re crazy.

Forgive Adolf Hitler
Pliocene (Australopithecus africanus) Adolf Hitler, with animal bones.

Not finished.

I have only just begun this second thesis or essay, I am just basically coagulating this essay from all of my good posts about the Ismless + ism. I’m not sure if I have another 87,000 words in me about the Ismless + ism, but as you know God loves a trier. Therefore, for now, why not listen to some of my trance mixes, peruse my 87,000 word (inaccurate) anti-racist joke regarding the forgiveness of Adolf Hitler or view its over 100 attendant works of comical digital art?